Effect of the Biomarker Copeptin in Managing Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)

Acute Myocardial Infarction Clinical Trial

— BiC-8  

Official title:

The Effect of Integrating the Biomarker Copeptin Into the Process of Managing Patients With Suspected ACS

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01498731
• Other study ID #: Charite-BiC-8
• Secondary ID: DRKS00000276U111
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• First received: October 25, 2011
• Last updated: June 4, 2013
• Start date: April 2011
• Est. completion date: June 2013

Study information

• Verified date: June 2013
• Source: Charite University, Berlin, Germany
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Germany: Ministry of Health
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Acute chest pain is commonly known to be the classic symptom of acute myocardial infarction. Of the many patients which visit the Emergency Department because of chest pain, less than half do actually suffer from an acute myocardial infarction or acute myocardial ischemia. In some patients the acute myocardial infarction can be diagnosed at admission, either because of typical changes in their ECG (STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction)or because of increased levels of the laboratory value Troponin in their blood (NSTEMI, Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction). Troponin is currently the most important marker to diagnose acute myocardial infarction. Unfortunately a lot of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome do not show any ECG or Troponin changes. These patients pose a major problem in emergency medicine as they need to precautionally be admitted to a chest pain unit and to be started on medical treatment until a second Troponin test after 6-9 hours is available.

In this study, we investigate the biomarker Copeptin. Copeptin has shown excellent results in diagnostic clinical trials assessing its use in various acute diseases. There are three important trials showing an excellent negative predictive value of Copeptin in combination with Troponin in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (Reichlin et al., JACC, 2009; Keller et al. JACC, 2010, Giannitsis et al. Clin Chem 2011).

This trial compares two processes of managing patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the standard process according to current guidelines and the experimental process integrating copeptin as a rule-out marker for acute myocardial infarction into management decisions. Main Hypothesis: Patients with suspected ACS who test negative for Troponin and negative for Copeptin at their initial presentation to the ED can safely be discharged (interventional process). They will not experience more major cardiac adverse events than patients who were managed by standard practise (control process)within 30 days after admission.

The Investigators want to test Copeptin in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome in whom the ECG is unspecific and the initial Troponin test is negative. Further patient care will be based on the Copeptin result. Patients with a negative Copeptin will be discharged into the ambulant care of resident cardiologists.Copeptin positive patients will be managed according to standard guidelines for the management of patients with ACS.

Description:

The management of patients with suspected Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) can be time-consuming and expensive. Often patients need to be hospitalized for precautionary medical treatment and serial Troponin testing until further decisions can be made.

Copeptin, a 39 amino acid glycopeptide, is the C-terminal portion of Pro-Vasopressin. It is co-secreted from the posterior pituitary gland together with Vasopressin and mirrors the amount of Vasopressin in the circulation. Vasopressin is primarily known as Anti-Diuretic Hormone (ADH), which acts in the kidney to regulate the body's retention of water and in high concentration causes arterial vasoconstriction.

Vasopressin is, as a central hormone, also a crucial part of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis, which responds to severe, life-threatening "stress inputs"; its levels reflect the body's individual stress level.Vasopressin itself has a half-life of 5-10 minutes and is therefore difficult to measure in-vivo. Copeptin is secreted stoichiometrically with Vasopressin, it remains stable for days after blood withdrawal and can therefore easily be measured. Copeptin has been studied as a diagnostic and prognostic marker since 2006. In acute myocardial infarction Copeptin levels have been shown to increase early after the onset of symptoms (0-4 hours) and start decreasing after 4-5 hours.

In acute myocardial infarction (AMI) Copeptin levels increase early after the onset of symptoms. In patients with suspected ACS Copeptin levels were significantly higher in patients with AMI than in patients with other diagnoses. Copeptin in conjunction with Troponin T was particularly useful as a rule-out marker of AMI.

