Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03393871
Other study ID # MyoMass
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date February 1, 2018
Est. completion date March 1, 2019

Study information

Verified date February 2018
Source Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The background for performing the present study is to compare the mass calculations by CT scanning and by invasive absolute blood flow measurements and thereby corroborating both methods.


Description:

Although knowledge about the myocardial mass (in grams) of the different territories belonging to the major coronary arteries, is of clinical importance to estimate risk of coronary interventions (PCI, CABG) and to determine area of necrosis after myocardial infarction, no invasive methodology has been available so far for reliable assessment of mass.

Especially in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), it would be valuable to have information about the absolute and relative myocardial mass distal to the location where the intervention is planned. Such information is valuable for risk estimation and can also be helpful in multivessel disease to determine the most adequate way of revascularization.

Both MRI and CT scanning have claimed to be able to estimate myocardial mass non-invasively, but by the lack of any gold standard, none of these methods could be validated in vivo so far.

A relatively new development in CT technology is the calculation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) by CT scanning, according to a sophisticated algorithm developed by Heartflow Inc. One of the baseline assumptions in that algorithm is that myocardial mass is proportional to resting blood flow, which seems a plausible assumption from a rational physiological point of view.

More recently, invasive calculation of absolute blood flow has become possible as well as resistance measurement of the (microcirculation of the) myocardium.

Using that invasive technology (explained in the appendix to this protocol), it can be assumed that measuring absolute maximum blood flow in a coronary artery as well as fractional flow reserve for different territories or for different spots within one major coronary artery, provides a basis for relative mass calculation. The background for performing the present study is to compare these mass calculations by CT scanning and by invasive measurements, thereby corroborating both methods.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 60
Est. completion date March 1, 2019
Est. primary completion date December 1, 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 75 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Presence of multivessel coronary disease with an indication for multivessel FFR and/or PCI or patients with single vessel disease scheduled for FFR/PCI of that single coronary artery

- Availability of a coronary CT scan performed prior to the scheduled invasive investigation. The time difference between the CT scan and the invasive exam should be less than 3 months.

- Focal lesions only

- Normal left ventricular function

- Age < 75 years

- Note: previous uncomplicated PCI in any of the coronary arteries is permitted

Exclusion Criteria:

- Inability to give informed consent

- Diffuse coronary disease

- Tortuous or calcified arteries interfering with reliable invasive FFR assessment

- Previous myocardial infarction or ejection fraction less than 60% by echocardiography or ventriculography or less than 50% by nuclear methods

- Atrial fibrillation interfering with high quality coronary CT scanning

- Contra-indications for CT scanning

- Left main stenosis

- Age > 75 years

- Pregnancy or desired pregnancy in the future

Study Design


Intervention

Diagnostic Test:
absolute blood flow measurement
Absolute maximum flow will be measured, using the RayFlow® multifunctional monorail infusion catheter. (This measurement takes a few minutes per artery, does not require any additional drug, but only 50-100 ml of saline per artery, and is not associated with any additional risk for the patient compared to the regular invasive procedure.

Locations

Country Name City State
Netherlands Catharina Hospital Eindhoven Brabant

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Netherlands, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Comparison of Mass and flow To compare relative myocardial mass distribution (i.e. mass of the respective territories of LAD, LCX and RCA) by CT scanning to normalized hyperemic blood flow in the three major myocardial territories as assessed by absolute flow measurements and FFR in patients with an indication for multivessel FFR measurement. 3 months
Primary Comparison of Mass and flow in the LAD To compare relative myocardial mass belonging to a proximal or a mid segment of one of the major coronary arteries measured by CT scanning to invasive absolute flow and FFR measurement in that particular proximal or mid coronary artery in patients undergoing single or multivessel PCI. 3 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06030596 - SPECT Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fraction Flow Reserve
Completed NCT04080700 - Korean Prospective Registry for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach (KODRA)
Recruiting NCT03810599 - Patient-reported Outcomes in the Bergen Early Cardiac Rehabilitation Study N/A
Recruiting NCT06002932 - Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy With DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions. N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06032572 - Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the VRS100 System in PCI (ESSENCE) N/A
Recruiting NCT04242134 - Drug-coating Balloon Angioplasties for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions N/A
Recruiting NCT05308719 - Nasal Oxygen Therapy After Cardiac Surgery N/A
Completed NCT04556994 - Phase 1 Cardiac Rehabilitation With and Without Lower Limb Paddling Effects in Post CABG Patients. N/A
Recruiting NCT05846893 - Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT06027788 - CTSN Embolic Protection Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT05023629 - STunning After Balloon Occlusion N/A
Completed NCT04941560 - Assessing the Association Between Multi-dimension Facial Characteristics and Coronary Artery Diseases
Completed NCT04006288 - Switching From DAPT to Dual Pathway Inhibition With Low-dose Rivaroxaban in Adjunct to Aspirin in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Phase 4
Completed NCT01860274 - Meshed Vein Graft Patency Trial - VEST N/A
Recruiting NCT06174090 - The Effect of Video Education on Pain, Anxiety and Knowledge Levels of Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery Patients N/A
Completed NCT03968809 - Role of Cardioflux in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Outcomes
Terminated NCT03959072 - Cardiac Cath Lab Staff Radiation Exposure
Recruiting NCT05065073 - Iso-Osmolar vs. Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography Phase 4
Recruiting NCT04566497 - Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up. N/A
Completed NCT05096442 - Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Coronary De Novo Lesions N/A