View clinical trials related to Aortic Valve Stenosis.
Filter by:Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most frequent valvulopathy in the general population in France and more generally in developed countries, due to populations aging. Its standard treatment is historically surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). In the 2000s, the management of this valvulopathy was revolutionized by the development of the technique of per-cutaneous aortic valve replacement (TAVI). TAVI opens the possibility of curative treatment to patients at high operational risk not operable by conventional surgery, and for whom outcome was affected with high mortality under medical treatment alone. Amyloidosis, a pathology with multiple etiologies, is a rare condition and its cardiac form (AC) even more (8 to 17 / 100,000 people / year). However, its prevalence is increasing. Some autopsies series have found prevalence up to 50% of cardiac amyloidosis with transthyretin (AC-TTR) after 60 years. In addition, recent data suggested that AC-TTR prevalence is higher in the population of patients with heart disease: 13% in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and up to 16% in patients with AS. The outcome of patients with AC-TTR remains unknown after TAVI. Thus, the diagnosis of AC-TTR in patients undergoing TAVI represents an important issue. Indeed, a treatment stabilizing the process of accumulation of transthyretin deposits, effective on the survival of these patients, is now available. In addition, a non-invasive screening strategy for AC-TTR, alternative to biopsy, is now validated.
Prospective, single-arm, observational study with invasive coronary physiology measurements before and after transcatheter left-sided valvular intervention.
Microvascular function in patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implant (TAVI) for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis: association with myocardial fibrosis
The aim of the present study is to investigate safety and efficacy of early versus deferred aortic valve replacement in patients with moderate aortic stenosis combined with moderate mitral regurgitation.
Aortic valve stenosis is the most common valve disease leading to surgical or percutaneous intervention in Europe and North America. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement (TAVI) is currently recommended for the management of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis and with high; very high operative risk of aortic valve replacement surgery or intermediate operative risk of aortic valve replacement surgery after a benefit-risk assessment by a heart team and operative contraindication to conventional aortic valve replacement surgery. These indications are supported by the 2017 European Cardiology guidelines. This technique of percutaneous arterial valve implantation is most often performed via the femoral route, under local anesthesia, with placement of a prosthetic biological valve in the aortic position, impacting it into the patient's native aortic valve. TAVI has been shown to be superior to medical treatment in patients with a aortic valve stenosis at very high operative risk of conventional aortic valve replacement surgery. However, the occurrence of atrioventricular conduction disorders (de novo left bundle branch block (LBBB) or complete AVB) remains the most frequent complication after TAVI. Therefore, the rate of pacemaker (PM) implantation after TAVI remains high, ranging from 2% to 51%, with an average rate of 13%. Pacemaker implantation has several deleterious effects (increased hospitalization time, desynchronization of the left ventricle by permanent right ventricular pacing, exposure of the patient to procedural complications of pacemaker placement, and possible increase in the final cost to society of the initial hospitalization. Not all patients who received a pacemaker post TAVI implantation use their PM. The rate of Pacemaker dependency and therefore of patients who actually use their pacemaker is approximately 33-36% at 1 year after percutaneous valve implantation. In view of all the potentially deleterious consequences of post TAVI pacemaker implantation, it is therefore necessary to know which patients really justify pacemaker implantation after percutaneous valve implantation. The purpose of this study is to investigate diagnostic imaging criteria that may be predictive of the occurrence of intramyocardial conduction disorders post TAVI implantation. Although some patients present only transient conductive disturbances, the impact of tissue inflammation of the intramyocardial conduction pathways after TAVI remains to be understood.
Multicenter registry data analysis of aortic valve stenosis patients that underwent elective, isolated transcutaneous aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgical aortic valve replacement between 2015 and 2019. In TAVI group only transfemoral access was considered.
The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and performance of the EMBLOK EPS during TAVR by randomized comparison with a commercially available embolic protection device. The targeted study population consists of patients meeting FDA-approved indications for TAVR with commercially available transcatheter heart valve systems. This prospective, multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial will enroll up to a total of 532 subjects undergoing TAVR at up to 30 investigational sites in the United States. All subjects will undergo clinical follow-up (including detailed neurological assessments) in-hospital and at 30 days.
The optimal pharmacological therapy after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to prevent valve thrombosis and reduce thromboembolic complications without significantly increasing the risk of bleeding is not yet fully defined and constitutes an important unmet clinical need. Recently, single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with Aspirin has been increasingly adopted to avoid bleeding early after TAVI compared with dual antiplatelet therapy. However, TAVI population is affected by a diversity of chronic pathologies that increase the risk of post-TAVI ischemic complications. Stroke is prevalent, especially peri- and early post-TAVI (<1-8% in the 1st year). Although peri-TAVI myocardial infarction (MI) is rare (1-3%), concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD), diabetes mellitus (DM), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD), is very frequent in the TAVI population, affecting around 30-70% of patients. In patients with CAD, the need to re-access the coronary arteries after TAVI is challenging and can be hampered by the trancatheter valve struts. This is critical in TAVI patients with an acute coronary syndrome and in younger patients with long-life expectancy after TAVI. The use of a P2Y12 inhibitor provides significant ischemic protection in the in the coronary, cerebral and peripheral vascular territories compare to Aspirin. The use of a P2Y12 inhibitor as antiplatelet treatment can decrease the need for new coronary revascularizations and reduce the incidence of thromboembolic complications after TAVI.
The current observational registry aims to evaluate in patients undergoing TAVI implantation: 1. the positive and negative predictive value for PPM post TAVI of Wenckebach phenomenona (WB) during RAP during the TAVI procedure, 2. baseline and procedural characteristics of TAVI-implantation associated with new conduction abnormalities and need for PPM implantation, 3. peri-procedural safety, in-hospital and 1-month outcomes after TAVI implantation.
Indication for aortic valve replacement (AVR) in aortic stenosis (AS) is currently based on the classical triad of clinical AS symptoms, estimation of AS severity, and cardiac repercussion at rest. However, presence of symptoms in elderly is often subjective and underreported, and cardiac function analysis at rest underestimates the true impact of the chronic afterload increase. This complicates the diagnosis and hampers timely aortic valve replacement therapy with an impact on prognosis and cardiac function recovery. Exercise imaging in AS may reveal underlying cardiac repercussion and symptoms at an earlier stage and therefore impact prognosis and cardiac function recovery after AVR. Therefore the principal objective of this study is to reveal the factors that determine clinical outcome and hemodynamic function recovery after AVR in AS.