View clinical trials related to Asthma.
Filter by:GeoAsma is a study for the definition, validation and evaluation of predictive models on the influence of the environment on asthmatic patients in Andalusia.
To collect, preserve, and/or distribute annotated biospecimens and associated medical data to institutionally approved, investigator-directed biomedical research to discover and develop new treatments, diagnostics, and preventative methods for specific and complex conditions.
This study will report the frequency, risks factors, clinical care and estimate the future asthma risk of children and young people (aged 5-15 years) experiencing a Delphi defined near fatal asthma (NFA) attacks in the United Kingdom (UK) and Republic of Ireland (ROI). A greater understanding of the frequency and risk factors associated with NFA could help support children and young people (CYP), parents and clinicians to identify and modify risk, both independently and through a resulting clinical care pathway and also develop future research to improve effectiveness of interventions. The study will explore both commonly identified clinical factors, but also for the first time describe in detail the variance in medical management (acute and intensive care) that could lead to future clinical trials and guideline development to standardise care. The study will also describe, through data-linkage, socio-demographic factors associated with NFA, to include pollution, pollen, weather, viral prevalence that could lead to better care for higher risk CYP. To encourage more consistent, less fragmented care following a near fatal asthma attack, the study will consider how care is provided subsequent to an NFA attack using British Paediatric Surveillance Unit (BPSU) surveillance at 12 and 24 month follow up.
Asthma is a common pathology, with a prevalence of 6 to 8% and more than 4 million patients in France. Its management is based on different therapeutic axes. Their use is very dependent on disease control, with therapeutic escalation, from treatment on demand to a combination of them at high dosage, according to the severe asthma's phenotype. Despite these effective therapeutic tools, there is a lack of control of the disease in the vast majority of cases, affecting at least 60% of asthmatics. Among the factors associated with lack of control, non-compliance with inhaled therapies is frequent and requires to be systematically assessed in the absence of control. Its evaluation by definition is complex and variously appreciated, fluctuating from 40 to 80%. The means proposed for evaluating it involve doctor/patient interviews, evaluation of the therapeutic response, questionnaires, evaluation of drug consumption (evaluation of number of empty boxes, integrated electronic device, withdrawal of drugs from pharmacies, etc). Asthma control is commonly evaluated using the validated Asthma Control Test score, in clinical practice and/or in research fields. An ACT score greater than 20 indicates well-controlled asthma. In addition, a change of at least 3 points is likely to indicate a clinically meaningful change in asthma control (Minimally Clinical Important Difference) in an individual patient over time and a change of 4 points or more further reduces the risk that the change is due to measurement error. In the context of severe eosinophilic asthma, Mepolizumab has shown its benefit in controlling asthma, reducing the number of exacerbations and its ability to decrease the use of oral corticosteroids (MENSA, SIRIUS). Mepolizumab is now available in 2 new "ready-to-use" forms: a pre-filled syringe and an auto-injector pen. Both systems can be administered at home either by a nurse or by the patient himself (self-administration). The choice is left to the discretion of the prescribing pulmonologist. These new possibilities of Mepolizumab administration offer greater freedom to the patient, possibly allowing him to empower himself by carrying out his own treatment, without constraint and without being dependent on the availability of a nurse or another healthcare professional qualified to inject Mepolizumab. These new methods of Mepolizumab self- administration also open the field to therapeutic non-compliance, a new problem in the field of biotherapies used for the treatment of severe asthma. The investigator hypothesize a potential therapeutic non-compliance associated with the new method of administration of Mepolizumab, with self-injection by the patient, without the assistance of a nurse. To assess this problem, the investigator propose to compare in a therapeutic trial Mepolizumab administered by pre-filled syringe by a home nurse every month versus Mepolizumab self-administered by auto-injector pen by the patient every month.
This is a study to look at pharmacokinetic levels of different doses of slow release DHEA in subjects with severe asthma.
This study will be a Randomized controlled and will be conducted in Allied Hospital, Faisalabad. The study will be completed within the duration of 10 months. Convenience sampling study technique will be used to collect the data. The sample size of 30 patients will be taken in this study to find the effect of flutter and PEP mask therapy on chest clearance and dyspnea. Patients will be allocated randomly in two groups and 15 patients in each group. Group A will get flutter device therapy. Group B will get PEP mask treatment. A regular follow up visits to department and a final assessment was made at the end of last week by using questionnaire and resulting improvement was shown in results after completion. Data will be analyzed on SPSS25.
Asthma is a syndrome compromising many phenotypes including N-ERD (caused by increased 4-series leukotriene (LT) production). n-3 PUFA supplementation modulates 4-series LT and has anti-inflammatory effects. However, other than in a pilot study with dietary manipulation, the effects of N-ERD are unknown. The primary objective is to determine whether n-3 PUFA supplementation in people with N-ERD can improve asthma control using the asthma control questionnaire (ACQ-7). This is a placebo controlled randomised controlled parallel multicentre study with of 6g per day of PUFA for 6 months in people with N-ERD and poor asthma control
SIMAP is a triple-masked randomised trial aimed at assessing whether an automated system of pictograms associated to medical indications results in better comprehension and adherence of said indications. Adult patients with a recent diagnosis of asthma will be randomised to receive a pictographic depiction of their treatments and recommended interventions or standard communication without assistance from their attending physician. Patients will be followed-up for 60 days using the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACT). The primary endpoint of this study is the degree of asthma control as assessed by the aforementioned questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include the number of hospitalisations, emergency care unit visits and the need to increase bronchodilator therapy as per current Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines. Outcomes will be analysed under the intention-to-treat principle by a statistician unaware of treatment allocation.
This is a single-center, randomized, SHAM-controlled, parallel assignment, double-masked,8-week interventional study among children aged 8-17 years (not yet 18 years old) of age with obesity and asthma. (n=60), recruited from Duke Health Center Creekstone, to test the effectiveness of inspiratory muscle rehabilitation (IMR) as an acceptable add-on intervention to reduce dyspnea (feeling short-of-breath or breathless) and to promote greater activity in children with obesity and asthma. Clinic to test the effectiveness of inspiratory muscle rehabilitation (IMR) as an acceptable add-on intervention to reduce dyspnea (feeling short-of-breath or breathless) and to promote greater activity in children with obesity
After outpatient clinic visit, asthmatic patients with worsening of symptoms (including dyspnea, wheezing, chest tightness, cough, activity limitation, awaken in the midnight due to discomfort) and are diagnosed of acute exacerbation by physician, will be recruited. The patients are asked to record symptoms using asthma symptom diary (ASD) with home spirometry simultaneously for 14 days. Visit 1 (day 1) All patients will be evaluated the following: 1. Record the patients' demographics (age, gender, race), baseline characteristics, comorbidities, health care resources use (visits, lab tests, hospitalization and cost), pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments 2. Blood sampling for eosinophils, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and immunoglobulin E (IgE) as clinically indicated (if no data available within one year for the last two) 3. The study assistant will introduce to the patient how to manipulate the home spirometry and its app, and to record the daily asthma symptoms by using the ASD on the mobile phone. Visit 2 (day 15) All patients will be arranged outpatient clinic follow up 2 weeks later from the first visit. The outpatient clinic physician will check the home spirometry report and ASD symptom score in the past 2 weeks, and have a well explanation of these results. Statistical analysis The usage of digital function including input ASD, and the lung function from portable spirometer in study arm will be demonstrated by descriptive statistics.