There are about 25560 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Germany. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The pilot study aims to compare the results of using a new respirator (OPTIFLOW TM-High-Flow-Machine) with those from Standard-Oxygen-Therapy during the stabilization of patients who have been hospitalized due to acute heart failure. We expect a faster and more effective stabilization after acute cardial decompensation among the patients with the High-Flow-machine. The study should show whether the use of High-Flow-Therapy leads to a relevant improvement in terms of objective clinical parameters of heart failure like those for cardial-renal syndrome, changes in the nt-pro-BNP, weight loss, changes in the diameter of the inferior vena cava, in terms of the degree of shortness of breath and decompensation, and whether subjective clinical symptoms like dyspnea and quality of life differ between the two groups of patients. The investigators see the primary outcome of the study as the improvement of the cardial-renal syndrome as a sign of the more effective stabilisation compared to the standard therapy. Furthermore, the investigators expect a quicker decrease in serum creatinine and an improvement in the creatinine clearance through therapy with the High-Flow-Machine. In terms of secondary outcomes of the study, the investigators are interested in also comparing e.g., the duration of hospital stays, 90-day mortality, and rehospitalisation within three months. Here, the investigators expect a quicker improvement in the subjective shortness of breath of the patients who are treated using the Hifh-Flow-Machine. Moreover, we believe that along with the individual subjective improvements (quality of life survey), the patients will experience a quicker release from the hospital and in this way, lead to a healthcare economic improvement among patients with repeated hospitalizations who usually have chronic problems. It is also of great interest to us, whether the biomarker BNP is an appropriate parameter for determining the faster stabilization of the patient and whether the degree of improvement of subjective dyspnea is correlated with the time needed until the patient has been stabilised.
Phase 3, randomized, controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral pacritinib compared to Best Available Therapy (BAT) in patients with thrombocytopenia and primary or secondary myelofibrosis.
There is no standard treatment for Merkel cell carcinoma(MCC), as no randomized trials have been conducted to establish standard of care. Despite a sizable number of objective responses induced by combination cyototoxic chemotherapy, a prolongation of patients overall survival has never been demonstrated. This open-label, randomized, double-arm, multi-centre, phase II study of F16IL2 in combination with paclitaxel versus paclitaxel monotherapy, proposes to test the therapeutic efficacy of F16IL2 plus paclitaxel in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma, who are not amenable to surgery. A total of 90 patients with Merkel cell carcinoma will be enrolled and treated during the study; 45 patients will receive the combination treatment of F16IL2 and paclitaxel (Arm A), and 45 patients will receive paclitaxel monotherapy (Arm B).
The BRAF inhibitors dabrafenib and vemurafenib belong both two a new class of potent anti-cancer drugs and are highly efficacious in tumors harboring the BRAF V600E mutation. Both drugs seem to be equally efficacious; however, their toxicity profile seems to differ. Serious phototoxicity has been observed in ~ 30% of patients treated with vemurafenib and in ~2 percent of patients treated with dabrafenib. These phototoxic reactions have developed in spite of informing the patients of this possible adverse event and instructing them to protect themselves. Manifestation of phototoxic reactions depends on the patient's habits of exposure and their efforts to protect themselves. The true frequency of photosensitivity can only be established by systematic photo-testing. In dermatology, standard test procedures with different UV-wavelengths and dosages have been established and the primary goal of this study will be to clarify the true rate of photosensitivity by these two BRAF-inhibitors. Furthermore, systematic experience will be collected how to best protect patients from phototoxic events. Dabrafenib and Vemurafenib are commercially available and considered standard of care for BRAF mutant metastatic melanoma in Germany. As the number of patients will not allow any conclusion with regard to efficacy or safety of vemurafenib, patients randomized to vemurafenib in part 2 will only remain on study until completion of phototesting.
Acute dyspnea is a common chief complaint of patients presenting to the emergency department. Patients with acute dyspnea display a high mortality rate. In-hospital mortality is as high as 10% during hospitalization and up to 30% within 6 months of follow-up. The Triple A Initiative Study is designed to improve the coordination of care for patients with acute dyspnea alerting the Emergency Medical Service (EMS). We hypothesize that the coordination of care starting at the EMS level including point-of-care testing of the cardiac biomarker NTproBNP will support preclinical and clinical diagnostic clarification. Treatment deriving from earlier diagnostic clarification will reduce length of stay in the hospital, treatment costs and improve patient's outcome.
This is a multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, Phase 3 trial in subjects with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have demonstrated either stable disease or objective response following primary concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CRT), comparing overall survival (OS) time in subjects treated with tecemotide versus subjects treated with tecemotide-matching placebo.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the superiority of left atrial appendage occlusion in comparison to oral anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist (INR 2-3) related to the frequency of occurrence of at least one bleeding classified as moderate or major within 24 months.
The purpose of this 2-stage, 2-cohort Phase 2 trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of talazoparib (also known as BMN 673) in subjects with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer with a deleterious germline BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 mutation. Subjects will be assigned to either Cohort 1 or 2 based on prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease: - Cohort 1) Subjects with a documented PR or CR to a prior platinum-containing regimen for metastatic disease with disease progression > 8 weeks following the last dose of platinum; or - Cohort 2) Subjects who have received > 2 prior chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease and who have had no prior platinum therapy for metastatic disease
The objective of this trial was to provide 6 months of safety follow-up for children and adolescents with dilutional (euvolemic or hypervolemic) hyponatremia who had previously participated in a tolvaptan hyponatremia trial and to assess the efficacy of tolvaptan in increasing serum sodium for those participants who received optional continuing tolvaptan treatment of variable duration (up to 6 months).
The aim of the pragmatic randomized study is to evaluate whether additional relaxation technique is more effective in the reduction of chronic low back pain compared to usual care alone.