View clinical trials related to Anxiety.
Filter by:Periprocedural anxiety is a common problem for patients who undergo interventional pain procedures. Virtual Reality (VR) is an immersive experience that has gained acceptance in the medical field as a tool for reducing anxiety and pain for patients.Research Aim: To evaluate the effect of immersive virtual reality (VR) on periprocedural anxiety related to therapeutic cervical epidural steroid injections (ESI). The investigators hypothesize that immersive virtual reality will result in a clinically meaningful anxiety reduction, defined as the proportion of participants with > 50% reduction in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) anxiety scores when compared to participants in the non-treatment group who will have standard preprocedural waiting time conditions in clinic, but no VR experience. Similarly, the investigators hypothesize a significant reduction in objective sympathetic tone as measured by skin sympathetic nerve activity (SKNA).
The purpose of this study is to determine if non-invasive distracting devices (Virtual Reality headset) are more effective than the standard of care (i.e., no technology based distraction) for preventing anxiety in parental and pediatric populations
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is the most common cause of recurrent abdominal pain in children. IBS is a functional gastrointestinal disorder that is linked to motor and sensory physiology, as well as the central nervous system, that presents as abdominal pain with abnormal defecation patterns. This discomfort leads to emotional stress, decreased quality of life, and anxiety. The study proposes that yoga and mindfulness will decrease anxiety and increase quality of life for patients with IBS. The aim of this study is to measure the impact of a brief, at-home, 6-week twice per week Standardized Yoga & Meditation Program for Stress Reduction program on anxiety, IBS symptoms, and quality of life in children ages 12-21 diagnosed with IBS.
Hospitalization, medical interventions to be performed, and uncertainties specific to surgical intervention create a certain level of anxiety in the patient. It is known that being in the hospital negatively affects the coping mechanisms of the patient. In the pre-surgical period, the nurse's practices that will facilitate the patient's coping with the situation and managing his anxiety have a positive effect on anxiety during and after surgery and on anxiety-related symptoms. For these reasons, it is aimed to determine the effect of virtual reality on pre-surgical anxiety in this study.The hypothesis of the study is that watching videos with virtual glasses will reduce preoperative anxiety.
The aim of this study is to gather empirical evidence which will enable to evaluate the impact of probiotic supplementation on the severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms, function, and composition of gut microbiota, metabolic parameters, inflammation, and oxidative stress markers in patients with diagnosed depressive disorders. The designed study will be prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-blind. The intervention period will last 8 weeks for each patient. The study will be conducted on 100 patients in total, who will be randomly divided into two groups, consisting of 50 patients each. Patients included in Group I (PRO-D) will receive one capsule daily containing a probiotic mixture at a daily dose of 3×109 colony-forming units (CFU). The probiotic will be composed of two bacteria strains: Lactobacillus helveticus Rosell®-52, Bifidobacterium longum Rosell®-175, and excipients: potato starch, magnesium stearate, and the capsule shell, made of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose. Patients included in Group II (PLC-D) will receive daily the same capsule, containing only excipients: potato starch, maltodextrin, and the capsule shell. The color, smell, and taste of the placebo will not be different from those included in the probiotic capsule. Patients will be considered compliant if they consume >= 80% of the supplements. The primary outcome measures will be the severity of depressive anxiety and stress symptoms assessed with Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale (DASS) with subscales scores, the quality of life level assessed with the WHOQOL-BREF instrument. The secondary outcomes measures will include: blood pressure (BP), body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) measures, fasting glucose (fGlc), HDL cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG), white blood cells count (WBC), neutrofiles, serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), the level of faecal SCFAs, faecal microbiota α-diversity and the level of oxidative stress parameters (total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and malondialdehyde (MDA)) in the blood serum.
Timely interventions may reduce the occurrence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in ICU medical staff. Existing research suggests that either self-learning psychological relief methods or seeking online counseling or therapy from professional psychotherapists during the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron outbreak has the potential to alleviate the emotional distress and promote the physical and mental health of health care workers. Web-based online mental health interventions complemented by joint effective mental health advice can further reduce harmful negative effects.
The study was planned as a randomized controlled study in order to evaluate the use of music and natural scenery paintings in women who underwent HSG procedure, their pain level, anxiety and post-procedure analgesic use.
