Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04045873
Other study ID # KY20192060-F-1
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date December 2019
Est. completion date June 2024

Study information

Verified date July 2019
Source Xijing Hospital
Contact Yi Liu, MD, PhD
Phone 86-02984775183
Email liuyimeishan@hotmail.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

To determine whether hemodynamic support combining VA-ECMO with IABP could mitigate the rates of Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCEs), compared with IABP support alone, in patients undergoing elective and high-risk PCI.


Description:

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) supported by mechanical circulatory device may be a viable alternative for these patients with complex coronary artery disease combined with multiple comorbidities and poor hemodynamics. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) can direct blood flow out of the body, oxygenate it, and then return it, to either completely or partially replace the function of the heart and lungs, and potentially increase the likelihood of functional recovery. Limitations of ECMO include lack of direct LV unloading, and increased LV afterload with subsequent LV overload, which in turn can increase myocardial oxygen demand and therefore limit any cardioprotective benefits . Measures to concurrently decrease LV afterload during ECMO, such as use of an Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP), may in theory offset some of the disadvantages of ECMO. To date, ECMO has most commonly been used in patients suffering from cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock . As far as we are aware, there exist very limited reported data from monocentric observational studies and individual case reports on the use of ECMO for elective, high-risk PCI in the literature . More importantly, no previous randomized studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a strategy combining VA-ECMO and IABP during high-risk PCI have been conducted to date. Most importantly, the strategy of combined VA-ECMO and IABP has never been investigated in any randomized trial that we could find.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 306
Est. completion date June 2024
Est. primary completion date July 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 85 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients aged from 18 years to 85 years who meet any one of the following criteria

1. Unprotected left main coronary artery disease with severe LV dysfunction (EF<35% or NYHA grade ? and ?).

2. Unprotected left main coronary artery disease without severe LV dysfunction (LVEF>35% or NYHA ? and ?) must meet at least two of the complex procedure criteria (see Section II below).

3. 3-vessel disease with severe LV dysfunction (EF<35% or NYHA grade ? and ?) must meet at least two of the complex procedure criteria (see Section II below).

Criteria Defining a Complex Procedure

1. Bifurcation requiring PCI in two branches (including PTCA or stenting).

2. Calcification requiring atherectomy.

3. Tortuosity requiring device assistance.

4. Difficult CTO(J-CTO score=2).

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Acute myocardial infarction within the previous 48 hours.

2. Pre-procedure cardiac arrest within 24 hours of enrollment requiring CPR.

3. Cardiogenic shock.

4. Complications of acute myocardial infarction (including ventricular septal defect, severe mitral regurgitation, and intractable ventricular arrhythmias).

5. Contraindications to IABP or ECMO use, including significant iliac or femoral arterial disease and more than mild aortic regurgitation as seen on echocardiography.

6. Bleeding diathesis or warfarin therapy with an international normalized ratio greater than 2.5.

7. Active internal bleeding (including menstruation) within the past month.

8. Recent ischemic stroke within the past month diagnosed by CT or MRI.

9. Previous hemorrhagic stroke diagnosed by CT or MRI.

10. Allergy to aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin, ticagrelor or glycoprotein IIb/ IIIa inhibitors; thrombocytopenia.

11. Pregnancy.

12. Current enrollment in any other study.

Study Design


Intervention

Device:
extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
The VA-ECMO procedure will be performed by femoral artery access, and the IABP will then be implanted in the contralateral femoral artery.

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (6)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Xijing Hospital Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Bethune International Peace Hospital, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary The primary efficacy end point is the composite rate of MACCE at peri-procedure, in-hospital, or within a 30-day follow-up post-discharge. The composite primary end point components include angiographic failure rates of PCI, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke or transient ischemic attack, any repeat revascularization procedure, acute renal insufficiency, major vascular complications, severe intraprocedural hypotension requiring therapy, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or ventricular tachycardia requiring cardioversion. 30 days
Secondary The rate of complete revascularization intra-procedure
Secondary intra-procedure hemodynamics intra-procedure
Secondary vascular access site and access-related complications intra-procedure
Secondary major or life-threatening or disabling bleeding 30 days
Secondary stroke or transient ischemic attack 30 days
Secondary acute kidney injury 30 days
Secondary MACCE at 6 months 6 months
Secondary MACCE at 1 year 1 year
Secondary MACCE at 2 years 2 years
Secondary MACCE at 3 years 3 years
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06030596 - SPECT Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fraction Flow Reserve
Completed NCT04080700 - Korean Prospective Registry for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach (KODRA)
Recruiting NCT03810599 - Patient-reported Outcomes in the Bergen Early Cardiac Rehabilitation Study N/A
Recruiting NCT06002932 - Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy With DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions. N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06032572 - Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the VRS100 System in PCI (ESSENCE) N/A
Recruiting NCT04242134 - Drug-coating Balloon Angioplasties for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions N/A
Recruiting NCT05308719 - Nasal Oxygen Therapy After Cardiac Surgery N/A
Completed NCT04556994 - Phase 1 Cardiac Rehabilitation With and Without Lower Limb Paddling Effects in Post CABG Patients. N/A
Recruiting NCT05846893 - Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT06027788 - CTSN Embolic Protection Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT05023629 - STunning After Balloon Occlusion N/A
Completed NCT04941560 - Assessing the Association Between Multi-dimension Facial Characteristics and Coronary Artery Diseases
Completed NCT04006288 - Switching From DAPT to Dual Pathway Inhibition With Low-dose Rivaroxaban in Adjunct to Aspirin in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Phase 4
Completed NCT01860274 - Meshed Vein Graft Patency Trial - VEST N/A
Recruiting NCT06174090 - The Effect of Video Education on Pain, Anxiety and Knowledge Levels of Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery Patients N/A
Completed NCT03968809 - Role of Cardioflux in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Outcomes
Terminated NCT03959072 - Cardiac Cath Lab Staff Radiation Exposure
Recruiting NCT05065073 - Iso-Osmolar vs. Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography Phase 4
Recruiting NCT04566497 - Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up. N/A
Completed NCT05096442 - Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Korean Patients With Coronary De Novo Lesions N/A