This is a randomized controlled diagnostic trial to quantify the benefit of integrating Copeptin into the management process of patients with NSTEACS and a negative baseline Troponin I test result in the Chest Pain Unit (CPU). Patient management will depend on Copeptin rather than serial Troponin results. Patients will be randomized in either a standard group (management according to current guidelines on managing patients with ACS, Copeptin will be tested, but result will not be revealed to treating personnel) or an interventional group (Copeptin testing, further management dependent on Copeptin result).

In this interventional group, patients with a negative baseline Copeptin will be discharged into the ambulant care of co-operating resident cardiologists. Patients with a positive Copeptin result will be treated as by standard care (like patients in the control group).

The investigators will assess the efficacy and safety of the new process as compared to the standard process. Secondary endpoints will assess patient satisfaction and length of hospital stay. This study design will not only assess the diagnostic use but also the clinical relevance of Copeptin testing in the ED/CPU.

Consecutive N-STEACS patients of the Chest Pain Unit with a negative Troponin I at admission will be invited to participate. Troponin I is tested as part of the standard management of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome on a point of care test device (POCT).

Patients who give their written informed consent will then be randomized into one of two study arms (experimental and standard management) where further management depends on their Copeptin result at admission.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 902
• Est. completion date: June 2013
• Est. primary completion date: June 2013
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Typical chest pain (with or without ECG-changes, but no ST-elevation)suggestive of unstable angina or non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)

• Troponin negative at admission according to the current clinical practice Patient willing and able to give written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)

• Continuing chest pain or recurrent episodes of chest pain under therapy

• High-risk patients with suspected ACS who need to be hospitalized for reasons independent of their initial troponin result

• Patients who need to be hospitalized for other medical reasons

• Patients in need of urgent life-saving interventions

• Patients under 18 years of age

• Patients with a life expectancy < 6 months

• Patients with any condition that leads the treating physician to not consider the patient eligible for the trial

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Diagnostic

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Acute Coronary Syndrome
• Acute Myocardial Infarction
• Infarction
• Myocardial Infarction

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Discharge home
Patients who test negative for Copeptin at admission will be considered low-risk and will be discharged home. To secure the patients safety they will be transferred into our co-operating network of resident cardiologists preferably the next day (but latest within the next three days). In case of any findings suggestive of acute coronary syndrome or worsening of the patient's condition, the patient will immediately be re-admitted to our Emergency Room.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Austria	Wilhelminenspital Vienna	Vienna
Germany	Kerckhoff-Klinik GmbH	Bad Nauheim
Germany	Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin	Berlin
Germany	Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf	Hamburg
Germany	Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg	Heidelberg
Switzerland	University Hospital Basel	Basel

Sponsors (6)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Charite University, Berlin, Germany	Heidelberg University, Kerckhoff Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland, Wilhelminenspital Vienna

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

Austria,  Germany,  Switzerland, 

References & Publications (12)

Giannitsis E, Kehayova T, Vafaie M, Katus HA. Combined testing of high-sensitivity troponin T and copeptin on presentation at prespecified cutoffs improves rapid rule-out of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Clin Chem. 2011 Oct;57(10):1452-5. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.161265. Epub 2011 Aug 1. — View Citation

Itoi K, Jiang YQ, Iwasaki Y, Watson SJ. Regulatory mechanisms of corticotropin-releasing hormone and vasopressin gene expression in the hypothalamus. J Neuroendocrinol. 2004 Apr;16(4):348-55. Review. — View Citation

Katan M, Morgenthaler N, Widmer I, Puder JJ, König C, Müller B, Christ-Crain M. Copeptin, a stable peptide derived from the vasopressin precursor, correlates with the individual stress level. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2008 Jun;29(3):341-6. — View Citation

Keller T, Tzikas S, Zeller T, Czyz E, Lillpopp L, Ojeda FM, Roth A, Bickel C, Baldus S, Sinning CR, Wild PS, Lubos E, Peetz D, Kunde J, Hartmann O, Bergmann A, Post F, Lackner KJ, Genth-Zotz S, Nicaud V, Tiret L, Münzel TF, Blankenberg S. Copeptin improves early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 May 11;55(19):2096-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.029. — View Citation

