Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05635994
Other study ID # 22/193-E
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date June 14, 2022
Est. completion date June 30, 2023

Study information

Verified date November 2022
Source Hospital San Carlos, Madrid
Contact Javier Escaned, MD, PhD
Phone (0034)913303000
Email escaned@secadiologia.es
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

AID-ANGIO is an observational, prospective, single arm, longitudinal study. Its objective is to investigate the diagnostic yield of the systematic use of a diagnostic strategy hierarchically addressing both obstructive and non-obstructive causes of myocardial ischaemia in an all-comers population of patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) undergoing invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Angiographically severe-grade stenosis (≥70%) can be safely considered flow-limiting without further physiological assessment. Conversely, by means of a pressure guidewire, intermediate-grade stenosis would be evaluated with fractional flow reserve (FFR) and/or non-hyperaemic pressure ratios (NHPR) in order to determine if they are physiologically relevant. Those patients with non-obstructive CAD or normal epicardial coronary arteries would undergo functional coronary tests to investigate the presence of microcirculatory and vasomotor coronary disorders, which would account for non-obstructive causes of ischaemia. The main hypothesis of AID-ANGIO study states that, in patients with CCS referred to ICA, the application of a structured strategy -including ICA, physiological assessment of intermediate-grade stenosis and functional coronary tests- leads to a high diagnostic accuracy.


Description:

AID-ANGIO is designed as an observational, prospective, single arm, longitudinal study, intended to assess the diagnostic yield of a hierarchical strategy which investigates both obstructive and non-obstructive causes of myocardial ischaemia in patients with CCS at the time of ICA. The diagnostic algorithm starts with an ICA. Angiographically severe-grade stenosis (≥70%) can be safely considered flow-limiting without further physiological assessment. Conversely, by means of a pressure guidewire, intermediate-grade stenosis should be evaluated with FFR and/or NHPR in order to determine if they are physiologically significant. Those patients with non-obstructive CAD or normal epicardial coronary arteries should undergo functional coronary tests to investigate the presence of microcirculatory and vasomotor coronary disorders, which would account for non-obstructive causes of ischaemia. The pressure guidewire to be used in the whole physiological evaluation (both epicardial and microvascular divisions) is the PressureWire X (Abbott) with a Coroventis Coroflow Cardiovascular System (Abbot) console. After obtaining patients' informed consent, enrolment would encompass two steps. Firstly, a conventional ICA would be performed, according to standard practice. Then, obtained images would be displayed to patient's referring clinicians. They would be asked to identify epicardial stenosis affecting those vessels susceptible of revascularization, if they would be ≥ or <70%, and, in those <70%, if they would think they could be physiologically relevant. They would also be asked about the tentative therapeutic approach they would suggest, only taking into account patient's clinical information and ICA images. All this information would be collected in a written document to which the interventional team would be blinded. Subsequently, AID strategy would continue to be applied as previously described. Information gathered at the end of it would be written in a separated document by the interventional team. Next, referring physician and interventional team would together review the case, considering clinical information, ICA images and all findings from AID strategy application. Suitable cases for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), would also be discussed with a cardiovascular surgeon. The AID-ANGIO study has a main hypothesis and two secondary hypotheses: - Main hypothesis: In patients with CCS referred to ICA, the application of a structured AID strategy -including ICA, physiological assessment of intermediate-grade stenosis and functional coronary tests- leads to a high diagnostic accuracy. - Secondary hypothesis (1): In patients with CCS referred to ICA, the application of a structured AID strategy leads to a significant change in their treatment. - Secondary hypothesis (2): In patients with CCS referred to ICA, the application of a structured AID strategy increases the number of patients diagnosed with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 260
Est. completion date June 30, 2023
Est. primary completion date June 20, 2023
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 90 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patients with CCS, referred to ICA by their clinicians, suffering from angina and/or positive evidence of ischaemia in non-invasive tests and/or presence of CAD in computed tomography angiography. Exclusion Criteria: - Age <18 or >90 years old. - Pregnancy. - Severe left ventricle systolic dysfunction (LVEF =30%) or congestive heart failure. - Any concomitant severe valve disease. Severely decreased renal function (glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2). - Previous CABG. - Presence of any anatomic features hampering intracoronary instrumentation with pressure guidewires. - Contraindications to the administration of adenosine (asthma, 2nd or 3rd grade atrioventricular block without pacemaker, history of a non-ablationed accessory pathway-mediated tachycardia) or acetylcholine (asthma, 2nd or 3rd grade atrioventricular block without pacemaker, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation).

