There are about 28871 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Canada. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) will be a severe problem in Canada in the wake of COVID-19, especially for Military Members, Veterans, First Responders, and Healthcare Workers (MVFH). However, gold standard face-to-face PTSD treatments do not meet current MVFH needs, which requires virtual interventions and minimal healthcare resources. Recognizing the need for a virtual, low-resource PTSD intervention for MVFH with PTSD and their loved ones, the investigators developed Couple HOPES (Helping Overcome PTSD and Enhance Satisfaction). Couple HOPES is a secure, online self-help intervention for those with PTSD and their partners (www.couplehopes.com). However, MVFH are now particularly likely to be exposed to traumas related to COVID-19. It is essential to identify if Couple HOPES is safe and helpful for couples involving MVFH with COVID-19-related PTSD specifically. This project will therefore test the efficacy of Couple HOPES compared to a delayed waitlist control in 70 couples wherein one member is a MVFH with COVID-19-related PTSD. The investigators will examine if Couple HOPES is helpful in improving PTSD symptoms and relationship satisfaction for such couples, and if it is more or less helpful to this end for these couples compared to those with other forms of trauma exposure. 70 couples including a MVFH with COVID-19-related PTSD, will be randomly assigned to receive Couple HOPES or to a waitlist. PTSD symptoms and relationship satisfaction will be measured ~weekly during the intervention and one month after it. Related problems (e.g., depression, anxiety, healthcare use) will be measured before, in the middle of, after, and one month after, the intervention.
Chronic pain affects at least 10% of the global population but is often poorly managed, given the variable efficacy of available pharmacological treatments and the limited accessibility of multidisciplinary interventions. The legalization of cannabis in at least 14 countries and the increasing regulatory approval of cannabis preparations and synthetic cannabinoids and analogues have led to a growing interest in the use of medical cannabis products to manage chronic pain. This use is supported by research demonstrating important interactions between cannabinoids and the human endocannabinoid system and pain modulation pathways. While medical cannabis products are increasingly available to practitioners who treat pain, there is little evidence-based guidance for prescribing or titrating these treatments to manage chronic non-cancer pain. This prospective registry aims to assemble real-world data regarding the use of Spectrum Therapeutics (ST) medical cannabis products in subjects with chronic non-cancer pain in Canada. The registry will also assess treatment outcomes, including pain and related symptoms, global impressions of improvement, and change in concomitant pain medications (opioid use in particular), to better inform the utility of ST products for chronic non-cancer pain management. Primary Objective: • To describe patterns of physician selection of Spectrum Therapeutics (ST) medical cannabis treatment regimen, expressed as average daily dose of THC and CBD (in mg), and mode of administration (ingested or inhaled), in the management of chronic non-cancer pain in countries where these products are commercially available. Secondary Objectives: - To describe subject product and dose adjustment (under medical follow-up) over time. - To assess outcomes of treatment, including pain relief and effects on sleep, daily functioning, and quality of life. - To assess global impressions of treatment effectiveness as reported by subjects and physicians. - To assess changes in daily dose of opioids, other medications over time. Safety Objective: • To assess the safety and tolerability of ST products in subjects with chronic pain.
The study will consist of 2 periods: Double-blind Treatment and Open-Label Extension(OLE) Period. -Double-blind Treatment Period - This will be randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled part of the study which will be conducted in parallel groups, ie,1 group receiving the active treatment (PXT3003) and the other group receiving placebo. Primary endpoint of the study will be assessed at Month 15. -Open-label Extension (OLE) Period - All subjects completing Double-blind Treatment Period will be given an opportunity to enter the OLE Period of the study and receive the active treatment (PXT3003). The duration of the OLE Period will be based on Sponsor discretion, ie, Sponsor intends to keep the study open until the study drug PXT3003 is commercially available. During this period, the long-term safety and efficacy of PXT3003 will be assessed as an exploratory objective. Double-blind Treatment Period Objectives: Primary: To evaluate the efficacy of treatment with PXT3003 (a fixed-dose combination of [RS]-baclofen, naltrexone hydrochloride [HCl], and D-sorbitol) compared to placebo in subjects with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A (CMT1A). Secondary: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of PXT3003 treatment in subjects with CMT1A. Exploratory: To characterize the relationship between plasma biomarkers and response to PXT3003 treatment. OLE Period Objective: Exploratory: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of PXT3003.
