View clinical trials related to Atrial Fibrillation.
Filter by:Patients with permanent or persistent atrial fibrillation require rate control medication to prevent excessive tachycardia. Since too much medication leads to a lower than expected heart rate (low output and symptoms) and too little leads to a fast heart rate (with associated symptoms), finding the ideal medication level (target that could fluctuate) is vital for patient's wellbeing. Clinicians adjust the medication each time patients come into the clinic (once or twice a year). In between those visits, medication is not changed even though patients would benefit for some incremental medication adjustment. Patients implanted with Biotronik devices have access to Home Monitoring® (HM), a user friendly remote monitoring system transmitting daily device and patient information to clinicians. Heart rate and activity hours can be tracked and this information could be used to adjust medication. In a step by step process, patients will gradually gain autonomy in the weekly adjustment of their rate control medication. In order to guide medication adjustment by patients, the research team will filter and simplify the information received by HM before sending it to patients. It is hypothesize that patient empowerment, understanding the dynamics of their heart rates in relation to the amount of medication used, will lead to better heart rate control, and it will improve the daily hours of patients activity.
A clinical randomised trial to compare strategies for ablation in persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation comprising of two arms: pulmonary veins isolation (PVI) only and PVI + individualised mapping-guided ablation (Cartofinder, Biosense Webster Inc.)
Statins have rapid and significant actions that have potentially important (but not yet proven) implications for postoperative atrial fibrillation and cardiac protection in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The focus of this study is, therefore, on patients having surgical aortic valve replacement (with aortotomy) and the development of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF). Our aims are: to investigate the risk of POAF, infection or other complications after SAVR in continuous versus preoperative discontinuous treatment with statins. The study is a single centre randomized controlled trial with continuance treatment with statin vs. discontinuance (7 to 14 days prior surgery until the 30th post-operative day included), on patients undergoing elective solitary SAVR with bioprosthesis with prior usage of statins the last 3 months and of at least 7 days. This randomized studies will address 2 separate hypotheses in patients undergoing open heart operation with solitary aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic valve that 1. Discontinuation of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors 7 to 14 days preoperative until 30 days postoperative of AVR in patients with prior use of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors is not associated with increased early (<30 days) risk of POAF. 2. Discontinuation of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors 7 to 14 days preoperative until 30 days postoperative of AVR in patients with prior use of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors is not associated with increased early (<30 days) and intermediate (<1 year) risk of mortality, MI, stroke and rehospitalisation.
The aim of this research is to classify patients by the dominant mechanism of continuous atrial electrical activation during atrial fibrillation. This approach seeks to improve on existing classifications which are based solely on the duration of the arrhythmia (<7 days, >7 days and >1 year). This is a cohort study. Patients undergoing clinically indicated electrophysiology study or AF ablation will have invasive assessment of cardiac electrophysiological profile at the time of their planned procedure, undergo 2-week ambulatory monitoring before and after the procedure, complete symptom questionnaires before and after their procedure and undergo atrial cardiac magnetic resonance imaging before their procedure.
Assess the clinical safety and feasibility of MultiPulse Therapy (MPT) electrical stimulation waveform sequence in terminating paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation.
The study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness comparisons between warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban in routine clinical practice among Japanese non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD).
The goal of the TCD-CA study is to determine the frequency of cerebral embolization during pulmonary vein isolation using continuous transcranial Doppler examination. Different parts of the procedure, different ablation techniques and periprocedural anticoagulation regimes will be compared.
This is a retrospective observational study drawing on data from the Brigham and Women's Home Hospital database. Sociodemographic and clinic data from a training cohort were used to train a machine learning algorithm to predict patient deterioration throughout a patient's admission. This algorithm was then validated in a validation cohort.
This observational prospective clinical investigation will evaluate the performance on an Artificial Intelligence (AI) solution interpreting ECG (electrocardiogram) collected from an Apple Watch (AI-AW) in the detection of Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Title: PeAF-Box. Feasibility, Safety and Efficacy of Isolating the Left Atrial Posterior Wall (PWI) added to Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) as First-Line Strategy in Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (PeAF) Design: A prospective, observational, single center, unblinded, clinical study with 3 years of follow-up and two interventional procedures: An index ablation procedure and a reassessment/ reablation procedure after 6 months. Background: In patients with PeAF the effect of first-line ablation with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is smaller than in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), where PVI alone is effective in reducing symptoms and increasing quality of life. Adding PWI to PVI is increasingly used despite concerns about safety and efficacy. Objectives: (1) To use PVI + PWI as first-line ablation-strategy in participants with PeAF and to assess the feasibility of obtaining that goal. (2) To assess the safety of applying this lesion set - in terms of heat-induced injury to the esophagus - using esophagoscopy. 3) To asses arrhythmia burden using continuous monitoring for 3 years after ablation. (4) To assess the durability of the PVI + PWI lesion set by a relook/ reablation procedure after 6 months. (5) To follow the effect of PVI + PWI on participants' quality of life over three years. Study site: Dept of Cardiology - Electrophysiology Laboratory, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen. Study population: 24 patients referred for ablation of PeAF are asked for informed consent for these elements that surpass standard treatment in PeAF: (1) Taking amiodarone for 3 weeks prior to the index procedure to 3 weeks after the procedure, (2) Additional ablation with PWI compared to standard first-line therapy with PVI only. (3) Implantation of an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM), (4) Post-procedure esophagoscopy, (5) Regular clinic visits for 3 years post procedure, (6) Undergoing an interventional relook/ reablation procedure 6 months after the index procedure. Anticoagulation drugs during the procedure and follow up: To prevent thromboses participants are prescribed periprocedural oral anticoagulant treatment to be continued for shorter or longer/lifelong periods according to the participants' risk of thrombosis (the CHA2DS2-VASC score). Anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs): Except from periprocedural amiodarone treatment, no AADs are allowed during the follow-up apart from occurrence of otherwise untreatable arrhythmias.