Left Internal Thoracic Artery Bypass Versus Percutaneous Revascularization in Diabetics

Coronary Artery Disease Clinical Trial

— LIBERTI  

Official title:

Left Internal Thoracic Artery Bypass Versus Percutaneous Revascularization in Diabetics:Is Minimally Invasive Left Internal Thoracic Artery Bypass Superior to Percutaneous Revascularization in Diabetic Patients With Isolated LAD Stenosis?

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Withdrawn

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02355288
• Other study ID #: 20130910
• Status: Withdrawn
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: October 1, 2018
• Est. completion date: October 1, 2020

Study information

• Verified date: April 2018
• Source: Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether less invasive bypass surgery using the left chest wall artery is more or less effective than inserting a heart stent in patients with diabetes and a blockage of the main artery at the front of the heart. This will be a clinical trial study where the investigators will test the rate of recruitment into the study, as well as the feasibility of allocating each of the 2 treatments.

Description:

Purpose/Objectives:

The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate whether minimally invasive bypass surgery with the left internal thoracic artery (MICS CABG) is more or less effective than percutaneous revascularization with drug eluting stents (PCI/DES) in patients with diabetes and stenosis of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery.

Population:

The investigators will recruit 100 adults with diabetes mellitus (Type 1 or Type 2) and angiographically-confirmed proximal or mid LAD disease, morphologically amenable to either MICS CABG or PCI/DES; outside the context of an acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and with indication for revascularization based upon symptoms of worsening angina and/or objective evidence of myocardial ischemia.

Design:

This trial is a multicentre, two-arm, open label, prospective, randomized, pilot trial over a duration of 2.75 years, with 0.75 year of initiation, 1 year of patient recruitment and 2 years of follow-up. Patients who consent will be randomized on a 1:1 basis either to MICS CABG or PCI/DES of the LAD, and followed at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, and 2 years.

Treatment:

Eligible patients will be randomized to receive either MICS CABG or PCI/DES to the LAD. Patients randomized to the PCI/DES arm will receive, at the discretion of the primary physician or interventionalist, the stent of choice at the treating institution, with a recommendation of a everolimus- or zotarolimus-eluting stent.

Primary Endpoint:

The primary endpoint is successfully enrolled, eligible and consenting patients within the first year of enrollment, with success defined as 100 patients or more.

Secondary Endpoints:

All-cause mortality, Myocardial Infarction (MI), stroke and target vessel revascularization (TVR) will be compared for the therapy comparison PCI/DES versus MICS CABG. For these analyses, the survival analysis outlined for the primary analysis will be followed.

Quality of Life (QOL) at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, and 2 year will be compared for the therapy comparison PCI/DES vs. MICS CABG. Patients will be asked to complete the following questionnaires: the EuroQOL (EQ-5D) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ).

Statistics:

The main feasibility questions are: "can the investigators enroll a sizable number of patients at a given centre over a 1 year period?", "can the investigators implement and conduct the proposed trial across multiple centres?", and "can the investigators ensure high protocol adherence and follow-up, as well as minimize crossovers?". By enrolling 100 participants across 5 sites over 1 year, and follow them.

For each therapy group, the frequency distribution each of the domains of the EQ5D will be tabulated and the mean, standard deviation, median and interquartile range (IQR) calculated. Therapy groups will be compared on these outcomes using the t-test or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and 95%CI calculated. Repeated measures ANOVA will compare the two therapy groups on changes in health related QOL over time

Participating Centres:

The investigators have chosen 5 study sites in Canada (3) and in the United States (2). The recruitment goal for each site is to enroll at least 20 patients.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Withdrawn
• Enrollment: 0
• Est. completion date: October 1, 2020
• Est. primary completion date: October 1, 2020
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Male or Female age 18 years or older

