Wounds and Injuries Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison of Honey and Povidone-iodine in Wound Healing on Acute Laceration Wounds: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study
This study evaluates healing time in usage of honey and povidone-iodine over paraffin gauze
as dressings in the treatment of acute laceration wounds. In Indonesia, especially in rural
area, where most of the resources is limited and modern dressings are expensive and
hard-to-find. The investigators tried to find an alternative which was easier to find and
could act as a substitute of modern wound dressing.
The hypothesis of this study is honey and povidone-iodine could be a good substitute (or
equal to) to paraffin gauze on acute laceration wounds.
Honey is chosen because of its versatility and already well-known to be used as a chronic
wound dressing. Povidone-iodine was chosen as another alternative because it is still one of
the most used substance in rural area as a wound dressing, but there is not enough study to
support the usage of this substance. Paraffin gauze was chosen as a representative of modern
wound dressing because it fulfilled the standard of wound dressing on acute wound, which is
non-adherent and also moist.
The investigator's team consists of five members, each have their own specific tasks and
divided by two groups, which are ER group (first time encounter, informed consent, and
intervention) and polyclinic group (routine wound care). All of the data are primary data.
Data registry were taken by the team without involving any other party. Any intervention done
to the participants were also done only by the team(suturing, wound care). Appointment for
routine wound care was also made by contacting the participant through their cellphone
numbers which were collected when they come to the ER.
The data of each of the participant was registered on a form which was pre-made by the
investigators. It recorded the identity of the patient, history taking, physical examination,
and also to record more detailed information about our intervention, such as the amount of
stitches and how many and what kind of resources that have been spent on the participant.
Every sample will be categorized into 3 randomized groups of intervention; honey,
povidone-iodine, and paraffin gauze, which will also be categorized by location of their
wound; face and neck, upper extremity, and lower extremity. Participants on each intervention
group are distributed evenly using stratified block randomization. Photos of the wound will
be taken before and after the wound is cleaned, and after the wound has been sutured. Every
patient will be asked to attend a predetermined schedule for wound care assessment. The wound
will be evaluated by photos before and after the wound is cleaned, debrided, or have its
sutures removed. Parameter of evaluation will be duration of wound healing per anatomical
region, infection, cleanliness of wound, odor, exudate level, pain, itch, and total cost of
wound care.
Every paper consists of participants' data that were collected on colored maps based on the
intervention group (red: povidone-iodine, yellow: honey, blue: paraffin). At the end of the
study, three of the team's members converted the data to be analyzed using Microsoft Excel
and SPSS.
The investigators prepared beforehand the Standard Operational Procedures regarding any
possibilities of adverse events, such as lidocaine toxicity and honey hypersensitivity and
were already approved by the hospital's committee.
The investigators determined the target of the sample size with the total sample of 36
participants, distributed evenly based on intervention groups and wounds' location using
stratified block randomization
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04554212 -
Blood Flow Restriction Training After Patellar INStability
|
N/A | |
Suspended |
NCT02932176 -
Machine Learning for Handheld Vascular Studies
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04803253 -
Study of the Social and Professional Reintegration Improvements Using a Set of Solutions for Upper Limb Amputation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00116337 -
Spinal Cord Stimulation to Restore Cough
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03463720 -
Outcome for Patients With War-Associated Extremity Wound Infection
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03113253 -
TRANexamic Acid to Reduce Bleeding in BURN Surgery
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05492903 -
COMmunity of Practice And Safety Support for Navigating Pain (COMPASS-NP)
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02909231 -
One-year Patient Reported Outcomes Following Hospitalization for Trauma
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02432456 -
Ketamine Infusion Therapy for the Management of Acute Pain in Adult Rib Fracture Patients
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02744144 -
Wound Bacterial Microbiota and Their Antibiotic Resistance
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02266771 -
Impact of V.A.C. Veraflo Therapy in Wounds Requiring Debridement Within an Orthopedic Practice
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02394821 -
Odor Management in Fungating Wounds Comparing Metronidazole and Polihexanide
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT01665963 -
Efficacy of TopClosure(C)System in Healing Complicated Pacemaker Wounds
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00151112 -
Comparison of Two Different Procedures for Plexus Anesthesia
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03872544 -
Short Term Status of Free Dermal Fat Autografts for Complex Craniofacial Wounds
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04596124 -
Effectiveness and Tolerability of Fitostimoline Plus Cream and Gauze vs Connettivina Bio Plus Cream and Gauze
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05800834 -
Benefits of Morphine Gel for Pain Reduction in Patients With Cancer Wounds
|
Phase 2 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT03880188 -
Long Term Status of Free Dermal Fat Autografts for Complex Craniofacial Wounds
|
||
Terminated |
NCT04775316 -
Prospective, International, Multicenter, Observational Study to Evaluate the Clinical Performance and Safety of a Silicone-coated Transparent Postoperative Dressing
|
||
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT03312504 -
Implementing a School Prevention Program to Reduce Injuries Through Neuromuscular Training
|
N/A |