There are about 28871 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Canada. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of lacosamide (LCM) versus an Active Comparator chosen based on standard of care (StOC) in severe and nonsevere seizure burden (defined as total minutes of electroencephalographic neonatal seizures (ENS) per hour) in neonates with seizures that are not adequately controlled with previous anti-epileptic drug (AED) treatment.
This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of an investigational study drug (called CTP-543) in adults (18 years and older) who have 50% or greater scalp hair loss.
Drug studies often look at the effect one or two drugs have on a medical condition, and involve one company. There is currently an urgent need for one study to efficiently test multiple drugs from more than one company, in people who have tested positive for COVID-19 but who do not currently need hospitalization. This could help prevent disease progression to more serious symptoms and complications, and spread of COVID-19 in the community. This study looks at the safety and effectiveness of different drugs in treating COVID-19 in outpatients. In Phase II, participants in the study will be treated with either a study drug or with placebo. In protocol version 7.0, participants in Phase III of the study will be treated with either a study drug or active comparator drug. Participants assigned to the bamlanivimab agent/placebo arm and will have 28 days of intensive follow-up following study drug administration, followed by limited follow-up through 24 weeks in phase II and in phase III. All other investigational agents and their corresponding placebo arms will involve 28 days of intensive follow-up, followed by limited follow-up through 72 weeks in phase II and phase III. Additional study visits may be required, depending on the agent.
Falls are a major health concern amongst older adults with cancer, and are often related to decreased physical strength due to effects of cancer and its treatments. Ample evidence demonstrates the benefits of exercise programs incorporating strength and balance training on lower body strength, balance, and fall prevention older adults. However, gaps in research exist within the geriatric oncology context. The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility and efficacy of a 3-month, remotely delivered exercise program regimen on lower body strength, balance, and falls in older adults with cancer. This observer-blinded, randomized controlled feasibility trial aims to recruit older cancer patients (aged ≥65). Participants in the intervention group will undertake the exercise program 3 times weekly for three months. Data collection will include sociodemographic survey, baseline, end-of-intervention (3-month) assessment, follow-up (6-month) assessment, chart review, and exit survey. Descriptive and inferential statistics will be used to analyze data, following the intention-to-treatment principle. Data generated from this research project will inform design of a subsequent, larger exercise intervention trial. This is an important step to establish the knowledge base regarding provision of exercise interventions as a fall prevention strategy to reduce falls and their negative outcomes in older patients in the community.
This is a global Phase 2a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ritlecitinib in adults aged 18 to ≤50 years of age with ≥25% scalp hair loss due to Alopecia Areata (AA).
OPIATE is a double-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing pregabalin in addition to usual care to usual care alone for reducing post-operative opioid consumption in patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either pregabalin (300 mg pre-operatively + 75 mg post-operatively twice daily until discharge or 5 days) in addition to usual care or matching placebos in addition to usual care. The aim of the trial is to show that pregabalin is superior to usual care (i.e. a superiority trial).
The COVID-19 pandemic and the accompanying lockdown measures have made mental health a pressing public health concern. Acts that focus on benefiting others-known as prosocial behaviors-offer one promising intervention that is both flexible and low cost. However, neither the range of emotional states prosocial acts impact nor the size of those effects is currently clear, both of which directly influence its attractiveness as a treatment option. Using a large online sample from Canada and the United States, the investigators will examine the effect of a three-week prosocial intervention on two indicators of emotional well-being (happiness and the belief that one's life is valuable) and mental health (anxiety and depression). Respondents will be randomly assigned to perform prosocial, self-focused, or neutral behaviors each week. Two weeks after the intervention, a final survey will assess whether the intervention has a lasting effect on mental health and emotional well-being. The results will illuminate whether prosocial interventions are a viable approach to addressing mental health needs during the current COVID-19 pandemic, as well for those who face emotional challenges during normal times.
Obesity is a growing chronic medical condition in which as of 2015, a total of 107.7 million children and 603.7 million adults were considered obese and since 1980 the prevalence of obesity has doubled in more than 70 countries. It is estimated that 70 percent of individuals who undergo a massive weight loss would develop excess skin and based on patient reported outcome measures, it has been shown that excess skin negatively impacts patients' body image, self-esteem, physical function and body contouring surgeries have been demonstrated to improve these measures. These are surgeries that correct for excess skin and its adverse consequences. The form of the surgery is case dependent and can range from removing an apron of skin to complete contouring of the abdomen with tightening of the abdominal muscle and moving the belly button. Despite previous studies indicating mobility limitation because of excess skin and improvements after abdominal body contouring surgeries with the use of subjective measures of physical function, there are no studies that directly measures physical fitness post body contouring surgeries. Therefore, the purpose of the current study is to evaluate the impact of abdominal body contouring surgeries on direct objective measures of physical function. It is hypothesized that 1) the removal of excess skin will improve direct objective measures of physical function in post massive weight loss participants 2) the removal of excess skin will improve direct measures of gait and balance in post massive weight loss participants 3) the removal of excess skin will improve patient reported outcome measures using quality of life questionnaires in post massive weight loss participants 4) the removal of excess skin will improve aerobic capacity in post massive weight loss participants 5) the removal of excess skin does not change the body composition in post massive weight loss participants.
This is a multicenter, Phase 2b, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study to provide data on efficacy, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of PF-07285557 (hereafter, vupanorsen) administered subcutaneously (SC) at various doses and regimens in participants with dyslipidemia, defined in this study as participants with elevated non-HDL-C and TG who are receiving a stable dose of a statin. This study is also known as TaRgeting ANGPTL3 with an aNtiSense oLigonucleotide in AdulTs with dyslipidEmia (TRANSLATE-TIMI 70).
This study will look at whether nabilone is an effective treatment for agitation in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. Agitation is highly prevalent in patients with AD and is one of the most distressing and challenging-to-treat symptoms. Agitation is associated with faster progression to institutionalization, increased caregiver burden, poorer quality of life, and increased risk of death. In addition, current pharmacological options show only modest efficacy and elevated risks of adverse events. Therefore, identifying safer and more effective treatments for agitation in AD is a clinical and research priority. Nabilone is a synthetic cannabinoid that is Health Canada-approved to treat chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. The PI's research group completed a 6-week double-blind placebo-controlled randomized cross-over pilot trial in 38 patients with moderate-to-severe AD, providing the first preliminary evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of nabilone in this population. They found that nabilone significantly improved agitation, overall neuropsychiatric symptoms, and caregiver distress. That study was limited by its sample size and questions remain regarding the efficacy of nabilone for nutrition and pain and predictors of response. However, the promising preliminary findings encourage a pivotal, practice-changing phase III trial to inform clinical practice. Participants in this study will be randomized to receive either nabilone or a placebo for 8 weeks. In addition to looking at the effectiveness of nabilone in treating agitation, the researchers will also look at whether it is beneficial for other relevant outcomes for patients with AD including overall neuropsychiatric symptoms, caregiver distress, cognition, nutritional status, and pain. Participants will also be followed for 8 weeks following completion of the study treatment.