Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02061891
Other study ID # H-4-2010-039
Secondary ID EDITORS
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date November 2010
Est. completion date May 2030

Study information

Verified date December 2022
Source Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate if acute invasive coronary evaluation and treatment conducted within 12 hours of diagnosis improves clinical outcome compared to a deferred, subacute strategy in patients with unstable angina pectoris (UAP) / non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) Furthermore, in an observational design the potential clinical benefit of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to select patients for invasive investigation and treatment in the two treatment arms (acute vs deferred) is evaluated. The following main hypothesis will be tested: - Very early invasive coronary investigation improves clinical outcome in patients with UAP/NSTEMI-ACS - CCTA performed before invasive coronary investigation will improve clinical management of patients with UAP/NSTEMI-ACS


Description:

MATERIAL Consecutive patients suspected of UAP/NSTEMI will be screened for participation in the study. Only patients deemed clinically suited for invasive coronary evaluation and treatment will be included. A total of 2500 patients will be included in the trial at Departments of Cardiology of Danish Hospitals. METHODS If the patients accept participation in the trial a computerized 1:1 randomization for acute invasive coronary evaluation (Intervention group - within 12 hours from time of diagnosis) or for deferred invasive evaluation (Control group - no later than 72 hours from time of diagnosis). All included patients undergo CCTA prior to invasive coronary evaluation, except for patient with moderately reduced renal function (se below). The treating invasive cardiologist will remain blinded to observational CCTA data. Patients with endstage renal disease in dialysis may undergo CCTA. CCTA data recorded as part of the research protocol will not be made available for the treating physician. SECONDARY EXCLUSION Based on post-hoc expert clinical evaluation patients not having UAP/NSTEMI-ACS (arrythmias, pulmonary oedema, missed STEMI, pneumonia, Pulmonary emboli) will be excluded from analysis of difference between outcome measures in treatment strategy groups. STATISTICAL METHODS Patients with UAP/NSTEMI-ACS are based on previous studies expected to have an event rate of 15% within 1 year and 50% at 4 years of the primary combined endpoint: all cause mortality, non-fatal recurrent myocardial infarction, hospitalisation for refractory ischemia or heart failure. In order to demonstrate a reduction of 25% within 3 years 711 patients in each group are needed. The study is powered to detect a clinical relevant reduction in mortality or heart failure hospitalization with a total of 2500 patients.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 2500
Est. completion date May 2030
Est. primary completion date June 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: Patients with clinical suspicion of of UAP/NSTEMI acute coronary syndrome deemed suitable for invasive evaluation and treatment will be included in the study. - Age> 18 years - At least one of the following: - ECG abnormalities suggestive of myocardial ischemia (newly developed ST segment depression, horizontal or descending >= 0,05mV in two anatomically adjacent leads and/or T-wave inversion >0,01 mV in two leads with prominent R wave or R/S ratio >1 - Elevated myocardial ischemia biomarkers (Troponin, CK-MB) Exclusion Criteria: - Pregnancy - Circumstances preventing the patient from reading and/or understanding the research protocol information - Clinical indication for acute invasive coronary angiography - severe chest pain despite intravenous nitroglycerin infusion or hemodynamic instability - Expected survival of less than 1 year - Known allergy/hypersensitivity of pharmacological platelet inhibitors and/or iodine contrast that cannot be prevented medically Patients with known eGFR below 60 ml/min will not undergo CCTA, whereas patients in dialysis will undergo the entire study protocol

Study Design


Intervention

Procedure:
Invasive coronary evaluation (Deferred)
Invasive coronary angiography and revascularization (PCI/CABG)
Invasive coronary evaluation (Acute)
Invasive coronary angiography and revascularization (PCI/CABG)

Locations

Country Name City State
Denmark Department of Cardiology and Radiology, Rigshospitalet, The Heart Center, Capital Region of Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Rigshospitalet, Denmark University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Denmark, 

References & Publications (3)

Kristensen TS, Kofoed KF, Kuhl JT, Nielsen WB, Nielsen MB, Kelbaek H. Prognostic implications of nonobstructive coronary plaques in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multidetector computed tomography study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jul 26;58(5):502-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.01.058. — View Citation

