There are about 21071 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Spain. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This study assess the effectiveness of core stability exercises performed in subacute phase of stroke. Half of participants will receive conventional physiotherapy, while the other half will receive core stability exercises and core stability exercises plus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).
IMC-C103C is an immune mobilizing monoclonal T cell receptor against cancer (ImmTAC ®) designed for the treatment of cancers positive for the tumor-associated antigen MAGE-A4. This is a first-in-human trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IMC-C103C in adult patients who have the appropriate HLA-A2 tissue marker and whose cancer is positive for MAGE-A4.
Breast cancer management integrating surgery, systemic therapy and radiation therapy tends to systemic treatment as the first therapeutic option, continuing afterwards by surgery and radiation therapy with the scope of decreasing the locoregional treatment. This strategy implies doubts about what should be the locoregional treatment, because many patients have remissions and a significant number of them a complete response. The responses are associated with better clinical outcome although there are doubts about they are a surrogate marker of survival. Nodal irradiation after systemic treatment in patients with breast cancer it is under discussion, particularly in the case of patients with initial clinical involvement experiencing complete remission. For this reason, some groups decide irradiation of all nodal regions and others choose no irradiation of the lymph nodes at all. To clarify this discussion the present study is proposed. The "One Step Nucleic Amplification" (OSNA) is a technique developed by Sysmex Corporation that allows a complete analysis of sentinel nodes and provides a quantification of the tumor marker Cytokeratin 19 (CK19) messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) in the sentinel node. The result is expressed by the Tumour Load as number of copies per microliter. This technique has shown its diagnostic ability both without primary systemic treatment and after primary systemic treatment, being more reproducible than conventional processes. In spite of this, fits to mention that the studies of validation used to obtain the European Conformity (CE) mark only included patients without previous systemic treatment to the surgery.
This study [contRAst 2 (201791: NCT03970837)] is a phase 3, randomized, multicenter, double blind study to assess the safety and efficacy of GSK3196165 in combination with csDMARD(s), for the treatment of adult participants with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have had an inadequate response to csDMARD(s) or bDMARD(s). The study will consist of a screening phase of up to 6 weeks followed by a 52 week treatment phase in which participants will be randomized in a ratio of 6:6:3:1:1:1 to receive GSK3196165 150 milligrams (mg) subcutaneous (SC) weekly, GSK3196165 90 mg SC weekly, tofacitinib capsules (cap) 5 mg twice a day or placebo (three arms, each placebo arm will have 12 weeks placebo followed by 40 weeks active treatment) respectively, all in combination with csDMARD(s). Participants who, in investigator's judgement will benefit from extended treatment with GSK3196165 may be included in the long-term extension study [contRAst X (209564: NCT04333147)]. For those participants who do not continue into the long term-extension study, there will be an 8 week safety follow-up visit following the treatment phase.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the major pathological response (MPR) rate of canakinumab given as a neoadjuvant treatment, either as single agent or in combination with pembrolizumab, in addition to evaluate the MPR of pembrolizumab as a single agent and the dynamic of the tumor microenvironment changes on treatment.
Background: Despite management improvement in lasts years, S.aureus bacteremia leads to high morbidity and mortality. For over 50 years, methicillin-susceptible S.aureus (MSSA) bacteremia standard treatment was cloxacillin. Previous studies using different therapies and combination treatment fall to improve survival in these patients. Aim: to demonstrate the efficacy of the cloxacillin and fosfomycin combination administered during the first week of treatment, compared with cloxacillin monotherapy in patients with MSSA bacteremia in treatment success. Methods: A multicentre, superiority, open-label, randomized, phase IV-III, two-armed parallel (1:1) groups clinical trial. Adult patients with MSSA bacteremia will be randomized to Combination therapy group: patients will receive intravenous cloxacillin 2g/4h and fosfomycin 3 g/6h for the duration of 7 days treatment, or Standard therapy group: patients will receive intravenous cloxacillin 2g/4h for the duration of 7 days IV treatment. After the first week, antibiotic treatment and duration will be decided by responsible clinician following clinical practice. The primary endpoint is the treatment success measured at day 7 of treatment; a composite endpoint defined by all of the following criteria met after randomization: patient alive at day 7 AND stable or improved quick SOFA score (compared with baseline) at day 7 AND fever resolved at day 7 AND negative blood cultures for S. aureus at day 7. In case of achieving statistical differences in the primary endpoint, investigators will perform a hierarchical analysis of the treatment success at Test of Cure visit (TOC, 12 weeks after randomization), defined by the presence of all of the following: patient alive at TOC AND no evidence of microbiological treatment failure defined as isolation of S. aureus from blood culture or other sterile site from day 8 after randomization until TOC. Investigators have assumed a 74% of treatment success in monotherapy group. Accepting an alpha risk of 0.05 and a beta risk of 0.2 in a two-sided test, 183 subjects are necessary in first group and 183 in the second to find a statistically significant difference of 12%. It has been anticipated a drop-out rate of 5%. Discussion: Randomized studies assessing efficacy of different treatment in MSSA bacteremia are lacking. This study could help to improve knowledge about MSSA bacteremia and whether combined treatment with cloxacillin and fosfomycin could improve outcomes compared with standard treatment.
The primary objective is to determine if BIIB093 reduces brain contusion expansion by Hour 96 when compared to placebo. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the effects of BIIB093 on acute neurologic status, functional outcomes, and treatment requirements, to further differentiate the mechanism of action of BIIB093 on contusion expansion by examining differential effects on hematoma and edema expansion, and to determine if BIIB093 improves survival at Day 90 when compared to placebo.
This study provides an opportunity for subjects in the REFALS (3119002; NCT03505021) study to continue treatment with oral levosimendan. The study will also provide more information about long-term safety and effectiveness of oral levosimendan in patients with ALS. This is an open-label study, so that all eligible subjects that complete the double-blind REFALS study (48-weeks of treatment) will have the opportunity to receive oral levosimendan treatment. The primary objective, in addition to continuing treatment for subjects enrolled in the REFALS study, is to evaluate long-term safety of oral levosimendan in ALS patients. Another important objective is to explore long-term effectiveness of oral levosimendan in the treatment of patients with ALS. This study is open only to patients taking part in the REFALS study.
The purpose of the protocol is to estimate the progression-free survival (PFS) rate in subjects diagnosed with PanNET, according to investigator assessment, at 24 months after treatment initiation with lanreotide 120 mg every 28 days.
Patients with rectoceles may present a variety of symptoms such as pelvic pressure, obstructive defecation or discomfort during sexual intercourse. The main symptom of the patient probably ends up conditioning if the patient is referred to a gynaecologist or a colorectal surgeon. Different surgical techniques have been described to repair the rectocele. The posterior colporrhaphy is the preferred approach for most gynaecologists, while the transanal repair is the most common approach for the majority of colorectal surgeons. However, the small number of prospective studies, the inconsistent inclusion criteria and the variability of the outcome measures make difficult to know what the ideal surgical approach for a rectocele repair would be. Gynaecologists usually do not assess defecatory function before a rectocele repair, and studies focused on obstructive defecation include patients with other co-existing pathologies (rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, enterocele) that may influence the success of the repair. Moreover, functional disorders such as the paradoxical contraction of the external anal sphincter or the puborectalis muscle are not systematically reported. On the other hand, many surgeons have questioned the transvaginal approach because it has been reported that patients may present dyspareunia after the surgery, although it is not systematically evaluated. The hypothesis of the investigators is that the transvaginal approach for rectocele repair is an effective treatment for symptoms of obstructive defecation and is not associated with sexual dysfunction when the plication of the puborectalis muscle is not performed.