View clinical trials related to Breast Neoplasms.
Filter by:Summary Points: 1. High Risk Breast Cancers: Triple negative cancer is considered high risk due to high rate of local and systemic failure. Newer innovative treatment strategies are needed to improve systemic control of disease and survival. 2. Immune system modulation: is an emerging modality in cancer treatment. Tumor antigens can stimulate T cells to identify and destroy cancer cells. Cancers express "altered self" antigens that tend to induce weaker responses than the "foreign" antigens expressed by infectious agents. Thus, immune stimulants and adjuvant approaches have been explored widely. Opportunities to develop effective cancer vaccines may benefit from seminal recent advances in understanding how immunosuppressive barricades are erected by tumors to mediate immune escape. This concept is precisely applicable to triple negative breast cancer due to their antigenicity. Checkpoint inhibitors are an attractive method for treatment of high-risk breast cancers. However, to leverage the efficacy of checkpoint inhibition, approaches are needed to enhance delivery of cancer antigens to the T cells. 3. Cryoablation: offers an efficacious and safe method to enhance tumor antigen presentation to the immune cells while destroying the primary tumor. This ablation method is superior by virtue of antigen preservation in situ despite toxicity to the tumor cell. Impact of cryoablation in enhancing immunological responses in tumor microenvironment are well established; however, cryoablation can also cause tumor antigen tolerance via non-specific stimulation of T cells. 4. Rationale for combining cryoablation and checkpoint inhibitors: Since checkpoint inhibitors curtail the tolerance developed by tumor antigens, and cryoablation enhances antigen presentation and T cell recruitment, it is intuitive that combination of these two approaches presents an ideal opportunity to leverage the benefits of both approaches while curtailing the limitations of either. Therefore, the investigators hypothesize in this study that their combination will improve the response rate and the degree of response.
The purpose of this study is to find out if adding vericiguat to standard treatment for cancer therapy related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is more effective than standard treatment alone. The addition of vericiguat to the usual treatment could help improve cardiac function, but it could also cause side effects. This study will help researchers find out whether this different treatment is better, the same as, or worse than the usual approach.
The study is being conducted to evaluate VEGFR BP102 with nab-paclitaxe or treatment of physician's choice (TPC) versus nab-paclitaxe or TPC in patients for basal-like immune suppressed (BLIS) subtype of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in the first-line teatment of unresectable locally advanced or metastatic TNBC.
This trial is a single-arm study. The purpose of the trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chidamide and fulvestrant in HR+/HER2- breast cancer that has failed prior adjuvant endocrine therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors.
This study is a single-center,blinded, efficacious, phase III randomized clinical trial initiated by investigators. The primary objective is to investigate the use of Surface Guided Radiation Therapy (SGRT) in combination with Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) technique for left breast cancer treatment, compared to traditional laser alignment with free breathing treatment. This approach offers superior positioning accuracy and improved heart protection without any increase in radiation or adverse reactions.
The goal of this observational study is to assess the effectiveness of the mDETECT breast cancer blood test at monitoring treatment response in women with metastatic breast cancer undergoing treatment.
The combination of epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (EC) and paclitaxel (Tax) is one of the main chemotherapy treatments used in breast cancer patients. These treatments, which can be combined with anti-HER2 therapy using trastuzumab, are frequently associated with side effects including cardiac toxicity. However, this cardiac toxicity has only been demonstrated several months after treatment and using global indices such as ejection fraction. The assessment of myocardial dysfunction using regional deformations and the kinetic of this dysfunction during chemotherapy treatment has never been performed. In order to counteract these myocardial dysfunctions, it is essential to better describe the kinetic of the cardiac toxicity by initiating measurements since the beginning of the treatment, in order to be able to propose adapted countermeasures (e.g. exercise training) in parallel with the chemotherapy.
This randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled Phase II trial was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of GM1 in the prevention of peripheral neuropathy caused by albumin-bound paclitaxel regimen in breast cancer patients.This study was randomly divided into 3 groups at 1:1:1 with 50 subjects in each group Subjects received study treatment until the end of treatment for a total of 4/6 cycles. The treatment period was GM1/ placebo combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel therapy. GM1 / placebo was administered 1 day before administration (D0), on the day of administration (D1) and on the day after administration (D2), and albumin-bound paclitaxel was administered starting on day D1, with a total of 4/6 cycles.
The goal of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of BCD-178 and Perjeta as neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer. Subjects with histologically confirmed diagnosis of HER2-positive invasive breast cancer (stage II-III, tumor size > 2 cm), with no estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors will be randomized to one of two treatment groups (BCD-178 group or Perjeta group) in a 1:1 ratio.
This study aims to enroll premenopausal patients, with early breast cancer who are non-low-risk and hormone receptor-positive and have undergone prior surgical intervention at the Breast Cancer Center of Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. These participants, receiving tamoxifen (TAM), toremifene (TOR), or aromatase inhibitors (AI) as adjuvant endocrine therapy and undergoing ovarian function suppression (OFS) treatment, will be divided into three groups, namely TOR+OFS, TAM+OFS, AI+OFS. The study will compare the efficacy and safety of TOR+OFS to that of TAM+OFS or AI+OFS in premenopausal estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients by comparing the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and quality of life etc. The objective is to evaluate whether TOR+OFS is non-inferior to TAM+OFS or AI+OFS in this specific patient population.