There are about 5205 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Hungary. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Researchers are looking for a better way to treat people who have chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a long-term condition that occurs when the heart is too weak to pump enough blood to the rest of the body. This results in a reduced supply of the oxygen that the body requires to function properly. The common symptoms of HFrEF include breathlessness, weakness, fatigue, and swelling in the ankles and legs. If left untreated, heart failure can lead to other serious health problems, including damage to other organs, which may result in hospital stays or even death. Vericiguat is an approved drug for use in people with chronic HFrEF. It works by activating a protein called soluble guanylate cyclase, which helps dilating the blood vessels and in turn improves heart function. Currently, treatment with vericiguat starts at a daily dose of 2.5 milligrams (mg), which increases to 5 mg after 2 weeks. The dose is then increased to the target dose of 10 mg after another 2 weeks. In this study, researchers are trying to learn how well participants can tolerate and how safe it is to start vericiguat at a dose of 5 mg. Starting directly at the 5 mg dose is expected to help reach the target dose of 10 mg faster. Participants will take vericiguat 5 mg as a tablet by mouth once daily along with their regular heart medications. At the start of the study, study doctors will check participants' medical history and perform full health check-ups to confirm if they can take part in the study. Throughout the study, study doctors will monitor participants' previous and current medications, their heart health, and their overall well-being. This will help researchers assess how safe the study drug is and if they experience adverse events. An adverse event is any medical problem that a participant has during a study. Doctors keep track of all adverse events, irrespective of whether they think they are related to the study treatment. Access to study treatment after the end of this study is not planned. Everyone, including study doctors and participants, will know what drug the participants receive during the study. Participants may be in the study for about 4 weeks. Participants may not benefit from the treatment as the study is designed to assess safety and tolerability: the duration of the study is very short and participants will be taking a low dose of vericiguat without moving to the target dose of 10 mg during the study. However, the findings of this study may enable people with chronic HFrEF to safely skip one initial dosing step and reach the target dose of vericiguat faster. Participants may experience medical problems such as low blood pressure, upset stomach, nausea, dizziness, and headache. Researchers will monitor and manage all these, and other, medical problems participants may have during the study.
The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the learning curve of TVUS (transvaginal ultrasound) for the visualization of sacral nerve roots and sacral plexus on gynecological transvaginal ultrasound. The investigators aim to evaluate to evaluate the number needed to gain competence or to review the level of competence.
The improvement or preservation of quality of life (QoL) is one of the three pillars of the European Union (EU) Mission on Cancer, which underpins the needs of patients from cancer diagnosis throughout treatment, survivorship, and advanced terminal stages. Clinical studies and real-world data show that the use of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for QoL assessment in routine oncology practice has positive effects on patient wellbeing and healthcare resource utilization. However, full implementation of PROMs is not yet part of standard of care and is not adequately considered in cancer policies and programs. A comprehensive tool incorporating the perspective of patients at different stages of the disease trajectory and widely applicable across Europe is still lacking. The European Oncology Quality of Life Toolkit (EUonQoL-Kit) is a unified patient-centred tool for the assessment of QoL, developed from preferences and priorities of people with past or current cancer experience. The EUonQoL-Kit includes three electronic questionnaires, specifically designed for different disease phases (patients in active treatment, survivors, and patients in palliative care), available in both static and dynamic (Computer Adaptive Testing, CAT) versions and in several European languages. This is a multicentre observational study, with the following aims: - The primary aim is to perform the psychometric validation of the EUonQoL-Kit. - Secondary aims are to assess its acceptability, to validate the CAT version, and to provide estimates of QoL across different European countries. The EUonQoL-Kit will be administered to a sample of cancer patients and survivors from 46 European cancer centres. The sample will include patients in active treatment (group A), survivors (group B), and patients in Palliative Care (group C). Each centre will recruit 100 patients (40 from group A, 30 from group B, 30 from group C), for an overall sample size of 4,600 patients (at least 4,000 patients are assumed to be enrolled, due to an expected lower recruitment rate of 10-15%). Three sub-samples of patients (each corresponding to 10% of the total sample for each centre) will fill in an additional questionnaire: - EORTC QLQ-C30, to test concurrent validity. - Live-CAT version, to test the feasibility of such implementation. - EUonQoL-Kit, 2-7 days after the first completion, to assess test-retest reliability.
