There are about 36633 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in France. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This is a multi-center, phase II study to determine the efficacy and safety of tisagenlecleucel in adult patients with relapsed or refractory FL.
The aim of the focal treatment HIFU is to destroy the cancer without causing side effects in contrast to radical treatments. Radical treatments (surgery or radiation therapy) are the standard therapies for patient with intermediate risk localized prostate cancer and good life expectancy (prostatectomy if life expectancy10 years) By destroying only the part of the gland that harbors cancer, it may indeed be possible to provide efficient cure of the disease while minimizing treatment-induced morbidity (incontinence and loss of potency). Around 20% of patients presented with a unilateral tumor: this patients are currently treated radically. No study published papers reported outcomes of a large population (>100) with intermediate risk cancers treated with Focal-HIFU (conducted with the Focal One® device). Focal therapy must be only offer within clinical trial setting (EAU (European Association of Urology) Guidelines ). The aim of this cohort will be to determine the success rate of Focal-HIFU in this intermediate risk population. The result the study will be used for calculation the arms of a future random study
The objective of CLI-06657AA1-04 (formerly PB-102-F60) is to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy parameters of 1 mg/kg pegunigalsidase alfa administered intravenously every other week in adult Fabry patients who have successfully completed studies PB-102-F03, PB-102-F20 or PB-102-F30.
This study consists of several parts: dose escalation, dose expansion, dose expansion in Chinese participants residing in China, and coformulation. Dose escalation is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of MK-4830 monotherapy administration (Arms A and B) and in combination with pembrolizumab (Arm C). Dose expansion is to evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) of MK-4830 in combination with pembrolizumab (Arms A-F); evaluate the safety and tolerability of MK-4830 administered in combination with pembrolizumab, carboplatin, and pemetrexed (Arm G) and of MK-4830 administered in combination with pembrolizumab and lenvatinib (Arm H); evaluate the safety, tolerability and ORR of MK-4830 in combination with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (Arms I-L); and evaluate the safety and tolerability of MK-4830 in combination with pembrolizumab in Chinese participants from China (Arm M). The coformulation part (Arm N) evaluates the safety and tolerability of MK-4830A (coformulation of MK-4830 800 mg + pembrolizumab 200 mg). There is no formal hypothesis testing in this study.
This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of tiragolumab plus atezolizumab compared with placebo plus atezolizumab in chemotherapy-naive patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic PD-L1-selected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), excluding patients with a sensitizing EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.
Hearing impairment is the most frequent sensory deficit in humans and affects one newborn out of 500. The prevalence rises to 3,5/1000 in teenagers due to retarded forms. Most of hearing impairments (about two thirds) have a genetic origin, with recessive, dominant or X-linked mode of inheritance. Some rare forms can be linked to mitochondrial DNA. Molecular diagnosis (i.e. defining the molecular basis of the disease, genes and precise DNA variants) is essential for the follow-up of patients and families. The project intends to perform exome sequencing on 30 samples of families presenting with hearing impairment. Families have been included based on the genetic origin of the hearing impairment (familial cases) and the exclusion of the involvement of 74 known deafness genes. Exome sequencing (sequencing of the coding regions of all known genes, about 22,000) in these cases may underly new gene/disease relationships.
The study will integrate the efficacy of combining the anti programmed death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) agent atezolizumab with the current standard of care in Stage IVB , persistent or recurrent carcinoma of the cervix, namely cisplatin or carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab. It will be explored the combination of bevacizumab plus atezolizumab, with no patient selection based on PD-L1 expression, allowing an all-comer assessment of atezolizumab activity. The study is a randomized open label phase III trial to investigate the impact of atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab and cisplatin or carboplatin /paclitaxel chemotherapy on overall survival and will employ the intent to treat principle, and random assignment to one of the 2 arms will be balanced according to disease histology (squamous cell carcinoma vs adenocarcinoma), prior platinum therapy as a radiation sensitizer (no prior cis-Radiotherapy (RT) versus prior cis-RT) and chemotherapy backbone (cisplatin vs carboplatin). This trial will be run in an open label design due to the following considerations: the control arm is the standard of care for women diagnosed with metastatic, persistant or recurrent cervical cancer because of its impact on overall survival and the primary endpoint of the study is overall survival (OS), so blinding is not needed to ensure a robust assessment.
This 2-part study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) compared to placebo in participants with surgically resected high-risk Stage II melanoma. Participants in Part 1 will receive either pembrolizumab or placebo in a double-blind design every 3 weeks (Q3W) for up to 17 cycles/~1 year (each cycle = 21 days). Participants who complete the initial treatment of 17 cycles of pembrolizumab in Part 1 and experience disease recurrence may be eligible for re-challenge with pembrolizumab at the same dose and schedule of 200 mg Q3W (21-day cycles) for up to 35 cycles (up to ~2 years) in Part 2 in an open label design. Participants who complete the initial treatment of placebo and experience disease recurrence may be eligible to switch over to pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W (21-day cycles) for up to 35 cycles (up to ~2 years) in Part 2 in an open label design. The primary hypothesis of this study is that pembrolizumab increases recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared to placebo. Per protocol, response/ progression or adverse events (AEs) during re-challenge/switch-over in Part 2 will not be counted towards the RFS outcome measure or safety outcome measures respectively.
This is an open label, phase I/II clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 cycles of durvalumab without (Arm A) or with (Arm B) tremelimumab in association with ddMVAC as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with MIUC.
Aortic insufficiency (IA) is defined as an abnormal regurgitation of blood from the aorta to the left ventricle in diastole, due to a lack of tightness of the aortic valves. It represents about 10% of valvular pathologies but the annual mortality of nonoperated patients can be as high as 10% to 20%. The quantification of AI is therefore important as it can remain perfectly asymptomatic for a long time. Doppler echocardiography is currently the key examination to confirm the presence of valvulopathy, to allow positive diagnosis of valve leakage regardless of location, to specify the etiology and mechanism of regurgitation. The quantification of IA requires, in transthoracic ultrasound, to take into account many parameters that individually have all certain limitations. The recommendations are therefore to have an integrative approach considering a combination of different parameters and an overall interpretation. This makes it possible to evaluate with greater precision the importance of the leak. Thus, there is the difficulty of quantifying moderate and severe AI for lack of a truly unique criterion. One of the evaluation criteria commonly used in transthoracic ultrasound is diastolic regurgitation in the aortic arch but this assessment is sometimes difficult. The left subclavian artery (SCG) is more accessible than the aortic arch in terms of the ultrasound window. The measurements will be easier to record since the vessel is more superficial and there are fewer air interpositions than for the aortic arch. The quantification of the AI based on this new element will be compared to the other previously validated ultrasound criteria. The investigators will use this study to describe the feasibility of collecting coronary flow in the artery (IVA), and they will compare systolic velocity, diastolic rate / systolic rate ratio compared to a control group without severe aortic insufficiency (grades 2 and 3). The flows recorded in the IVA will be compared to the importance of the aortic leakage according to its different modes of quantification (ultrasound and MRI). The aim of the study will be to show that diastolic reflux in the left subclavian artery is a marker of severe AI (grades 2 and 3) by comparing this regurgitation with that measured at the level of the aortic arch and other validated ultrasound criteria and cardiac MRI.