There are more than 498,563 clinical trials published worldwide with over 60,000 trials that are currently either recruiting or not yet recruiting. Use our filters on this page to find more information on current clinical trials or past clinical trials (free or paid) for study purposes and read about their results.
There is currently no universally accepted, comprehensive, or standard systematic way to teach the epidural block. Typical teaching of epidural catheter placement consists of a combination of didactic education and hands-on experience, where apprentice and master approached the task together in the clinical setting, with live patients as the learning model. The learning curve is one of the most common tools to assess how the physician in training is progressing at a skill, and it is defined as a curve generated by plotting the success or failure against the number of attempts. More complex learning curves using an acceptable and unacceptable failure rate can be constructed. To perform these more complex learning curves a statistical tool such as the Cumulative Sum Technique (CUSUM) may be used. The CompuFlo Epidural Trainer can differentiate tissue types by pressure signatures that are imperceptible to touch. This allows the trainee to accurately identify the needle location and discriminate between false and true loss of resistance. Having displayed, recorded and printed a graph illustrating the procedure, may also lead to a greater appreciation of the anatomy of the structures the needle must pass. Eye-tracking is the process of measuring either the point of gaze or the motion of an eye relative to the head. This method has been successfully used for proficiency assessment. The aim of this study will be to investigate whether the use of a Structured Didactic Model (SDM) including standardized video lessons, construction of a 3D epidural module, practical training by using an epidural simulator with CompuFlo Trainer instrument, eye tracking assisted technique, may affect the CUSUM learning curve for lumbar epidural block in novice, inexperienced trainees and their eye-tracking patterns.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a digital intervention in reducing suicide attempts.
The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes between two immobilization methods for pediatric proximal half both bone forearm fractures.
Tapia syndrome is a rare and poorly understood pathology. It is defined by a concomitant attack of the recurrent (branch of X) and hypoglossal (XII) nerves of peripheral or central origin. It is characterized by the paralysis of a vocal cord and the ipsilateral half of tongue. This damage is most often unilateral but it can also be bilateral. It results in dysphonia and swallowing disorders. Tapia syndrome is a rare and poorly understood pathology. To date, less than 100 cases have been described in the literature. Previous works are mainly case reports and literature reviews. No prevalence study has been performed to date. Furthermore, disagreements persist regarding the semiology. Indeed, the involvement of the soft palate is not always described.
Research Hypothesis: Lisfranc tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis is a reliable surgical procedure, allowing the restoration of satisfactory function and a painless foot with an acceptable complication rate. Objective of the study: To analyze the clinical and radiographic results in the medium term of arthrodesis of the Lisfranc tarsometatarsal joint in cases of primary osteoarthritis, post-traumatic osteoarthritis or in cases of inflammatory pathology.
A prospective comparison between standard deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (S-DALK) performed manually using a blade (trephine) and femtosecond laser-enabled deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (IE DALK), where incisions are performed using the femtosecond laser.
Public deliberation is a novel method for engaging the public in collective decision-making. Its goal is to facilitate debate and discussion that: 1) fosters the formation of reasonable and informed opinions, 2) permits participants to revise their perspectives and positions in light of new information and dialogue with others, and 3) encourages participants to consider not only their own preferences but also the greater goal of a policy or resolution that is justifiable for all persons affected by the issue under debate. Public deliberation involves: in-depth education on the topic of interest, presentation of conflicting perspectives from expert witnesses and key stakeholders, facilitated public discussion of core issues, and development of resolutions that are acceptable to participants. Public deliberation requires significant commitment from deliberants who are actively engaged over the course of several sessions. Public deliberation can be successful when more traditional methods of stakeholder engagement fail, as it allows for in-depth discussion and demonstrated awareness of the moral difference in deciding for oneself and others. Minor consent to biomedical HIV prevention research highlights difficulties with consent, particularly for minors, and how key ethical principles may come into conflict. Typically, institutions and investigators rely upon parental permission to protect minors from research-related harm and coercion. However, the parent permission model may be harmful in stigmatizing health research such as HIV. The consent process creates potential for disclosure of the minor's sensitive behaviors and/or identities to their parents who were otherwise unaware of them. This risk is heightened for sexual and gender minority adolescents, who may face physical and social harm when their sexual or gender identities are disclosed. This risk of harm, and the ethical conflict it creates has contributed to delays in clinical trials and clinical use of HIV prevention methods in minors. This project will test public deliberation as a method for improving consent processes for engaging individuals from marginalized communities in clinical research on sensitive or stigmatizing health problems. The investigators use minor consent for biomedical HIV prevention research as an exemplar case. The primary hypothesis is that public deliberation will produce a resolution to ethical conflicts in minor consent that is better or different from the results of more traditional study approaches (e.g. surveys, in depth interviews).
Vancomycin, a glycopeptide antibiotic, is commonly prescribed as initial therapy for hospitalized patients due to its broad gram-positive coverage. Vancomycin is used for the treatment and prevention of a variety of bacterial infections ranging from streptococcal to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections.1 Notable adverse effects of intravenous vancomycin include nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity and hypersensitivity reactions. Given its pharmacokinetic profile, therapeutic drug monitoring is essential in determining the therapeutic efficacy of vancomycin as well as for avoiding nephrotoxicity.
Kidney injury is a common complication following liver transplantation and is associated with a higher complication rate and increased risk of death. While there are many factors that likely contribute to kidney injury in the perioperative period, a relative low serum level of angiotensin 2 (Ang 2) (a protein hormone that causes blood vessels to narrow) found in patients with liver cirrhosis (late stage of liver damage) may increase their risk of developing acute kidney injury (sudden episode of kidney failure or damage). We propose to investigate how early administration of Ang 2, a new vasopressor drug approved by the FDA in December 2017 for patients with low blood pressure, during the intra-operative period of liver transplant surgery affects the rate of kidney injury after transplantation. Patients who are deemed appropriate candidates for the study will be randomized 1:1 to the treatment and control groups. The intervention period of the study will occur in the operating room during transplant surgery and will be performed by their anesthesiologists. In the Treatment group, patients will receive Ang 2 infusions in addition to other standard vasopressors while patients in the control group will receive standard vasopressors alone. The infusion of Ang 2 in the treatment group will continue through the duration of the surgery and will be stopped prior to leaving the operating room. Both the treatment group and the control group will then be followed for 14 days to evaluate rates of kidney injury and to look for any complications. The follow up period will be extended to 28 days to look at in-hospital mortality rates in both groups. The daily follow up analysis will occur while the enrolled patients are inpatient following their transplantation surgery and will be done by looking at lab values and other data that is routinely gathered by their managing teams. This study will serve as a pilot study to evaluate feasibility of our protocol and to collect some preliminary data on the use of Ang 2 in this patient population. As such we plan to enroll approximately 30 patients who have accepted an offer to receive a donor liver. We hope to reach our goal enrollment within 5 months of starting the study.
20 trained sprinter were divided into caffeine Gum trial (CAF) and Placebo trial (PL) with a randomized, double-blind study design. The participants chewing either caffeine Gum (CAF trial, containing 3 mg/kg of caffeine) or Placebo Gum (PL) for 10 minutes. The outcomes are Running-Based Anaerobic Sprint Test and 400-meter sprint test was performed.