There are about 36818 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in China. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This is a randomized, Open-label, Phase Ib/IIa study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SPH4336 monotherapy or in combination with Cadonilimab in the patients with selected advanced solid tumors.
The goal of this observational study is to learn about 18F-FAPI-RGD PET/CT imaging in assessing rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Participants will undergo clinical evaluation and 18F-FAPI-RGD PET/CT examination.
Currently, the gold standard method to estimate CO is the thermodilution technique, pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) and PiCCO system included, however, the invasiveness and complexity of the thermodilution technique have limited their usefulness in many clinical scenarios. By measuring the carotid blood flow, continuous carotid doppler technique has been reported to noninvasively estimate cardiac output (CO) and other parameters related to cardiac contractility and fluid status in various cardiovascular disorders. However, to the best of our knowledge, few study has been reported to evaluate the consistency of this technique in cardiac surgery patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the tracking ability of CO changes measured by continuous carotid doppler technique in cardiac surgery patients, use the thermodilution technique as the referenced.
Main objectives: To evaluate the benefit of SI-B001+ docetaxel on overall survival (OS) of bidotaxel. To evaluate the benefit of SI-B001+ Docetaxel over Docetaxel's progression-free survival (PFS) based assessment. Secondary objectives: To evaluate the investigator-evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) benefit of SI-B001+ Docetaxel against docetaxel; To evaluate the difference of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and duration of response (DOR) between SI-B001+ docetaxel and bidocetaxel. To evaluate the type, frequency and severity of adverse events (TEAE) and drug-related adverse events (TRAE) during treatment with SI-B001+ docetaxel in comparison with docetaxel. The pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of SI-B001 will be evaluated. The immunogenicity of SI-B001 will be evaluated. Subject quality of life.
The project was undertaking by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University in China. In order to report the efficacy and safety of Hetrombopag plus high-dose dexamethasone for the treatment of adults with newly-diagnosed primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP).
The goal of this study is to compare the postoperative anal function of patients with ultra-low rectal cancer after Parks operation (colon anal anastomosis) and Bacon operation (colon anal pull-out anastomosis), which may provide clinical evidence for the improvement of anal function and quality of life. The main questions it aims to answer are: the difference of anal function 1 year after surgery type of study: clinical trial participant population: patients with low rectal cancer Participants will receive Parks operation of Bacon operation If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare Parks and Bacon operation to see if the anal function 1 year after surgery is different.
Background: Recently, there has been increasing attention on the application of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) in ischemic stroke. This innovative technique involves non-invasive electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve. A controlled study by Dawson et al. (2021), conducted using a randomized, double-blind approach, has demonstrated that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) when paired with motor function training, can effectively promote the improvement of motor dysfunction in stroke patients. In the same year, the Food and Drug Administration approved the use of VNS, alongside motor rehabilitation training, for upper extremity dysfunction caused by stroke. However, it is worth noting that VNS requires surgical procedures with contraindications. Consequently, researchers are exploring taVNS as a potential alternative intervention. Compared to VNS, taVNS offers a low-risk and user-friendly intervention that eliminates the need for surgery and the associated postoperative complications. A recent meta-analysis has shown that the efficacy of taVNS in upper extremity rehabilitation for stroke patients can be comparable to that of VNS. Therefore, pairing taVNS with motor training holds promise as a valuable clinical tool for post-stroke rehabilitation. Methods and Design: This study presents a protocol for a single-center randomized, double-blind controlled trial. A total of 150 participants will be enrolled and randomly assigned to one of three groups (Group 1, Group 2, or Group 3) in a 1:1:1 ratio. Each patient will undergo a total of 14 treatment sessions. In Group 1, patients will receive motor training paired with taVNS. In Group 2, patients will receive motor training and taVNS interventions, seperately. In Group 3, patients will receive motor training paired with sham taVNS. Primary and secondary outcome measures will be assessed at baseline and after taVNS treatment. The primary outcome will be determined by evaluating the behavioral response to treatment, using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE). Discussion: This study aims to elucidate the role of paired taVNS in the rehabilitation of upper extremity dysfunction in stroke patients. The researchers propose a novel approach by pairing taVNS with individualized training actions, utilizing electromyography (EMG) during motor training to precisely trigger taVNS.
In this study, participants with high risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who are BCG Naïve or BCG Unresponsive and are considered ineligible for or have refused to undergo radical cystectomy, will receive RC48-ADC in combination with gemcitabine.
The purpose of this first in human study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK),and pharmacodynamics (PD) of HS-10390 in healthy subjects.
This study is a phase 1 single dose escalation study of SHR-2001 in healthy subjects. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability,pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of SHR-2001 in healthy subjects