Suicide is a major public health problem. About 9,000 suicides per year are retrieved by year in France. Between 15,000 and 20,0000 suicide attempts give rise to contact with the healthcare system. Among young people aged 15 to 24 years old, suicide is the second main cause of death. In this way, suicide among adolescents is a major public health priority, due to its seriousness, its frequency, and its potentially preventable nature. The severity of suicide risk can be assessed by different scales, and the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is the most widely used in the international literature for adolescents, assessing four dimensions: suicidal ideation, severity of ideation, suicidal behavior and lethality. The measurement of the seriousness of the suicide risk is therefore defined as the measurement of the importance of the direct and indirect negative consequences associated with this risk. It can be catch up in the four factors mentioned above. Anxiety is one of the central pillars influencing the suicidal risk of adolescents. Very few studies have identified operationalizable and generalizable risk factors for anxiety. However, in adolescents, one of the risk factors for anxiety seems particularly important, because it is a factor that is both generic (i.e., it can be found in different profiles of adolescents), related to the projection in the future (which characterizes this population), and relatively specific to this age group, while being operational through validated questionnaires. This important risk factor is the eco-anxiety, which corresponds to anxiety related to climate change. The theme of climate change is certainly a central social issue, but also an important public health issue. First, climate change raises direct risks to human health, and indirectly some risks for mental health. For instance, the direct consequences of a drought or natural disaster can cause material hardship that impacts indirectly mental health (Thoma et al., 2021). Secondly, climate change can also raise direct risk for mental health, and especially the eco-anxiety which is not the consequence of a direct risk from the environment on an individual, but rather constitutes mental distress related to the fear of such changes. Eco-anxiety can be identified and measured in a valid and reliable way thanks to a scale used in the international literature, the "Climate Anxiety Scale" (CAS), which was validated in 2020 with 22 items with 4 factors by Clayton and Karazsia (Clayton and Karazsia, 2020), and translated and validated in French in 2022 by Mouguiama-Daouda (Mouguiama-Daouda et al., 2022), retaining as the most appropriate model the version with the first 13 items. This scale is suitable for adolescents from the age of 12 years old. This 13-item scale is composed of two subscales that assess cognitive and emotional difficulties in response to climate change and functional impairment. Two subscales are added to this 13-item scale (and thus are part of the 22-item CAS also validated), which assess 1) direct or indirect personal experience of climate change, and 2) behavioral commitment and the tendency to deploy adaptive behavioral responses to climate change. The literature reports a correlation between eco-anxiety and depression (Mouguiama-Daouda et al., 2022). Indeed, depressive symptoms can influence how people worry about climate change. The correlation between eco-anxiety and anxiety is variable in the literature and has been studied using questionnaires focusing on generalized anxiety (Mouguiama-Daouda et al., 2022). Higher suicide rates have certainly been shown in populations affected by climate change (Dumont et al., 2020), related to the direct consequences of climate change, e.g., due to pollution, increased temperature or drought. However, to the knowledge of the investigators and despite the major public health impact in adolescents, no study has investigated the relationships between eco-anxiety and the severity of suicide risk. This study therefore seeks to examine the association between eco-anxiety in adolescents, assessed using the French version of the CAS, and the severity of suicide risk, assessed using the French version of the C-SSRS. We hypothesize that there would be a relationship between eco-anxiety and the severity of suicide risk in adolescents. Such results would allow both to refine the understanding of the risk of suicide, in its relationship with a central theme of society and public health, and to better identify and prevent behaviors at risk of suicide among adolescents.
Recruitment target: Phase I: Co-design of intervention: 5 to 15 CYP aged between 12-18 years of age referred to the pan-London long COVID MDT. Phase II: Randomised pilot: 40 patients (12-18 years) will be recruited from a potential pool of 214 patients referred to the pan-London long COVID MDT. Methods: Phase I: Co-design Design and setting The intervention will be co-designed with CYP following a process informed by practice-base evidence, which centres the voices and wisdom of CYP, focuses on creativity and playfulness, and systemic and narrative approaches. The process will involve: 1) Refining the intentions of key stakeholders (including ways of bringing psychological and physiological principles into the intervention); 2) Participation of CYP; 3) Creativity and playfulness and 4) Responding to feedback (see Salvo et al., 2022). Phase II. Pilot Population: 40 patients (12-18 years) will be recruited from a potential pool of 214 patients referred to the pan-London long COVID MDT. CYP will be randomised to receive either standard treatment or standard treatment plus intervention. Study Treatment Standard treatment consists of virtual MDT discussion with referrer and advice signposting into local services for specific issues. They are sent leaflets and information. If a patient is severely affected enough to be seen face to face, they are offered an interdisciplinary consultation, and tailored input from therapies and psychological services. Access to bite size videos and leaflets covering the following topics: sleep, pacing, activity management, school reintegration, managing friendships, eating well and emotional wellbeing. Young people are invited to a single virtual group Q&A session to bring any queries after watching the videos. The leaflets and online sessions have been developed by professionals from the Evelina, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Imperial, University College London Hospital, and the Whittington. The bite size videos and live sessions are delivered by a clinical psychologist, a dietitian, specialist nurse, occupational therapist, and physiotherapist. More complex or severely affected patients will receive one to one treatment with members of the MDT as required. Intervention Based on clinical expertise and theory, it is anticipated the following elements may be included in the intervention.: - Progressive breathing pattern retraining, including education, self-observation, relaxation, body scanning, postural re-alignment - Identifying the connections between body and mind to address anxiety and breathlessness - Coping skills for managing anxiety using principles from narrative therapy and mindfulness - Online materials to improve self-efficacy with home practice - Social connection with other CYP for peer support, and resource sharing - Activities to help CYP reconnect with their usual activities, skills, abilities, interests, support systems
The goal of this clinical trial is to examine the effectiveness of the Stress Management and Resilience Training (SMART) in increasing resilience in a population of U.S. Air Force personnel at Joint Base Andrews, Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Nellis Air Force Base, and Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. When delivered in real-world conditions, to what extent does SMART increase levels of resiliency and decrease levels of stress in a sample of active component U.S. Air Force personnel? 2. Does SMART have a sustained effectiveness from baseline to 12, 24 and 36-weeks after training completion in a sample of active component U.S. Air Force personnel? 3. Does SMART provided via an in-person/video-teleconference (VTC) or Computer-Based Training (CBT) modality demonstrate equivalent effectiveness in increasing resilience and decreasing stress in active component Air Force personnel? Participants will be asked to complete a pre-intervention survey, complete the assigned modality of SMART ( in-person/VTC or CBT), and complete follow-up measurements at 12-, 24-, and 36-weeks post-intervention completion. Researchers will compare in-person/VTC and CBT groups' measurements to see if a difference in self-reported resilience, stress, anxiety, or quality of life is present pre-intervention. Researchers will compare in-person/VTC and CBT groups' measurements to see if a difference in self-reported resilience, stress, anxiety, or quality of life is present post-intervention.