There are about 9403 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Switzerland. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
In a current first-in-man study, called Stimulation Movement Overground (STIMO) (NCT02936453; CER-VD: 04-2014; Swissmedic: 2016-MD-0002), epidural electrical stimulation (EES) of the spinal cord is applied to enable individuals with severe spinal cord injury (SCI) to complete intensive locomotor neurorehabilitation training. In this clinical feasibility study, it was demonstrated that EES results in an immediate enhancement of locomotor functions and that when applied repeatedly as part of a neurorehabilitation program, EES can progressively improve leg motor control in individuals with severe SCI. Mechanistically, EES acts trans-synaptically upon spinal circuitries through the electrical stimulation of proprioceptive fibers. It is assumed that this stimulation does not increase the level of availability of monoamine neurotransmitters below the SCI level, which are essential for lower extremity movement generation. Specifically, in a non-injured individual, dopamine and serotonin synthesized in the brain and brainstem are released by fibers diffusely innervating the spinal cord, serving to critically mediate excitability of motor neurons and interneurons in lumbar and sacral spinal level. Spinal cord injury would partially or entirely disrupt these modulation pathways, resulting in a detrimental lack of crucial neurotransmitters below the injury level. This lack of endogenous neurotransmitters could potentially be compensated for by pharmacological agents promoting the neurochemical environment necessary for locomotion.
The present study is a monocentric, observational, single arm, study, with the aim to determinate the ability of FFR-CT to exclude or confirm the presence of hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis, compared to coronary angiography in high-risk acute coronary syndrome patients.
Background: In Switzerland, about 6000 individuals live with the consequences of a spinal cord injury (Brinkhof et al, 2016). One of the major goals after an incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) is to regain walking function. To this end, different approaches are used in rehabilitation such as treadmill-based, robotic-assisted (exoskeleton or end-effector) and conventional gait training. According to current literature, the superiority of one of these approaches remains unclear (Mehrholz, Harvey, Thomas, and Elsner, 2017); In the research on gait rehabilitation after iSCI, recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) found no statistical differences between conventional gait training and robotic-assisted gait training. Nevertheless, according to the comparison of effect sizes obtained from these training, these trials suggested that the conventional training approach leads to larger improvements in gait capacity when compared to robotic-assisted therapy (Field-Fote and Roach, 2011; Nooijen, Ter Hoeve, and Field-Fote, 2009). Therefore, these trials highly recommended further research considering these aspects. However, in clinical settings, the implementation of such systematic and intense training sessions remains challenging. The present study aims to test the hypothesis that conventional training might have larger effect sizes on gait capacity and to evaluate the feasibility of such systematic training in a clinical setting of inpatient rehabilitation. Objectives: To contribute to the current knowledge on best clinical practice in gait rehabilitation within the iSCI population. More specifically, the study objectives are two-fold: A first objective is to compare the effects of conventional training, end-effector based therapy and the combination of these interventions on the gait ability of iSCI. A second objective is the evaluation of the feasibility of systematic gait training protocols in a clinical setting. Participants: Individuals with motor incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI), presenting a traumatic or non-traumatic iSCI with an injury onset <6 months. Intervention: Participants will be trained in one of the three groups by trained physical therapists during 10 sessions, 3x/week with an average duration of 30 minutes. Outcomes: To attain the first objective the effects will be quantified by the following main outcomes: Walking capacity (independence), walking speed, and safety. Feasibility of the systematic intervention will be evaluated using the drop-outs of therapy interventions.
Urinary tract infections (UTI) represent one of the most common morbidities in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and reason for re-hospitalization. The consequences of recurrent UTI are a decrease in quality of life and considerable health costs. Immunomodulation therapy with UroVaxom is a very promising method for the prevention of UTI, however data in individuals with SCI are very limited. The primary objective of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility (recruitment rate, patient attrition, compliance, assessment procedures etc.) of a main trial. A secondary objective is to collect data for an informed sample size calculation. Furthermore, the clinical and biological changes after immunomodulation therapy will be investigated. This is a randomized, placebo-controlled, mono-centric pilot study investigating the feasibility of a main trial regarding the effectiveness of immunomodulation with UroVaxom in the prevention of UTI and the effect on the immune system in individuals with acute SCI during primary rehabilitation. There will be two parallel groups of 12 participants each. Group allocation will be based on a block-randomization stratified according to sex. Study participants and outcome assessors will be blinded to the group allocation. The nursing staff will be unblinded and will administer the treatment and the placebo. Study participants will either receive Uro-Vaxom (one tablet / day) or an off-the-shelf placebo for 90 days. After termination of the treatment, the study participants will be followed for 12 months. Blood and urine samples will be taken before and 90 days, 6 months and 12 months after treatment start.