The goal of this multicentre, prospective, randomized, open, blinded for evaluation of end point (PROBE) controlled parallel-group superiority trial, is to compare the efficacy of antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy and cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) regarding freedom from atrial fibrillation (%) assessed by an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM), ECG tracing or Holter at 12 months in patients with persistent AF. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: - Will first-line cryoballoon ablation for PVI compared to AAD, result in 25 % higher freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias lasting > 6 minutes at 12 months (primary outcome) excluding three months initial blanking period, in patients with symptomatic and recurrent persistent AF? - Will first-line cryoablation for PVI, compared to AAD result in a superior improvement in health related Quality of Life (HRQoL), AF/AT burden, AF/AT progression and reversion, more reverse atrial remodeling, cognitive function, healthcare utilization with associated costs, better safety, at 12-24-36 months as compared with drug use? Participants will be randomized 1:1 to first-line PVI using the cryoballoon or to first-line antiarrhythmic drug therapy and during 3 years follow-up undergo regular; - Continuous ECG monitoring for assessment of first AF recurrence and AF burden using an implantable cardiac monitor, - Regular echocardiographic exams for reverse atrial remodelling assessment, - HRQoL questionnaires - Assessment of cognitive function - Atrial fibrillation evaluation regarding structured characterisation and AF progression/regression - Assessment of Health care use and costs - Safety
The study will aim to find out if the drug andexanet alfa is safe and effective in preventing major bleeding during urgent surgery or invasive procedures. The study will compare the use of andexanet alfa to the usual care given at the study center.
Investigation of the potential prognostic role of non-invasive myocardial work in patients receiving veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy.
This is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study that will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous (IV) ganaxolone versus placebo co-administered with IV antiepileptic drug (AED) according to standard of care for the treatment of RSE. Approximately 70 participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive ganaxolone IV solution or placebo IV solution along with standard of care (SOC) IV AED.
MISTRAL (Microbiome-based stratification of individuals at risk of HIV-1 acquisition, chronic clinical complications, antimicrobial drug resistance, and unresponsiveness to therapeutic HIV-1 vaccination) is a 5-year EU Horizon 2020 project, running from 1/1/2020 - 31/12/2024. The project is led by Fundacio Privada Institut de Recerca de la Sida-Caixa CAIXA in Barcelona and aims to explore the gut microbiota in relation to HIV-1, seeking microbiome biomarkers to support development of interventions that mitigate infection and enhance response to vaccines and therapies. If successful, MISTRAL will benefit millions of human beings living with, or at risk of acquiring HIV-1 infection, and will produce novel concepts and technical innovations applicable to other human diseases. By doing that, MISTRAL will help to unlock the full clinical potential of the human microbiome to stratify patient outcomes and will irreversibly bring microbiome science closer to clinical practice
It is a prospective, cross-sectional, observational, controlled, single centre clinical study. Diabetic patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria and healthy controls will have uroflowmetry examination, cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction tests (heart rate response to deep breathing, to Valsalva maneuver, blood pressure and heart rate response to standing up, and to sustained handgrip), and peripheral nerve conduction test. The primary endpoint is the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values) of the tests. The secondary endpoints are: differences in metabolic status (weight, height, body surface, BMI, laboratory parameters, body composition), fluid turnover, and clinical symptoms of diabetic patients comparing to healthy children.
Observational investigation of participants who are given neoadjuvant treatment for invasive breast cancer. The scope of the study is to collect information on standardized treatment results, to explore the causes of dose modification and its effect on efficacy, to explore potential prognostic factors, and to explore the long-term side effects of different treatment modalities.