A 2-year phase 3, multicentre, randomised, parallel-group, sham-controlled, double-masked study. Primary efficacy will be determined at Week 52.
The purpose of the ANT-006 study is to evaluate the bleeding profile of abelacimab relative to rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at moderate-to-high risk of stroke.
This study will compare the efficacy of an electronically-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (e-CBT) program versus a mental health coaching program to treat generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). This randomized trial intervention will provide the e-CBT and mental health coaching for GAD through a secure, online platform. Participants will be between the ages of 18 and 65 years with a confirmed diagnosis of GAD according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 5th Edition (DSM-5). Participants will either be offered an e-CBT program tailored to GAD or an online mental health coaching program over 12 weeks to address their anxiety symptoms. e-CBT participants will complete pre-designed modules and homework assignments while receiving personalized feedback and asynchronous interaction with a therapist through the platform. Participants in the coaching group will be contacted weekly through the online platform's chat feature. Therapists will ask the participants a series of pre-designed questions that revolve around a different theme each week to prompt conversation. Using clinically validated symptomology questionnaires, the efficacy of the e-CBT program will be compared to the coaching group. These questionnaires will be completed at baseline, week 6, week 12, and at a 6-month follow-up. Questionnaires include the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7 Item (GAD-7), and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale - 42 Item (DASS-42).
Study CC-93538-EE-001 is a Phase 3, multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled induction and maintenance study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CC- 93538 in adult and adolescent participants with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). The study will incorporate a 24-week Induction Phase followed by a 24-week Maintenance Phase. Participants will be randomized at the beginning of the study into 3 treatment arms: - Placebo for Induction and Maintenance - CC-93538 360 mg Subcutaneous (SC) once weekly for Induction followed by 360 mg SC once every other week for Maintenance - CC-93538 360 mg SC once weekly for Induction and Maintenance
This phase I trial is to find out the best dose, possible benefits and/or side effects of magrolimab in combination with dinutuximab in treating patients with neuroblastoma that has come back (relapsed) or does not respond to treatment (refractory) or relapsed osteosarcoma. Magrolimab and dinutuximab are monoclonal antibodies that may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. The combination of magrolimab and dinutuximab may shrink or stabilize relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma or relapsed osteosarcoma. In addition, this trial may help researchers find out if it is safe to give magrolimab and dinutuximab after surgery to remove tumors from the lungs.
Hip fracture is recognized as one of the most serious consequences of osteoporosis, less than half regain pre-fracture independence. 95% of all hip fractures in older adults are due to falls. Thus, reducing fall risk while restoring function post-hip fracture is critical. Many with fall-related hip fractures have cognitive impairment; cognitive impairment increases the risk of falls. The purpose of this 6-month proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to assess the efficacy of the home-based Otago Exercise Program (OEP) compared with usual care in reducing fall risk among older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and a fall-related hip fracture.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Foquest® on sleep, using actigraphy and sleep diaries, in children aged 6-12 compared to baseline on no medication. Sleep difficulties, including prolonged sleep onset latency and decreased total sleep time have a significant negative impact on the functioning of children. In adults, sleep deprivation may result in drowsiness and yawning. However, in children, this may manifest as mood and behavioural disturbances which may even mimic the classic symptoms of ADHD; hyperactivity, poor impulse control, and inattention. This can in turn negatively affect the day to day activities of a child such as social interactions and learning. A meta-analysis in 2015 showed that stimulant medications impair sleep of children and adolescents. Some researchers have argued that stimulant medication may improve sleep. Importantly there appears to be heterogeneity in the effects of stimulant medication on sleep with some people sleeping better and some people worse after taking Foquest®. Although the randomized controlled trials done to date have demonstrated the efficacy and outlined the safety profile of Foquest, there remains some unanswered questions about the practical implications in the real-world setting. Some clinicians have raised the concern, for example, that the extended duration of Foquest, may have a negative impact on sleep. This study will evaluate the effect of Foquest® on sleep and particularly sleep latency and self and parent reported sleep restorative quality. This would be a novel study as there is no objective or subjective data on the effect of the Foquest® on sleep latency and total sleep time in children aged 6-12.