View clinical trials related to Aspiration Pneumonia.
Filter by:One of the most serious complications in the critically ill patient complaining of bulbar palsy is aspiration pneumonia. These patients are scheduled for nasogastric tube feeding trying to avoid recurrent aspiration and subsequent aspiration pneumonia. Even though, the risk of aspiration is still present. Putting a total parenteral nutrition regimen for these patients is a supposed strategy to avoid aspiration pneumonia till recovery from bulbar palsy or planning for tracheostomy and or feeding gastrostomy.
Aspiration pneumonia is a common complication in senior patients with high morbidity and mortality rate. The decline of physical function among elders can easily lead to swallowing disorders, and nasogastric (NG) tube insertion is an emergency medical treatment that provides patients with adequate hydration and nutrition. However, NG is easily dislodged after a long duration of placement; furthermore, lacking accurate feeding skills could also lead to aspiration pneumonia.
The goal of this pilot prospective cohort study is to examine the reproducibility of gastric volume and emptying as measured by gastric ultrasound and its correlation to a gold-standard test for gastric emptying in the perioperative period in pediatric patients. The main questions it aims to answer are: - What is the reliability (inter-rater variability between expert and novice assessors, and intra-rater variability) of a) the gastric antral cross-sectional area (CSA) and b) gastric volume using the Perlas US qualitative grading assessment, measured by using an ultrasound device in pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia for elective surgery? - What is the correlation between ultrasound assessment of gastric emptying by the antral-CSA and gastric emptying determined by the acetaminophen absorption test (AAT), the gold standard? The study will include two cohorts. Cohort assignment will be based on age and anesthesia induction plan. Subjects >7yrs of age and expected to get an IV induction will be assigned to Cohort #1. Subjects <7yrs of age and not expected to get an IV induction will be assigned to Cohort #2. - Cohort 1 will include abdominal ultrasound for gastric assessment AND the acetaminophen absorption test which includes administering enteral acetaminophen (tylenol) with 6 oz of water and drawing of blood samples through a peripheral intravenous line. - Cohort 2 will include subjects for whom a peripheral intravenous line placement is not part of routine pre-operative care. Procedures for Cohort 2 will include abdominal ultrasound only in the pre-op area (no tylenol). This cohort is included to examine the reliability of measurements across age groups.
This is a case series study using gastric ultrasound in critically ill patients to quantify gastric residual volumes to compare the efficacy of different NPO protocols.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of early antibiotics in ICU patients who appear to have aspirated, to help determine whether this improves outcomes by reducing the later incidence of pneumonia and other negative consequences.
the risk of aspiration pneumonitis during cesarean sections has significantly decreased. Nevertheless, precaution against gastric aspiration is still vital in patients in whom regional anesthesia contraindicated or in whom general anesthesia has to be administered (for example; during emergency cesarean delivery). The administration of intravenous anesthetics reduces the level of consciousness of a patient that compromises the protective reflexes of the upper airways. Moreover, a high level of sedation also reduces the tone of the LES (lower oesophageal sphincter). Both these situations predispose the risk of aspiration pneumonia in patients awaiting surgical interventions in supine position under general anesthesia
The two most common consequences resulting from aspiration are chemical pneumonitis and bacterial aspiration pneumonia. Both entities present with comparable clinical signs and symptoms. In the absence of a reliable clinical or biological marker to differentiate between these two conditions, most patients with suspected aspiration are treated empirically with antibiotics. De-escalation of initial antibiotic treatment is encouraged based on the results of microbiological results, usually performed before starting antimicrobial treatment. However, in most hospitals, 48-72h are required to obtain the results of microbiological cultures, and to de-escalate empirical large spectrum antibiotic treatment. The use of the Unyvero®, a multiplex PCR-based testing system, for detection of respiratory bacterial pathogens would allow decreasing the percentage of patients with aspiration syndrome who will receive unappropriated antibiotic treatment at Day 3.
Background There is no unanimous opinion about a lung-protective strategy in cardiac surgery. Small randomized clinical and animals trials suggest that ventilation during cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) could be protective on the lungs. This evidence is based on surrogate end-points and most of studies are limited to elective coronary surgery. According to the available data, an optimal strategy of lung protection during CPB cannot be recommended. The purpose of the CPBVENT study is to investigate the effectiveness of different ventilation strategies during CPB on post-operative pulmonary complications. Trial design The CPBVENT study will be a single-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. We are going to enroll 780 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with planned use of CPB, aortic cross-clamping and two lung ventilation. Patients will be randomized into three treatment groups: 1) no ventilation during CPB; 2) continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH2O during CPB; 3) ventilation with 5 acts/minute with tidal volume of 2-3 ml/Kg and a PEEP of 3-5 cmH2O during CPB. The primary end-point will be the incidence of a PaO2/FiO2 ratio <200 until the time of discharge from the ICU. The secondary end-points will be the incidence of post-operative pulmonary complications and 30-days mortality. Patients will be followed-up to 12 months after the date of randomization. Summary The CPBVENT Trial will determine whether different ventilation strategies during CPB will improve pulmonary outcome in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.