View clinical trials related to Brain Injuries.
Filter by:In the investigator's institute there is ongoing treatment of different patients with cognitive deficits using Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). These patients undergo neuro-cognitive function computerized tests before and after treatment. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the cognitive changes before and after HBOT in different patients populations.
Although neuroplasticity of the brain is high in childhood, some neuropsychological sequelae could persist over the long term in children with Acquired Brain Injury (ABI). Many children with TBI, show deficits in pragmatic abilities that usually persist. Pragmatic difficulties have been observed also in children with sequelae of brain neoplasms . The lack of validated assessment tools for this population is described in literature. This limit is also valid for the tests that assess pragmatic abilities. The tests that SLPs usually administer investigate only the comprehension of verbal pragmatic and, sometimes the comprehension of linguistic and emotional prosody as well. This could lead to the risk that, sometimes, some pragmatic abilities might not be included in the evaluation. Moreover, it leads to a harder definition of the treatment aims and a harder objective demonstration of treatment outcomes. For these reasons, it is important to use an assessment tool that provides information on all the pragmatic abilities, not only in input but also in output. Some Italian researchers, recently, developed a test that investigates all these areas. It is called "ABaCo", and it is based on the Cognitive Pragmatics Theory. This theory is focused on cognitive processes underlying human communication. This test is standardized on a normative group of 300 adults. It was developed with the aim of assessing pragmatic abilities in adults with brain injuries. The assessor shows short videos to the patient, and he/her has to complete or understand the interaction transmitted through different communication channels. The authors also created an adaptation of this test for children aged 5 to 8.6 years old, modifying some items. After that, they administered this adaptation of the test to 390 healthy children. In another study, the authors administered this version of the batteries to children with autism spectrum disorders and to a control group of healthy children, matched by age and sex. Considering all the studies that already exist for the application of this assessment tool in childhood and adolescence, and the perspective of a standardization for developmental ages, this study aims to investigate whether this test could be useful to detect pragmatic difficulties also in children with ABI.
A pilot study to evaluate feasibility for a full-scale merit application. Specifically, for veterans considering prolonged exposure (PE) therapy, following the model established by Foa et al, we need to establish safety, and feasibility of quetiapine compared to treatment as usual (TAU) which employs multiple medications commonly used for PTSD in the VA system.
The purpose of the study is to validate the clinical outcome in patients with closed head injuries (GCS 14-15, ages 18-85) who are being evaluated for head trauma, integrating the BrainScope One structural injury classifier (SIC) algorithm, with focus on SIC negative classification. In addition, to assess functional impairment (concussion) in these patients, results from Brain Function Index (BFI) or Concussion Index (CI) algorithms will be used for analysis.
The purpose of this study is to observe the relationship between the level of lipid peroxidation products in serum of patients with traumatic brain injury and secondary coagulation disorders.
Neurogenic paraosteoarthropathies are peri-articular bone formations that may occur as a result of central neurological injury. Their occurrence limits reeducation and recovery capacities. Neurogenic paraosteoarthropathies sometimes cause complications (pain, joint stiffness, vascular and nerve compression, pressure sores) in patients already suffering from severe neurological sequelae affecting functional prognosis. A lot of clinical research work has been carried out within Dr Salga team. Subsequently, a collaboration was born with fundamental research teams (Pr Levesque, Pr Le Bousse Kerdilès, Pr Banzet, Pr Genêt) allowing translational work between humans and animals. The clinical application of recent research findings now makes it possible to launch the very first prospective study on neurogenic paraosteoarthropathies.
This is a prospective study enrolling 5 patients with a diagnosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI) without polytrauma and 5 patients with TBI with polytrauma admitted to the University of Kentucky (UK) Chandler Medical Center to evaluate differences in platelet bioenergetics in the populations. Additionally, five healthy subjects will be recruited to the control group.
The aim of the study is to look if Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score score in detecting a eary Sepsis is afflicted by neurosurgical disorders
Service members and veterans (SMVs) report more persisting symptoms following traumatic brain injury (TBI) compared to civilian populations (Ommaya, Ommaya, Dannenber, & Salazar, 1996). Therefore, it is important to utilize interventions that reduce psychological impairments and increase resiliency during military TBI rehabilitation. Unlike traditional behavioral health treatments that focus on reducing maladaptive behaviors and negative thoughts, positive psychological treatments focus on increasing positive emotions to increase well-being. There is substantial growing evidence demonstrating that cultivating positive emotions is preventative and improves resiliency and psychological (Bolier et al., 2013; Sin & Lyumbomirsky, 2009), cognitive (Estrada, Isen, & Young, 1997; Ashby & Isen, 1999; Isen & Daubman, 1984; Isen, Daubman, & Nowicki, 1987; Fredrickson & Branigan, 2001), and health outcomes (Pressman & Cohen, 2005). This study will examine the effectiveness of traditional behavioral health treatment versus behavioral health treatment with an added positive psychological group treatment in terms of psychological, cognitive, and health outcomes during TBI rehabilitation. The hypothesis is that SMV's with TBI will experience improved outcomes with added positive psychological treatment compared to traditional behavioral health treatment alone. There will be about 100 people taking part in the study, randomly assigned to either a traditional behavioral health treatment group or an alternative behavioral health treatment group (therefore, up to 50 people will be enrolled in each) at the Fort Belvoir Intrepid Spirit Center over a period of 30 months. Study participants will be randomly assigned to groups, and over 3 months the study procedures include participating in group behavioral health treatment and/or individual behavioral health treatment and completing pre/post-treatment questionnaires focusing on psychological, cognitive, and health outcomes. The behavioral health intervention has not been well-studied; thus, the behavioral health intervention is considered experimental for the treatment of psychological symptoms. Additionally, the impact on other areas of functioning (i.e., cognitive functioning and overall health) is currently unknown.
High rates of patients with frontal brain damage show serious cognitive functional deficits, which negatively impact their quality of life and are linked with poor clinical outcomes. Sulforaphane has shown significant antioxidant and cellular protective effects in animal models associated with oxidative stress, such as focal cerebral ischemia, brain inflammation, and intracranial hemorrhage. Preclinical research has shown that sulforaphane can significantly improve spatial localization and working memory impairment after brain damage. The primary aim of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy of sulforaphane for improving cognitive function in patients with frontal brain damage.