Inhibitors of sodium-dependent glucose-transporter 2 (SGLT-2 inhibitors, including dapagliflozin) inhibit glucose reabsorption in renal tubular cells, hereby increasing glycosuria in the hyperglycemic state. Its mechanisms of action are independent of insulin, which makes SGLT-2 inhibitors a potential adjunct to insulin in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). However, a higher risk for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) was reported in patients with T1DM taking SGLT-2 inhibitors. DKA depends on an accumulation of ketone bodies in the blood stream, which equals an accumulation of acids that lead to acidosis. The underlying mechanisms of this observation are unknown. Ketone body production depends on the molar ratio of glucagon to insulin, with insulin suppressing but glucagon stimulating ketone body production. This translates into higher production during relative insulin deficiency, carbohydrate deficiency, and prolonged fasting, which occurs during sickness but also physical exercise. Physical exercise is a recommended cornerstone in the treatment of T1DM and current treatment guidelines recommend both, reductions of insulin doses and ingestion of additional carbohydrates to avoid hypoglycemic events. These adaptions might increase relative insulin deficiency, hyperglycemia and glycaemic variability, which might in turn promote ketone body production. The addition of SGLT-2 inhibitors further may promote ketogenesis even though there are reports of SGLT-2 inhibitors increase Glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1) in patients with T1DM. GLP-1 is a suppressor of glucagon secretion. In summary, knowledge about the effects of SGLT-2 inhibition on ketone body production is scarce, especially during exercise in patients with T1DM. The study seeks to illustrate the effect of SGLT-2 inhibition on glycemic variability and ketone body production during and after recreational exercise in patients with T1DM. The results of study 2 will provide the basis for future studies investigating the underlying mechanisms of potentially modified ketone body production during and after exercise under SGLT-2 inhibition.
The popliteal plexus block has been described as an alternative analgesic postoperative pain treatment for total knee arthroplasty. It consists of injecting local anaeshetics inside the distal end of the adductor canal close to the adductor hiatus, adjacent to the femoral artery, between the medial vastus muscle and the adductor magnus muscle, in order to anesthetize the popliteal plexus. However, the analgesic efficacy has never been demonstrated in a randomized controlled trial. Therefore the objective of this study is to investigate the analgesic benefit of this block combined with a continuous femoral nerve block, on patients scheduled for total knee athroplasty.
Patients with severe CAR-T cell associated cytokine release syndrome (CRS) (defined as vasopressor dependent) will be treated with standard of care (SOC) + cytokine adsorption (6hourly for 24 hrs). Primary endpoint is the change in plasma IL-6 between 0 and 24 hrs.
We implement a prospective, randomized, unblinded, non-inferiority trial regarding the duration of systemic, targeted antibiotic therapy after the first surgical debridement for spine infection; randomizing 1:1 between 1. Six and twelve weeks of antibiotic therapy if there is an implant left in place 2. Three and six weeks of antibiotic therapy if there is no implant left
Phonak Hearing Devices pass through different development and study phases. At an early stage, feasibiltiy studies are conducted to investigate new algorithms, features and functions in an isolated manner. If the benefit is proven, their performance is then investigated regarding interpendency between all available algorithms, features and functions running in parallel in a hearing aid (pivotal/pre-validation studies) and, resulting from the pre-validation studies, they get optimized. Prior to product launch, the Phonak Hearing Systems get reviewed by a final quality control in terms of clinical trials. This is a pre-validation study, investigating improved algorithms, features, functions and wearing comfort. This will be a clinical investigation which will be conducted mono centric at Sonova AG Headquarters based in Stäfa (Switzerland).
This is a multi-center, non-randomised Phase 1b study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ATP128 alone or in combination with BI 754091 and of heterologous prime-boost ATP128 + VSV-GP128 in combination with BI 754091. ATP128 is a self-adjuvanted chimeric recombinant protein vaccine being developed in combination with programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) blockade for the treatment of microsatellite stable (MSS) patients not responding to PD-1 blockade. The PD-1 inhibitor being tested with ATP128 is the BI 754091 (Ezabenlimab) compound which belongs to the human immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) subclass of antibodies. VSV-GP is a recombinant chimeric vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV, Indiana strain Rhabdoviridae) which carries the envelope glycoprotein (GP) of the visceral non neurotropic WE-HPI strain of the Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV, Arenaviridae) instead of the native VSV glycoprotein (G) and is developed as integral part of the prime-boost regimen together with ATP128. The Sponsor plans to enrol 96 patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IV colorectal cancer coming form three different patient populations: - Cohort 1a: 6 patients with stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) having failed standard of care (SoC) therapies - Cohorts 1b, 2a, 2c: 30 patients with stage IV microsatellite stable/mismatch repair-proficient (MSS/MMRp) CRC being in stable disease (SD) or partial response (PR) after first line of SoC (4-6 months duration at minimum) - Cohorts 2b, 4b: 30 patients with stage IV MSS/MMRp liver-limited disease Patients eligible for this study will be enrolled in one of the 8 cohorts depending on their disease: - Patients in Cohort 1a will receive ATP128 as single agent - Patients in Cohorts 1b, 2a, 2b, 2c will receive ATP128 in combination with BI 754091 - Patients in Cohorts 3, 4a, 4b will receive ATP128 and VSV-GP128 in combination with BI 754091