Khan SQ, Dhillon OS, O'Brien RJ, Struck J, Quinn PA, Morgenthaler NG, Squire IB, Davies JE, Bergmann A, Ng LL. C-terminal provasopressin (copeptin) as a novel and prognostic marker in acute myocardial infarction: Leicester Acute Myocardial Infarction Peptide (LAMP) study. Circulation. 2007 Apr 24;115(16):2103-10. Epub 2007 Apr 9. — View Citation

Möckel M, Müller R, Vollert J, Müller C, Danne O, Gareis R, Störk T, Dietz R, Koenig W. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 for early risk stratification in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a multi-marker approach: the North Wuerttemberg and Berlin Infarction Study-II (NOBIS-II). Clin Res Cardiol. 2007 Sep;96(9):604-12. Epub 2007 Jun 27. — View Citation

Morgenthaler NG, Struck J, Alonso C, Bergmann A. Assay for the measurement of copeptin, a stable peptide derived from the precursor of vasopressin. Clin Chem. 2006 Jan;52(1):112-9. Epub 2005 Nov 3. — View Citation

Newby LK, Storrow AB, Gibler WB, Garvey JL, Tucker JF, Kaplan AL, Schreiber DH, Tuttle RH, McNulty SE, Ohman EM. Bedside multimarker testing for risk stratification in chest pain units: The chest pain evaluation by creatine kinase-MB, myoglobin, and troponin I (CHECKMATE) study. Circulation. 2001 Apr 10;103(14):1832-7. — View Citation

Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R, Woolard RH, Feldman JA, Beshansky JR, Griffith JL, Selker HP. Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med. 2000 Apr 20;342(16):1163-70. — View Citation

Reichlin T, Hochholzer W, Stelzig C, Laule K, Freidank H, Morgenthaler NG, Bergmann A, Potocki M, Noveanu M, Breidthardt T, Christ A, Boldanova T, Merki R, Schaub N, Bingisser R, Christ M, Mueller C. Incremental value of copeptin for rapid rule out of acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jun 30;54(1):60-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.076. — View Citation

Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD; Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2007 Oct;28(20):2525-38. — View Citation

Voors AA, von Haehling S, Anker SD, Hillege HL, Struck J, Hartmann O, Bergmann A, Squire I, van Veldhuisen DJ, Dickstein K; OPTIMAAL Investigators. C-terminal provasopressin (copeptin) is a strong prognostic marker in patients with heart failure after an acute myocardial infarction: results from the OPTIMAAL study. Eur Heart J. 2009 May;30(10):1187-94. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp098. Epub 2009 Apr 3. — View Citation

* Note: There are 12 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 30 days Copeptin vs. Control arm.	Rate of MACE (all- cause death or survived sudden cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, re-hospitalisation for acute coronary syndrome, acute unplanned PCI, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and documented life-threatening arrhythmias (VF, VT, AV-block III)) within 30 days Copeptin vs. Control arm (non-inferiority).	30 days after discharge	Yes
Secondary	Proportion of patients in whom coronary angiography (CA) is performed Copeptin vs. Control arm.	Efficacy endpoint; Rate of Patients in whom CA is performed; Rate of Patients with PCI after Index CA; Rate of Patients with CABG after Index CA	within 30 days after discharge	No
Secondary	Rate of ALL major adverse cardiac events (MACE)	Rate of ALL MACE at 90 days; all- cause death or survived sudden cardiac arrest; myocardial infarction; re-hospitalisation for acute coronary syndrome; acute unplanned PCI; coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); documented life-threatening arrhythmias (VF, VT, AV-block III)	90 days after discharge	Yes
Secondary	Patient satisfaction regarding management within the ED/CPU	Patient satisfaction regarding management before discharge from ED/CPU	no specific time frame, before discharge	No
Secondary	Length of hospital stay	Duration of hospital stay; Length of stay at the Emergency Room; Length of hospital stay in the CPU; Length of stay in an intensive care unit (ICU); Total length of hospital stay in hours including time as an inpatient on other wards	within 30 days after discharge	No