There are about 25435 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in United Kingdom. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Male self catherterisng observational study.
A study to examine if the gamification of routine airway clearance can improve the quality of live for young people living with chronic health conditions.
A prospective cohort mixed study using both qualitative and quantitative elements. The quantitative component will involve tracking outcomes at baseline and at twelve weeks, using Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for People with a Learning Disability (for quality of life) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Rating Scale (for anxiety and depression). The qualitative study will involve semi structured interviews with end users to understand usage and acceptability of Brain in Hand app with the added impact of the pandemic.
This study estimates the impact of patient safety events on QoL in elective surgery patients using a secondary data set
In order to address the growing problem of chronic pain management in the UK, a proof of concept/feasibility open label cohort study has been devised to explore the effectiveness of a home-based self-administered non-pharmacological treatment utilising neurofeedback (NFB) training with a headset and tablet-based software application. This study will replicate the intervention from a previous clinical trial conducted in the UK during the Covid-19 lockdown in 2020/21 (NCT04418362) and extend it by examining EEG activity before, during, and after the intervention, alongside outcome measures, including changes in pain intensity and severity, sleep, mood and quality of life. Ten participants will take part in pre-intervention assessments followed by four weeks of EEG baseline readings (5 times per week for 5 minutes), eight weeks of NFB treatment (5 times per week for 40 mins), and 12 weeks of post treatment EEG baselines readings (5 times per week for 5 minutes). Participants will be provided with training and detailed instructions on how to self-administer the NFB treatment using a bespoke headset and tablet-based software application in the comfort of their own homes. Assessments will be conducted at Week 0 (pre-intervention), Week 4 (pre-NFB treatment), Week 12 (post NFB treatment) and at follow up points (Week 16, 20, and 24). It is anticipated this study will provide evidence of the safety, efficacy, reliability and validity of a low-cost non-pharmacological solution to the physical, psychological and social difficulties experienced by individuals with chronic neuropathic pain conducted within the NHS health system.
Participants will be testing with the home monitoring device over the course of their treatment. They are to self-test on days where they are due to be going into hospital for their routine pre-treatment blood tests. Participants will be asked to fill in interim questionnaires and a final questionnaire to answer the study objectives.
Many people have difficulties organising their behaviour and problem-solving (also known as executive function difficulties) after stroke. This can have serious, wide-ranging consequences for wellbeing and ability to regain independence. Currently, access to psychological interventions after stroke varies and there is not enough evidence to recommend a specific intervention for executive function difficulties after stroke. A short intervention was designed to help with executive function difficulties by making it easier to set goals and achieve them after stroke. The intervention is designed for online delivery to make it accessible to as many stroke survivors as possible. The present trial aims to investigate the acceptability and feasibility of a single blinded randomized controlled trial of this online executive function intervention (active intervention) compared to an online stroke psychoeducation intervention (control intervention).
This is a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of BPZE1 that includes virulent B. pertussis challenge followed by a safety follow-up.
It is estimated that around 20% of breast cancers (BC) in the UK are preventable through adherence to appropriate health behaviours, i.e., healthy diet, physical activity, limited alcohol, not smoking, and that women at increased risk of BC could benefit from greater decreases in risk than the general population via health behaviour changes. Young women (age <35 years) who are at increased risk of developing BC currently receive little or no information regarding health behaviours and BC risk, or support for behaviour change. This feasibility study aims to explore whether a novel app is acceptable to women at increased risk and could potentially engage them with improved health behaviours which could reduce their future risk of BC.
Objectives: - To evaluate the feasibility of delivering the Neuromuscular Bridges Self-Management Programme (NM Bridges) in addition to usual care. - To evaluate the feasibility of an implementation strategy package and identify barriers and facilitators to implementation of NM Bridges at a specialist neuromuscular centre. Type of trial: A hybrid II feasibility trial Trial design and methods:A hybrid trial which simultaneously investigates both the feasibility of NM Bridges, and the feasibility of a package of implementation strategies. Trial duration per participant: 4 months Estimated total trial duration: 1 year Planned trial sites: Single site Total number of participants planned: 60 Main inclusion/exclusion criteria: Participants will be over the age of 18, with a diagnosis of neuromuscular disease from a neurologist at the Queen Square Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases (CNMD). Participants will be deemed by healthcare professionals to have the capacity to give informed consent to participate in the research. Statistical methodology and analysis: This is a single-arm cohort study of feasibility of the NM Bridges intervention. The primary analysis will be of feasibility of conducting a trial of the intervention within a single pilot site. Secondary analysis will be calculation of effect sizes of patient reported outcome measures (PROMS). The investigators will also be interviewing participants and qualitative analysis methods will be used.