View clinical trials related to Colorectal Cancer.
Filter by:Conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for colorectal cancer has been demonstrated to be safe and feasible and present minimally invasive benefits including faster recovery, reduced postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay, also acquiring comparable oncologic outcomes with open surgery. To achieve further minimally invasive outcomes, SILS plus one port surgery was attempted by some surgeons. Preliminary results showed that SILS+1 could achieve better minimally invasive benefits than CLS while preserving oncologic feasibility. Till now, ERAS has been practiced in colorectal cancer surgery for approximately 20 years. Studies have proven that ERAS is safe and significantly improved the recovery course of patients during perioperative period, meanwhile, the expense could be greatly reduced. Based on ERAS studies protocols and SILS+1 trials, investigators tried to combine SILS+1 with ERAS, hopefully to provide patients with more safe, economic, feasible and rapid surgery and perioperative strategies.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SCT-I10A combined SCT200 or SCT-I10A combined SCT200 plus chemotherapy in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and colorectal cancer
Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancer in Hong Kong. In 2018, CRC accounted for 17.4%, 5,780 cases, of the total new cancers. CRC claimed 2,279 lives (15.8%) making it the second most deadly killer in the population. Since 2010, the Cancer Expert Working Group (CEWG) has recommended that asymptomatic average-risk individuals aged 50 to 75 years should consider one of the screening methods: fecal occult blood test (FOBT) every one to two years; OR flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years; OR colonoscopy every 10 years. However, it poses great challenges for large scale CRC screening using colonoscopy, such as bowel preparation difficulties, complications of procedure and poor compliance. ColoClear® is intended for use as an adjunctive screening test for the detection of colorectal neoplasia associated DNA markers and for the presence of occult hemoglobin in human stool. It has the potential of increasing the sensitivity of detecting CRC as compared to FOBT or faecal immunochemical test (FIT), which detects the presence of hemoglobin in stool alone. A positive result may indicate the presence of colorectal cancer or pre-malignant colorectal neoplasia. ColoClear® is not intended as a replacement for diagnostic colonoscopy. A positive result in ColoClear®, as with any screening test, should be followed by colonoscopy. ColoClear® is intended for colorectal cancer screening in average risk individuals: adults of either sex, 40 years or older, who are at high risk for colorectal cancer.
The MA-PPING is a multicenter prospective observational study that includes patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. The study aims to map the oral and gut microbiome of patients diagnosed with pancreatic, esophageal or colorectal cancer during their surgical patient journey from the moment of diagnosis until full recovery (three months after surgery).
This study aims to develop a smartphone-based psychosocial intervention for patients with colorectal cancer and their family caregivers and to improve patients' confidence in self-care, psychological well-being, social support, quality of life, and satisfaction with care, as well as caregivers' burden, psychological well-being, and quality of life. The study also aims to explore patients' and their caregivers' perceptions of the intervention and routine care. A multi-centre two-arm experimental study design is used in this study. A total of 100 patient-caregiver dyads will be recruited and randomly allocated to either the control group (receiving routine care alone) or the intervention group (receiving routine care plus the psychosocial intervention). After completed the study, 15 patient-caregiver dyads will be invited for interviews to explore their perceptions on the intervention and/or routine care. This study will generate evidence on the effectiveness of the easily accessible and sustainable smartphone-based psychosocial intervention.
This clinical trial is an open-label, single-centre, dose escalation, phase I study designed to investigate the safety and tolerability of Haploidentical / Allogeneic NKG2DL-targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor-grafted Gamma Delta (γδ) T Cells (CTM-N2D) in Subjects with Relapsed or Refractory Solid Tumour. The study objectives of this phase I study are to determine the safety, activity and the safe dose of haploidentical or allogeneic NKG2DL-targeting chimeric antigen receptor-grafted γδ T cells given four times weekly in patients with relapsed or refractory solid tumors of different types.
One of the major barriers to CRC screening participation is a negative perception of colonoscopy as a painful and unpleasant procedure. Previously, by monitoring patient-reported outcomes as one of the colonoscopy quality performance measures, the investigators identified the endoscopist as the single, most important risk factor for painful colonoscopy. Therefore, the investigators propose a randomized controlled trial to analyse the effectiveness of directed training on the endoscopists painful colonoscopy rate. The study will be conducted in two phases: endoscopist categorization and design of training (I) and randomized controlled trial evaluating training effectiveness (II). Phase I will include endoscopists from Polish Colonoscopy Screening Programme (PCSP) willing to participate. Volunteers will be divided into underperformers, average performers and overperformers, based on their painful colonoscopy rate (obtained from PCSP database records) and will be invited to take part in the initial workshop focused on pain reduction during colonoscopy (conducted in a similar fashion to Train Colonoscopy Leaders (TCL) workshop, aiming at ADR improvement). On the basis of the differences in performance between over- and underperformers, categories of importance, target scores and a questionnaire for the assessment of factors for improvement will be developed. In Phase II, endoscopists from PCSP screening centres previously categorized as underperformers and average performers will be randomized in 1:1 ratio either to control (no intervention) or intervention arm. The subjects in the control arm will not be trained or informed about study participation. The endoscopists assigned to the intervention arm will be invited to take part in one training session designed in Phase I of the study (according to the evaluation questionnaire from Phase I). Willing overperformers will be asked to participate in the training as teachers. The training session will be divided into two parts: theoretical - presentation of research on painless colonoscopy - and practical - colonoscopy performance with commentary. Subjects matched 1:1 with trainers will take part in such a session, supervised by the study coordinator. Each endoscopist who underwent training in the second phase of the study will be sent a written, customized feedback on changes after the intervention and information about factors to improve (as per evaluation questionnaire from Phase I of the study). All endoscopists enrolled into Phase II will be followed through PCSP database for the endpoint of painful colonoscopy rate; the intervention arm will be compared with the control group at 6 and 12 months after feedback in order to investigate whether the adjusted painful colonoscopy rate improved as a result of the intervention.
This study aims to investigate the role of gut microbiome pattern and inflammation marker NF-ҡB in young-onset colorectal cancer
adherence of digital follow-up in a population of elderly patients.
To evaluate the safety of GEN1042 in patients with malignant solid tumors