Study Design


Intervention

Diagnostic Test:
AID strategy
AID strategy encompasses a hierarchical algorithm intended to investigate both obstructive and non-obstructive causes of myocardial ischaemia. AID strategy starts with an ICA. Angiographically severe-grade stenosis (=70%) can be safely considered flow-limiting without further physiological assessment. Conversely, by means of a pressure guidewire, intermediate-grade stenosis should be evaluated with FFR and/or NHPR in order to determine if they are physiologically significant. Those patients with non-obstructive CAD or normal epicardial coronary arteries should undergo functional coronary tests to investigate the presence of microcirculatory and vasomotor coronary disorders, which would account for non-obstructive causes of ischaemia.

Locations

Country Name City State
Spain Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias Alcalá De Henares Madrid
Spain Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada Fuenlabrada Madrid
Spain Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa Leganés Madrid
Spain Hospital Clinico San Carlos Madrid

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Hospital San Carlos, Madrid Fundacion Investigacion Interhospitalaria Cardiovascular

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Number of patients with a definite diagnosis of a cause of myocardial ischemia after ICA and an AID strategy. To investigate the additional diagnostic value of an AID strategy over ICA alone in an all-comer population of patients with CCS. From date of the first inclusion in the study until the date of last inclusion, assessed up to 48 months.
Secondary Number of patients in which the application of an AID strategy leads to a change from the initial treatment plan, only based in clinical information and ICA findings. To investigate the influence of a structured AID strategy on the treatment plan in patients with CCS. From date of the first inclusion in the study until the date of last inclusion, assessed up to 48 months.
Secondary Number of patients with CMD, defined as low CFR or high IMR. To study the prevalence of CMD in an all-comers population of patients with CCS referred to ICA. From date of the first inclusion in the study until the date of last inclusion, assessed up to 48 months.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06030596 - SPECT Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fraction Flow Reserve
Completed NCT04080700 - Korean Prospective Registry for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach (KODRA)
Recruiting NCT03810599 - Patient-reported Outcomes in the Bergen Early Cardiac Rehabilitation Study N/A
Recruiting NCT06002932 - Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy With DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions. N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06032572 - Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the VRS100 System in PCI (ESSENCE) N/A
Recruiting NCT04242134 - Drug-coating Balloon Angioplasties for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions N/A
Recruiting NCT05308719 - Nasal Oxygen Therapy After Cardiac Surgery N/A
Completed NCT04556994 - Phase 1 Cardiac Rehabilitation With and Without Lower Limb Paddling Effects in Post CABG Patients. N/A
Recruiting NCT05846893 - Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT06027788 - CTSN Embolic Protection Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT05023629 - STunning After Balloon Occlusion N/A
Completed NCT04941560 - Assessing the Association Between Multi-dimension Facial Characteristics and Coronary Artery Diseases
Completed NCT04006288 - Switching From DAPT to Dual Pathway Inhibition With Low-dose Rivaroxaban in Adjunct to Aspirin in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Phase 4
Completed NCT01860274 - Meshed Vein Graft Patency Trial - VEST N/A
Recruiting NCT06174090 - The Effect of Video Education on Pain, Anxiety and Knowledge Levels of Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery Patients N/A
Terminated NCT03959072 - Cardiac Cath Lab Staff Radiation Exposure
Completed NCT03968809 - Role of Cardioflux in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Outcomes
Recruiting NCT05065073 - Iso-Osmolar vs. Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography Phase 4
Recruiting NCT04566497 - Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up. N/A
Completed NCT05096442 - Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Korean Patients With Coronary De Novo Lesions N/A