There are about 11304 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Denmark. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the effects of online medical education in PhD students. The main question it aims to answer is: What is the effect of onsite compared to online research courses on theoretical knowledge of research methodology and motivation for young medical researchers? Participants will join 20 research courses which are computer randomised to be delivered online (intervention) or onsite (control group) with 10-12 PhD students of each course (200-240 participants). Participants will be followed for up to two years after their course. The outcomes are - theoretical learning (main) - academic achievements - motivation - self-efficacy Researchers will compare online and onsite research courses to see if there is a difference in theoretical learning, academic achievements, motivation and self-efficacy.
The goal of this observational study is to learn about the genetic background for the development of optic disc drusen. The main question is: • Can one or more candidate genes be found? Participants will have a blood sample taken and answer a questionnaire.
Treatment of displaced distal forearm fractures (DFF) in children have traditionally been closed reduction and pin fixation, although they might heal and remodel without manipulation, with no functional impairment. No randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been published comparing the patient-reported functional outcome after non-surgical and surgical treatment of displaced DFF in children. This is a multicentre RCT. The aim of the trial is to investigate the patient-reported functional outcome after non-surgical treatment of displaced distal forearm fractures (DFF) in children. We will include 44 children aged 4-10 years with a displaced DFF. They will be offered inclusion, if the on-duty orthopedic surgeon finds indication for surgical intervention. If the parents/guardians consent to participate, the children will be allocated equally to non-surgical treatment (intervention) or surgical treatment of surgeon's choice (comparator). We will follow the children during one year, where they will be seen after 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome is the between-group difference in 12 months Quick Disabilities Arm Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common type of arthritis, characterized by pain and physical disability. More than 10% of persons > 55 years have symptomatic OA, primarily involving the knees. Knee arthroplasty is considered a successful orthopaedic procedure in progressed knee OA (KOA) with severe pain and disability where non-surgical treatments have been tried. It has long been recognized that injury to the body, either from trauma or surgery causes an inflammatory response. As TKA is considered a more invasive procedure compared with UKA, TKA and UKA may not trigger inflammatory reactions of the same magnitude. Differences in inflammatory response between TKA and UKA could help explain why differences in outcome are present, despite both procedures being technically successful. Even though knee arthroplasty is a very common and successful procedure, there are no existing studies comparing the invasiveness of TKA and UKA. As morbidity and mortality rates differ between the groups, the aim of this prospective cohort study is to investigate whether the post-operative inflammatory responses differ between TKA and UKA, and secondarily whether this difference can explain the difference in outcome between the two procedures. The investigators hypothesize that TKA generates a larger postoperative systemic inflammatory response compared with UKA due to more extensive periarticular soft tissue and bone trauma. The study's primary outcome is C-reactive Protein (CRP) measured in blood 24 hours after surgery (22-26 hours after surgery ~ day 1). Participants which are candidates for either a TKA or a UKA will through serial blood test measurement have their postoperative systemic inflammatory response measured. This further will be correlated to the clinical and functional outcomes over a 2-years postoperative follow-up period.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of two medicinal products, rituximab, and zanubrutinib, compared to rituximab monotherapy in patients with Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma (SMZL), previously untreated and who need systemic treatment. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Is the combination rituximab and zanubrutinib a more effective therapy than rituximab monotherapy? - Is the combination therapy, rituximab and zanubrutinib, well tolerated? Study participants will be put into one of the two treatment groups (rituximab and zanubrutinib or rituximab alone) for a maximum of two years and will undergo regular visits until three years from treatment start.
The purpose of the study is to investigate the effect of different blood flow restriction (BFR) interventions on muscle function and adaptations both in healthy well-trained individuals and individuals diagnosed with COPD.
Mortality following elective colorectal cancer surgery range between 2.5-6% and increase for the elderly and frail patient regardless of T-stage. Around 80% of the patients who present with a colon cancer and is in a condition where surgery is possible will be offered resection of the tumor. A part of the colon is always removed together with the lymph nodes in order to ensure that cancer cells are not left behind. The risk of lymph node metastasis is dependent on several histopathological characteristics of the tumor. The overall risk of lymph node metastases is less than 20 % in patients with early colon cancer. This indicates that the majority of patients with early colon cancer have no benefit of additional resection besides local tumor excision. The alternative to resecting a larger part of the bowel is to make more focused surgery only resecting a small part of the bowel part through a combination of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques. This new organ sparing approach is called Combined Endoscopic Laparoscopic Surgery (CELS). The investigators aimed to examinate the hypothesis that organ preserving approach (CELS) provides superior quality of recovery in elderly frail patients with small colon cancers when compared with standard surgery in RCT.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test ketone bodies in healthy elderly and young individuals. The main question it aims to answer are: • Do ketone bodies improve skeletal muscle function? Participants will ingest a ketone monoester and skeletal muscle function will then be evaluated by: - Special magnetic imaging techniques - Intravenous infusion of tracer-marked nutrients - Performance tests on a ergometer bike and in a dynamometer Researchers will compare the outcomes between within the young and elderly groups and between the young and the elderly group to investigate if age has an effect on the outcomes.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer (1.8 million cases) and the third most common cause of cancer-related death (0.8 million deaths) worldwide in 2018, and rectal cancer accounts for roughly one-third of CRC. The main curative treatment modality for patients with rectal cancer is surgery, often combined with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (RT). The global recognition of total mesorectal excision (TME), that decreased locoregional recurrence (LRR) by itself, questioned the need for radiotherapy (RT) before or after surgery. Several randomized trials have demonstrated the importance of preoperative RT (short course RT or long course chemo-radiotherapy (CRT)) in reducing LRR, in patients with high-risk rectal cancer. However, RT or CRT does not improve overall survival, and in addition neoadjuvant RT/CRT followed by TME is associated with perioperative morbidity and the risk is increasing with age. Therefore, ongoing trials are testing other strategies, such as the omission of (C)RT or even avoidance of surgery. In May 2022, a presentation with simultaneous NEJM publication showed that 14/14 patients with dMMR rectal cancer obtained complete response after six months (9 cycles every 3 weeks) of immunotherapy (dostarlimab). Thus, the investigators have now become confident that immunotherapy without surgery will be the "new standard", and the investigators will recommend a W&W strategy in patients with rectal cancer obtaining major tumor shrinkage and these patients will be followed carefully with clinical and molecular evaluation (which was not part of the NEJM paper). No patient in the NEJM paper had progressive disease and therefore the investigators recommend a second cycle of immunotherapy (instead of resection in unclear cases) and re-evaluation. The investigators are confident that 1 or 2 cycles of immunotherapy will result in complete radiological, pathological, and molecular response in a substantial number of patients and this short duration of therapy will reduce toxicity and especially drug costs. In conclusion, immunotherapy in patients with dMMR CRC tumors may completely eradicate the primary cancer and regional lymph nodes leading to a possibility for organ-sparing medical treatments, and the investigators are confident that this new strategy of 1 or 2 cycles of immunotherapy will be the future standard of care, and in Denmark the investigators have the chance to monitor these patients closely with clinical and high-level molecular follow-up.
The purpose of the present project is to investigate if the restitution time from loading in an exercise-based 12 weeks rehabilitation regime for patellar tendinopathy influences the clinical outcome, tendon structure and function. The investigators hypothesize that greater restitution from loading (1 exercise day per week) will yield a greater positive clinical outcome, and tissue structure and function in patients with patellar tendinopathy compared to less restitution (3 exercise days per week), when impact activities are restricted in both groups.