• Diabetes Mellitus (Type 1 or Type 2) undergoing treatment

• Angiographically confirmed stenosis (= 70%) lesion of the proximal LAD (segment 6) or mid LAD (segment 7), with no culprit lesion or stenosis of more than 60% (in a vessel of 1.5 mm or more) in the LCX and RCA territories, and no stenosis equal or more than 50% in the left main artery. Diagonal disease does not constitute an exclusion

• Angiographic characteristics amenable to both PCI/DES and MICS CABG

• Indication for revascularization based upon symptoms of angina and/or objective evidence of myocardial ischemia

• Willing to comply with all follow-up required study visits

• Signed and received copy of informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

• Severe congestive heart failure (class III or IV according to NYHA, or pulmonary edema) at the time of enrollment.

• Left ventricular ejection fraction less than 20%;

• Prior CABG surgery.

• Prior Valve surgery.

• Prior PCI with stent implantation within 6 months.

• Previous tuberculosis or trauma to the chest that may have cause adhesions or LITA damage.

• Previous stroke within 6 months or patients with stroke at more than 6 months with significant residual neurologic involvement, as reflected in a Rankin Score > 1.

• Prior history of significant bleeding (within the previous 6 months) that might be expected to occur during CABG or PCI/DES related anticoagulation.

• In-stent restenosis in the LAD.

• Left main stenosis (50% or more).

• STEMI or Q-wave MI within 72 hours prior to enrollment

• Planned simultaneous surgical procedure unrelated to coronary revascularization (e.g. valve repair/replacement, aneurysmectomy, carotid endarterectomy or carotid stent).

• Contraindication to either CABG or PCI/DES because of a coexisting clinical condition.

• Significant leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, or known bleeding diathesis.

• Intolerance or contraindication to aspirin or both clopidogrel and ticagrelor.

• Dementia with a Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) score of <20.

• Extra-cardiac illness that is expected to limit survival to less than 5 years.

• Suspected pregnancy. A pregnancy test (urine or serum) will be administered pre-randomization to all women not clearly menopausal.

• Concurrent enrollment in another clinical trial.

• Geographically inaccessible for follow-up visits required by protocol.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Coronary Artery Disease
• Coronary Disease
• Diabetes Mellitus
• Myocardial Ischemia

Intervention

Procedure:
• Minimally Invasive Coronary Bypass
Bypass graft of the Left Anterior Descending (LAD) artery using minimally invasive cardiac surgery. MICS is a bypass surgery done with a small (4-6 cm) incision under the left breast, instead of the usual incision down the middle the chest.
• Percutenous Coronary Intervention
Stenting of the Left Anterior Descending (LAD) artery using a drug-eluting stent.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation	University of Toronto

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Successfully enrolled, eligible and consenting patients within the first year of enrollment.	To determine the feasibility of the study by successfully recruiting 100 patients within the 1 year recruitment period.	1 year
Secondary	All-cause Mortality	All-cause mortality will be compared for the therapy comparison PCI/DES versus MICS CABG. For these analyses, the survival analysis outlined for the primary analysis will be followed.	2 years
Secondary	Myocardial Infarction (MI)	MI will be compared for the therapy comparison PCI/DES versus MICS CABG. For these analyses, the survival analysis outlined for the primary analysis will be followed.	2 years
Secondary	Stroke	Stroke will be compared for the therapy comparison PCI/DES versus MICS CABG. For these analyses, the survival analysis outlined for the primary analysis will be followed.	2 years
Secondary	Target Vessel Revasularization (TVR)	TVR will be compared for the therapy comparison PCI/DES versus MICS CABG. For these analyses, the survival analysis outlined for the primary analysis will be followed.	2 years
Secondary	Quality of Life (QOL)	QOL at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, and 2 year will be compared for the therapy comparison PCI/DES vs. MICS CABG. Patients will undergo the following QOL questionnaires at each time point above: The EuroQOL (EQ-5D), Seattle Angina Questionnaire, (SAQ).	2 years