Clinical Trials Logo

Colorectal Cancer clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Colorectal Cancer.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT03957096 Terminated - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

A Safety Study of SGN-CD47M in Patients With Solid Tumors

Start date: July 17, 2019
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

This trial will study SGN-CD47M to find out whether it is an effective treatment for different types of solid tumors and what side effects (unwanted effects) may occur. The study will have two parts. Part A of the study will find out how much SGN-CD47M should be given for treatment and how often. Part B of the study will use the dose found in Part A and look at how safe and effective the treatment is.

NCT ID: NCT03875313 Terminated - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

Study of CB-839 (Telaglenastat) in Combination With Talazoparib in Patients With Solid Tumors

Start date: May 20, 2019
Phase: Phase 1/Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This is a Phase 1b/2 study to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and clinical activity of the glutaminase inhibitor CB-839 with the poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor talazoparib in participants with advanced/metastatic solid tumors.

NCT ID: NCT03856255 Terminated - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

Polyp Measurement Device

Start date: June 24, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Colorectal cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Colorectal cancer screening is recommended to begin at age 50 years for most men and women at average risk for this disease. Colonoscopy is a gold standard method of screening for colorectal cancer, allowing for the detection and removal of colorectal polyps, some of which can progress into malignancy. The literature has shown that the removal of polyps during a colonoscopy results in decreased incidence and mortality related to colorectal cancer. Indeed, the last decade has shown a decline in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in adults over age 50, largely due to increased colonoscopy screening. Currently, the risk of a patient developing colorectal cancer and thus time intervals for colonoscopy surveillance post-polypectomy is determined by the number, pathology, and size of the polyps that are observed and removed during the colonoscopy procedure. Current surveillance guidelines indicate the need for a shorter interval before the next colonoscopy for patients who have one or more polyps that are 10mm or larger. In addition, different polypectomy techniques are indicated for the treatment of polyps less than 20mm in size. For example, cold forceps may be appropriate for removal of 1mm to 2mm polyps, cold snare for polyps less than 10mm, and hot-snare resection for polyps 10mm to 19mm. Yet, while the number and pathology of polyps are easily obtained and verified, it is standard practice for the size of a polyp to be assessed through endoscopist optical visualization alone, without use of an objective device or standard by which to measure it. Often, the endoscopist will compare the size of the polyp to the size of the snare loop to estimate and document the size of the polyp(s). However, with the size of a polyp being a major indicator of malignant potential as well as an indicator of appropriate polypectomy technique and surveillance intervals, a device with which to take and document accurate and objective measurements of polyps during colonoscopy holds the potential for health benefits. In addition to having a potential clinical benefit for each patient in terms of polypectomy and surveillance intervals, as an objective indicator of polyp size, this technique also holds promise for use in future studies that evaluate polyp size as an indicator of potential malignancy (or future malignancy) and for use by national clinical guidelines committees who may utilize these objective data to update future screening and surveillance recommendations.

NCT ID: NCT03806244 Terminated - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

Feasibility of Stereotactic Navigation in Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

PELVINAV
Start date: July 17, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

To evaluate the feasibility and precision of stereotaxic navigation in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

NCT ID: NCT03730948 Terminated - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

DC Vaccine in Colorectal Cancer

Start date: March 12, 2019
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

This is a pilot study to assess the safety and tolerability, as well as the immune response rate, of mDC3 vaccine in patients with colorectal cancer.

NCT ID: NCT03724253 Terminated - Breast Cancer Clinical Trials

[68Ga]-NeoBOMB1 Imaging in Patients With Malignancies Known to Overexpress Gastrin Releasing Peptide Receptor (GRPR)

NeoFIND
Start date: July 3, 2018
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This was a Phase II, multi-center, open label, single dose study in patients with tumor types known to overexpress Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor (GRPR), including breast, prostate, colorectal, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Small-Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC).

NCT ID: NCT03705013 Terminated - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

Observational Study of Sub-populations From Cologuard Post-Approval Study (2014-01)

Start date: October 30, 2018
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The primary endpoint is to obtain longitudinal information on four sub-populations from the Cologuard Post-Approval Study.

NCT ID: NCT03654729 Terminated - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

Preventive Treatment of Oxaliplatin Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (POLAR-M)

POLAR-M
Start date: November 7, 2018
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

This study evaluates the investigational drug PledOx in the prevention of chronic chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) induced by the drug oxaliplatin.

NCT ID: NCT03652298 Terminated - Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials

Effects of a Neuroscience-based Technique on Cancer Patients Announced of a Palliative Disease Progression and Partners

NeuroPrevPTSD
Start date: July 25, 2018
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The diagnosis and treatment trajectory of cancer can constitute a traumatic event because these can be perceived as sudden, catastrophic and life threatening. One common mental disorder following traumatic events is post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), described as reexperiencing of the event (e.g., having intrusive thoughts), having avoidance of trauma memories, emotional numbing, and experiencing hyperarousal symptoms. To date, and to the best of the investigator's knowledge, few studies have focused on PTSD in advanced cancer, but the existing data show that these patients are at risk for experiencing PTSD symptoms. Among the early interventions for preventing PTSD in people confronted by traumatic events is group debriefing, the retelling of the event, receiving empathy and compassion, and being encouraged to express feelings. However, four meta-analyses found debriefing to be ineffective. A neuroscience-based and evidence-based alternative may be the Memory Structuring Intervention (MSI) that tries to shift trauma processing from a limbic, emotional and somatic level to a frontal-cortical, cognitive and verbal level of processing. The MSI tries to achieve this shift by teaching people confronted with traumatic events to chronologically organize the segments of the event, to verbally label feelings or somatic sensations rather than re-experience them, and to provide causal links between the event's segments and causality to their feelings and sensations Since in males, sympathetic responses were more predictive of PTSD than in females , parasympathetic activation may be needed to be added to the MSI, for men. A main branch of the parasympathetic response is the vagus nerve, whose non-invasive index is Heart Rate Variability (HRV). One way to increase HRV, and thus parasympathetic activation, is through vagal breathing (i.e., deep, paced breathing). Therefore, adding to the MSI deep vagal breathing (VB) to reduce sympathetic hyperactivity, may increase connectivity between the amygdala and the frontal cortex. This may also increase the emotional regulation possibly yielded by the MSI, however in both genders. The effects of the MSI + vagal breathing on PTSD symptoms and on prognosis in advanced cancer patients receiving announcement of terminal cancer have never been investigated. Furthermore, whether reduced inflammation and increased emotional regulation may account for such effects needs to be investigated at the fundamental level. This project reflects the merging of neuroscience, psychooncology and psychoneuroimmunology for better understanding and treating cancer patients, as well as their partners.

NCT ID: NCT03576131 Terminated - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

GEN1029 (HexaBody®-DR5/DR5) Safety Trial in Patients With Malignant Solid Tumors

Start date: April 30, 2018
Phase: Phase 1/Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of the trial is to evaluate the safety of GEN1029 (HexaBody®-DR5/DR5) in a mixed population of patients with specified solid tumors