View clinical trials related to Aortic Valve Stenosis.
Filter by:Severe aortic stenosis is a condition with poor life expectancy once it becomes symptomatic. There are no prospective studies illustrating the utility of cardiopulmonary stress (CPX) testing in diagnosing and prognosticating patients with paradoxically low gradient and low flow severe aortic stenosis. We aim to prospectively investigate the utility of CPX in this patient population with the hypothesis that utilizing CPX parameters would better identify higher risk patients warranting further evaluation and possibly intervention sooner.
Rationale: Cardiovascular disease and cognitive diseases are closely related. Cognitive impairment is common (21-39%) among patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. The proof-of-concept CP-TAVI study showed that increased cardiac output following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was associated with increased cerebral blood flow. It is hypothesized that increased cerebral blood flow (CBF) subsequently leads to improved cognitive functioning. Additionally, silent micro emboli caused by crushing of the calcified native valve during TAVI may cause cognitive deterioration. If it could be predicted which patients are at risk for TAVI induced cerebral micro emboli, these patients could benefit from cerebral protection devices, preventing cognitive decline. Objective: The objectives of the CAPITA study are 1A) to identify whether an increase in cardiac output after TAVI is associated with an increase of global CBF; 1B) explore regional differences in CBF after TAVI; 1C) determine whether (global or regional) increased CBF is associated with improved cognitive functioning; 1D) identify patient and procedural characteristics associated with increased cardiac output, CBF and cognitive functioning; 2A) identify the incidence and volume of new white matter hyperintensities after TAVI; 2B) evaluate patient and procedural predictors for the increase in white matter hyperintensities volume, including baseline aortic valve calcification volume, measured with computed tomography; 2C) if aortic valve calcification volume predicts new white matter hyperintensities, define a cut-off value for high-risk patients; 2D) assess whether the increase in white matter hyperintensity volume is associated with deterioration of cognitive scores. Study design: Prospective observational study, measuring cardiac output (echocardiography), cerebral blood flow (arterial spin labelling magnetic resonance imaging) and cognitive functioning (neuropsychological test battery) prior to TAVI (<24 hours to <one week) and at 3 months follow-up. At one year follow-up, cardiac output and cognitive function will be assessed. Study population: Patients with severe aortic valve stenosis eligible for transfemoral TAVI (n=142). Main study parameters/endpoints: Cardiac output (L/min), cerebral blood flow (mL/100g/min, change in %, relative to baseline) and cognitive functioning (extensive neuropsychological testing 60-90 minutes).
The aim of the proposed study is to evaluate microcirculatory alterations in patients undergoing open heart surgery with minimal invasive versus conventional extracorporeal circulation. Positive clinical results evidenced with goal-directed perfusion and cerebral oximetry monitoring could be attributed to preserved microcirculation at tissue level.
The EMPIRE study confirms the technical performance of the new IMPERIA Delivery System and evaluates the safety and efficacy of the entire ALLEGRA THV System. The primary endpoint is device success rate at 7 days (discharge from index procedure or 7 days post implant, whichever comes first), as defined by VARC 2. Based on the outcomes of a study with a similar device and considering a drop-out rate of 5%, 107 patients need to be enrolled in the study.
