Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Active, not recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05985551 |
Other study ID # |
UUBreast03 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Active, not recruiting |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
January 1, 2020 |
Est. completion date |
October 30, 2027 |
Study information
Verified date |
May 2024 |
Source |
Uppsala University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The goal of this study was to assess the feasibility of SLND by superparamagnetic iron oxide
nanoparticles (SPIO) in patients with early breast cancer planned for primary systemic
therapy (PST) and whether this is affected by the timeframe of SPIO administration.
For this, patients with cN0/1 disease planned for PST received radioisotope as per routine on
the day of surgery or the day before, and SPIO was injected in an extended timeframe, at any
point from the day of surgery to before the induction of PST.
The main points to investigate are:
1. If the SPIO detection rate and concordance to the radiosotope are affected by time of
SPIO injection
2. If the nodal yield and the accuracy of the procedure are affected
Description:
Superparamagnetic Iron Nanoparticles (SPIO) have shown comparable performance to the standard
of Radioisotope (RI) +/- blue dye (BD) for Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in breast cancer,
with the advantage of clinical convenience due to easier accessibility, disposal and
injection days before surgery.
More interestingly, SPIO provides the possibility for delayed SLND in the setting of a
preoperative diagnosis of DCIS, enabling SLN detection weeks after breast surgery, only when
specimen pathology has demonstrated invasive cancer, as shown in the SentiNot study. The role
of SPIO for SLND in the setting of primary systemic therapy (PST) has not been extensively
investigated, while the timeframe from SPIO administration to successful SLN detection in a
similar fashion to SentiNot, but in the setting of PST has yet to been defined.
Current evidence suggest that RI-based SLN detection is the accepted standard following PST,
with RI-based dual mapping specifically recommended in cN+-to-ycN0 patients, when SLND or
targeted axillary dissection (TAD) are performed, as the number of SLNs retrieved has been
inversely linked to the false negative rate of the procedure.
Apart from the logistic benefits of SPIO administration prior to PST, an aspect of potential
interest is the ability to map the axilla, before the fibrotic changes induced by
chemotherapy and lymphatic remodelling occur, that are a concern, especially in the
node-positive patients at presentation.
However, in this case, it is imperative to investigate that SPIO remains detectable after a
prolonged period of administration and that it does not migrate to higher nodal echelons.
While preliminary data suggested feasibility, the aim of this dedicated study was to
investigate the width of timeframe of SPIO administration in patients undergoing PST and how
SPIO-based detection and concordance to the RI are affected.
In this study, patients scheduled for SLND or TAD after surgery will undergo the procedure
with RI as the standard of care and will moreover receive SPIO. The administration of SPIO
will take place either on the preoperative period but after the completion of PST, or before
the induction of PST. The reason for this is to create a wide time-frame to allow for
conclusion with regards to whether the mapping of the axilla prior PST by SPIO is a feasible
technique that will then be addressed in a dedicated trial.