View clinical trials related to Breast Neoplasms.
Filter by:VAGINAL PRASTERONE in the treatment of VAGINAL ATROPHY IN PATIENTS WITH BREAST CANCER TREATMENT WITH AROMATASE INHIBITORS (VIBRA STUDY)
This phase II trial studies the effect of a digital application (app), BNT001, on cognitive-behavioral stress management in patients with stage I-III breast or lung cancer. The app is designed for cancer patients to treat anxiety and depressive symptoms related to their cancer diagnosis. The purpose of this study is to develop and refine procedures for eligibility screening, suicide risk assessment, and delivery of the app prior to the launch of a phase III randomized trial. The impact of the app in managing stress and improving quality of life and mood is a secondary aim.
The dose escalation phase of this trial identifies the safety, side effects and best dose of ceralasertib (AZD6738) when given in combination with trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a) in treating patients with solid tumors that have a change (mutation) in the HER2 gene or protein and have spread to other places in the body (advanced). The dose expansion phase (phase Ib) of this trial compares how colorectal and gastroesophageal cancers with HER2 mutation respond to treatment with a combination of ceralasertib and trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab deruxtecan alone. Ceralasertib may stop the growth of tumor cells and may kill them by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Trastuzumab deruxtecan is a monoclonal antibody, called trastuzumab, linked to a chemotherapy drug, called deruxtecan. Trastuzumab attaches to HER2 positive cancer cells in a targeted way and delivers deruxtecan to kill them. Ceralasertib and trastuzumab deruxtecan may be safe, tolerable and effective in treating patients with advanced solid tumors expressing the HER2 protein or gene.
This Phase 1 dose-escalation trial is to determine the safety, tolerability and recommended phase 2 dose of talazoparib in combination with belinostat in subjects with Metastatic Breast Cancer, Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer, and Metastatic Ovarian Cancer.
Breast cancer patients who undergo neoadjuvant systemic therapy and have residual breast cancer identified at the time of surgery exhibit a high (>50%) risk of future life-threatening recurrences and death.
The aim of this randomised controlled and double-blind study, is to compare the effects of erector spinae plane (ESP) and thoracic epidural (TEA) blocks on peri-operative hemodynamics and analgesia in patients undergoing unilateral mastectomies due to malignancy.
This study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of an antibody drug conjugate U3-1402 (patritumab deruxtecan) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC).
Randomized phase 2 trial to evaluate the efficacy of local therapy for oligometastasis from ER/PR-positive breast cancer. The study hypothesis is that local therapy in addition to systemic therapy improves progression-free survival in comparison with systemic therapy alone.
Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer is not usually considered curative. Recent retrospective studies have demonstrated that resection of the breast tumor in patients with primary metastatic breast cancer is associated with a significant improvement of the prognosis. In all these aforementioned studies, the decision to perform surgery could have been influenced by favorable prognostic factors, such as younger age, the presence of only one metastatic site, or good response to systemic therapy. To rule out the impact of potential confounders, most studies adjusted for age, tumor size, number and sites of metastases and hormone receptor status. In addition, some studies also adjusted for comorbidity or surgical margins. For example, in the study of Bafford et al., the benefit of surgery seemed confined to patients operated upon before diagnosis of metastatic disease and there was no survival advantage in patients who received an operation of the breast tumor after the diagnosis of the metastatic disease had taken place. This phenomenon was referred to as the stage migration bias. In a study by Leung et al., the benefit from surgery disappeared in the multivariate analysis when taking into account the use of chemotherapy. Finally, in a study by Cady et al. coding errors in the retrospectively collected dataset were found to explain part of the survival advantage. 4Therefore, this randomized controlled trial (RCT) has been initiated. In the literature, several retrospective studies noted that 35-60% of patients with metastatic cancer at the time of diagnosis received local treatment of primary lesions, which resulted in a positive impact on survival. However, an analysis of 16,023 patients presenting with stage IV disease and an intact primary tumor compared outcomes between patients having surgery of the primary tumor to negative margins or no surgery. In a multivariate analysis adjusting for known prognostic factors, surgery reduced the HR for death to 0.61 (95% CI = 0.58 to 0.65). Multiple other retrospective studies from single institutions, registries, and population-based cohorts have confirmed this initial observation, but it is uncertain whether these studies reflect a real benefit for surgery or consistent selection bias. Three prospective randomized trials are examining the role of surgery in patients presenting with stage IV disease and an intact primary tumor. While awaiting the results of these trials, it is not known precisely how or when to integrate such surgical management into a standard medical therapy for metastatic breast cancer or which patients, in particular, are most likely to benefit from such treatment. 1 The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of surgery of the primary tumor in breast cancer patients with distant metastatic disease at initial diagnosis. According to the controversies in previous studies design of a study with the least confounding factor to decrease the bias seems to be necessary.
This study is a randomized controlled trial, taking place at the University Hospital Basel (CH). It aims at the alleviation of breast cancer patients' life quality during chemotherapy. The intervention group will participate in 10 sessions of structured hypnotherapy during the course of chemotherapy in addition to the standard of care. The control group will have access to the standard of care without any additional treatment. The main goal of the study is to investigate whether quality of life is higher among patients in the intervention group. Additionally, it will be analyzed if the interventions have a positive effect on chemotherapy side effects, symptoms of anxiety and depression and the immune system. Finally, the relative dose intensity (RDI) as well as treatment schedule adherence will be assessed. There are no risks to be expected from the intervention itself. In the case of positive findings, the standard of psycho-oncological care can be updated by integrating structured hypnotherapeutic interventions into the treatment of patients with breast cancer.