Mehta SR, Granger CB, Boden WE, Steg PG, Bassand JP, Faxon DP, Afzal R, Chrolavicius S, Jolly SS, Widimsky P, Avezum A, Rupprecht HJ, Zhu J, Col J, Natarajan MK, Horsman C, Fox KA, Yusuf S; TIMACS Investigators. Early versus delayed invasive intervention in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009 May 21;360(21):2165-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807986. — View Citation

Navarese EP, Gurbel PA, Andreotti F, Tantry U, Jeong YH, Kozinski M, Engstrom T, Di Pasquale G, Kochman W, Ardissino D, Kedhi E, Stone GW, Kubica J. Optimal timing of coronary invasive strategy in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 19;158(4):261-70. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00006. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other CCTA diagnostic accuracy Determinants of diagnostic accuracy of CCTA for the identification of >50% and >70% coronary artery stenosis by invasive coronary angiography in both treatment strategy groups Within 30 days after performed CCTA and ICA
Other CCTA guided treatment strategy Prediction of clinical treatment strategy based on CCTA - and the potential value of CCTA guided triage in terms of optimized patient management. Evaluation will be performed blinded to ICA findings. Within 30 days after performed CCTA and ICA
Other CCTA prediction of clinical outcome Clinical prognostic value of coronary pathology, cardiac and non-cardiac pathology identified by CCTA 3 and 5 years
Primary Composite clinical endpoint Composite endpoint of all cause mortality, non-fatal recurrent acute myocardial infarction, hospitalisation for refractory ischemia (acute coronary syndrome) or heart failure 3 years
Secondary Bleeding Major and minor bleeding according to TIMI and BARC classification systems During index hospitalization - an expected average of 5 days
Secondary Non-bleeding, invasive procedure related complications Invasive procedure related acute myocardial infarction, embolic stroke, cardiac arrest During index hospitalization - an expected average of 5 days
Secondary Death All-cause death 3 and 5 years
Secondary Non-fatal acute myocardial infarction 3 and 5 years
Secondary Hospital admittance due to refractory myocardial ischemia (acute coronary syndrome) 3 and 5 years
Secondary Repeat coronary revascularization Recorded from 30 days post-index procedure 3 and 5 years
Secondary Hospital admittance due to left ventricular heart failure 3 and 5 years
Secondary GRACE Risk Score All primary and secondary endpoints stratified by GRACE score at a threshold of 140 3 and 5 years
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06030596 - SPECT Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fraction Flow Reserve
Completed NCT04080700 - Korean Prospective Registry for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach (KODRA)
Recruiting NCT03810599 - Patient-reported Outcomes in the Bergen Early Cardiac Rehabilitation Study N/A
Recruiting NCT06002932 - Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy With DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions. N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06032572 - Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the VRS100 System in PCI (ESSENCE) N/A
Recruiting NCT05308719 - Nasal Oxygen Therapy After Cardiac Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT04242134 - Drug-coating Balloon Angioplasties for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions N/A
Completed NCT04556994 - Phase 1 Cardiac Rehabilitation With and Without Lower Limb Paddling Effects in Post CABG Patients. N/A
Recruiting NCT05846893 - Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT06027788 - CTSN Embolic Protection Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT05023629 - STunning After Balloon Occlusion N/A
Completed NCT04941560 - Assessing the Association Between Multi-dimension Facial Characteristics and Coronary Artery Diseases
Completed NCT04006288 - Switching From DAPT to Dual Pathway Inhibition With Low-dose Rivaroxaban in Adjunct to Aspirin in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Phase 4
Completed NCT01860274 - Meshed Vein Graft Patency Trial - VEST N/A
Recruiting NCT06174090 - The Effect of Video Education on Pain, Anxiety and Knowledge Levels of Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery Patients N/A
Completed NCT03968809 - Role of Cardioflux in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Outcomes
Terminated NCT03959072 - Cardiac Cath Lab Staff Radiation Exposure
Recruiting NCT05065073 - Iso-Osmolar vs. Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography Phase 4
Recruiting NCT04566497 - Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up. N/A
Completed NCT05096442 - Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Korean Patients With Coronary De Novo Lesions N/A