Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Active, not recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05188417 |
Other study ID # |
GPTF0201 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Active, not recruiting |
Phase |
Phase 2
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
December 9, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
June 30, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
February 2023 |
Source |
GrandPharma (China) Co., Ltd. |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
evaluating the safety and efficacy of tirofiban in combination with intravenous thrombolytic
therapy with alteplase in acute ischemic stroke
Description:
Ischemic stroke is a common disease of nervous system, with high morbidity, mortality and
disability, which seriously threatens human health. According to the latest global burden of
disease research, the overall lifetime risk of stroke in China is 39.9%, ranking first in the
world, which means that about two out of every five people will suffer a stroke in their
lifetime. In addition, stroke is also the first cause of life lost due to disease in China.
Intravenous thrombolysis is one of the most effective treatment methods for AIS at present,
and the commonly used thrombolytic drug is recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA).
Although the recanalization rate of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase can reach about
50%, in actual treatment, about 1/3 of patients experience reocclusion after thrombolytic
therapy, resulting in neurological deterioration.
Tirofiban is a highly effective and reversible non-peptide platelet surface glycoprotein (GP)
IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, which can competitively inhibit the binding of fibrinogen and
platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor, inhibit platelet aggregation, prolong bleeding time, and
inhibit thrombosis. Tirofiban can inhibit platelet aggregation within 5 min after intravenous
injection, with the time to peak of < 30 min, and achieve stable plasma concentration within
1 hour. Due to the short half-life (1.4-1.8 h), continuous administration is required, and
platelet aggregation is restored in approximately 50% of patients 4 h after discontinuation.
Therefore, tirofiban has the characteristics of rapid antiplatelet aggregation and rapid
recovery of platelet function after discontinuation, and does not significantly increase the
risk of bleeding events while preventing thrombosis.
For AIS patients whose onset time is within the thrombolytic time window, the results of
preliminary research showed that tirofiban hydrochloride injection combined with intravenous
thrombolytic therapy can reduce the volume of intracranial lesions in patients, better
improve the symptoms of neurological deficits in patients than intravenous thrombolytic
therapy alone, and the long-term neurological outcomes of patients with combined therapy are
better than those with intravenous thrombolytic therapy alone. Observation of the efficacy of
tirofiban at different time points after intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase in AIS
showed that tirofiban 2-12 hours after intravenous thrombolysis had the greatest benefit in
improving neural function.
With the accumulation of clinical experience in the treatment of ischemic cerebrovascular
diseases and the development and popularization of interventional therapy, some shortcomings
of oral antiplatelet drugs in the treatment of reocclusion have been found, such as
insufficient antithrombotic strength, slow onset time, differences in patients'
individuality, poor patient compliance and other problems. In addition, due to safety
considerations, current guidelines at home and abroad do not recommend the administration of
antiplatelet therapy within 24 hours after intravenous thrombolysis, which limits the
therapeutic effect of AIS to some extent. Based on the pathophysiological mechanism of
reocclusion and referring to the application experience of tirofiban in the cardiovascular
field, many experts at home and abroad have carried out a series of clinical researches on
the early application of tirofiban after intravenous thrombolytic and/or endovascular therapy
to improve the recanalization rate and reduce reocclusion, showing good safety and efficacy,
which has been affirmed by a number of diagnosis and treatment guidelines. However, although
a large number of clinical experience and various clinical researches have proved the safety
and efficacy of tirofiban's antiplatelet effect in different AIS treatments, there has been
no large-sample randomized controlled clinical trial to verify its clinical efficacy in AIS.
This is a Phase 2 clinical study, and the subjects are patients with acute ischemic stroke
who have received intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase within 4.5 hours of onset. The
study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of different doses of tirofiban hydrochloride
sodium chloride injection compared with placebo in patients with acute ischemic stroke after
intravenous thrombolytic therapy with alteplase.
Subjects who meet the inclusion criteria but do not meet the exclusion criteria are randomly
divided into three groups: two groups with different doses of tirofiban hydrochloride sodium
chloride injection and one placebo-controlled group, respectively, namely: Group 1 (tirofiban
hydrochloride sodium chloride injection group at 0.25 μg/kg/min (0.005 ml/kg/min)); Group 2
(tirofiban hydrochloride sodium chloride injection group at 0.4 μg/kg/min (0.008 ml/kg/min));
and Group 3 (placebo 0.9% sodium chloride injection).
It should be ensured that subjects are given tirofiban or placebo within 12 hours after the
end of thrombolysis. The patients are observed immediately after the end of administration, 4
hours after the end of administration, 48 hours, 7 days, and 14 days after the start of
administration, and followed up to 90 days after the start of administration. The study
endpoints include: the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours after
the start of administration (primary safety index), the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage
within 48 hours after the start of administration (secondary safety index), etc., the
proportion of subjects with mRS 0-1 score on the modified Rankin scale 90 days after the
start of administration (primary efficacy index), and the value of change in NIHSS score from
baseline at 48 hours, 7 and 14 days after the start of administration (secondary efficacy
index), etc. The safety and efficacy of different doses of tirofiban hydrochloride sodium
chloride injection compared with placebo in patients with acute ischemic stroke after
intravenous thrombolytic therapy with alteplase are evaluated by statistical analysis of
endpoint indexes.