Data on valve performance following ViV-TAVR has usually been obtained with the use of Doppler-echocardiography. However, some reports have shown significant discordances in the evaluation of mean transvalvular gradient between echocardiography and catheterization, with an overestimation of the real gradient with echo (vs. cath) in most cases. Thus, the incidence of procedural-device failure may be lower than that reported in the ViV-TAVR literature,
Over the last years, several randomized studies comparing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) have established TAVI as a treatment option in symptomatic patients with aortic stenosis (AS) (1,2,3). Most transcatheter heart valves (THV) available are designed on either a balloon-expandable (BE) or a self-expanding (SE) concept. Despite major differences, both designs are recommended to be used indifferently in most of the clinical situations and a significant number of centers only implant one of this two THV design. It remains unclear however, whether these 2 very different THV concepts are achieving similar or different clinical outcomes and could be considered a single "Class" of device. While there is an urgent clinical need to clarify this issue in an exponentially growing therapeutic field, to date no large randomized study powered to compare the 2 THV designs on individual endpoints has been conducted or initiated. Recently, two large-scale French registry-based propensity matched analyses, including more than 30,000 patients, have reported a higher 90 days and 1-year mortality with the use of SE as compared to BE-valve (4,5). However, as the propensity-score matching-approach cannot rule out residual confounders, and as some of the most recent THV iterations were not part of the investigation, there is an urgent need to conduct a randomized trial sufficiently powered to compare head-to-head the latest generation of SE and BE-valve on all-cause mortality. In addition, two small randomized studies have recently showed the inferiority of a new SE-valve compared to BE-valve and SE-THV (SCOPE1 trial, J Lanz. Lancet. 2019 Nov 2;394(10209):1619-1628. and SCOPE 2 trial, Circulation in press), thus further questioning wether THV should be considered as a single "Class" regardless the THV design. The objective of the present randomized clinical investigation will be to evaluate the impact of THV design (SE vs BE) on the risk of all-cause mortality at 90 days and 1 year. The present clinical investigation will the first randomized clinical investigation to compare head to head the benefit of BE-valve over SE-valve on total mortality at 90 days and 1-year using a superiority design. Previous head-to-head studies included only a small number of patients, non-inferiority designs and combined endpoints. This clinical investigation will be the first to generate sufficient evidences to change clinical practice and international guidelines to clarify whether one THV design is superior (or not) to the other one (BE vs SE-valve). The result of the clinical investigation is key for clinicians indicating the treatment and for the patients receiving the treatment
The study is designed as a retrospective, international, multi-center cohort study to evaluate Steelex® Sternum Set for sternum closure. The data from 2 clinics located in Germany and Spain participating in the "OPTICABG" as well as in the "PREMIVALVE" study will be used for assessment. Only patients receiving a complete or a partial sternotomy closed with Steelex® Sternum Set will be included in the analysis. "OPTICABG" patients were followed up 3 months after surgery and "PREMIVALVE" patients until 6 months after surgery. Adverse Events (AE) / Serious Adverse Events (SAE)(e.g. surgical site infection, sternum stability, stroke, myocardial infraction, death etc.) reported in both studies will be used for the STERCCAS analysis.
Unfractioned heparin is usually given in a defined dosage during transfemoral TAVI. Activated Clotting Time (ACT) is usually used to measure the heparin effect. ACT-analysis is easy to perform at the bedside, but susceptible to interference effects. At the end of the procedure, protamine is given to reverse eventual residual heparin effect. An overdose of protamine can impair the coagulation itself. The investigators want to analyse the effect of a partial heparin reversal by ROTEM Analysis.
Background: Severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) is the commonest valve disease. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is primarily indicated when symptoms occur and/or when there is a drop in left ventricular ejection fraction. However, irreversible myocardial damage, such as replacement fibrosis, leads to increased morbidity and mortality despite treatment. Improved patient selection and timely treatment is thus warranted. T1 mapping, a non-invasive method to quantify myocardial fibrosis by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), could be a marker to guide treatment. Aims: To investigate the change of myocardial fibrosis* in AS patients following AVR and if these changes are associated with disease and/or procedural characteristics. Methods: This is an observational clinical trial. Approximately 60 patients with severe AS planned to undergo AVR (either surgical or transcatheter) at Rigshospitalet, Denmark will be included. Participants will undergo CMR before surgery and at a 1-year follow-up. Other assessments include clinical evaluation and blood sampling. The primary end-point is change in T1 values after AVR. Hypotheses and perspectives: The investigators hypothesize that (1) myocardial fibrosis* will regress in patients undergoing AVR as a group, (2) the degree of myocardial fibrosis is positively correlated with the degree of symptoms, (3) the regression of myocardial fibrosis is greater in patients undergoing TAVR compared to SAVR, and (4) the regression of myocardial fibrosis is greater in patients with tricuspid aortic stenosis compared to bicuspid aortic stenosis. Ultimately, T1 mapping is a potential marker for improved patient selection for the timing of AVR. * Estimated by T1 mapping
In one of the most severe congenital heart defects, hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS), the left ventricle is underdeveloped and the prognosis is worse than in most other heart defects. The underdevelopment can occur gradually during fetal growth caused by a narrowing of the aortic valve. At some international centers, such fetuses are treated with a balloon dilation of the narrowed valve, but there is no scientifically sound evidence that this treatment is effective. The aim of this study is: 1/ to evaluate whether balloon dilation during the fetal period of a narrowed aortic valve can reduce the risk of the left ventricle becoming underdeveloped and the baby being born with a so-called univentricular heart (HLHS); 2/ to investigate whether such treatment improves the prognosis for this group of children with a very complex and severe heart defect and 3/ to also describe side effects and risks in fetuses and mothers of the fetal procedure.