View clinical trials related to Wound Complications.
Filter by:A randomized controlled trial to determine whether changing of gloves by the surgical team during cesarean section may decrease post-operative infectious morbidity and wound complications
That study have the primary purpose identify if exist difference to the healing and quality of life between women that use of a surgical support bra, common support bra and without support bra after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. To do this, will be assessed pain, healing of the wound (dehiscence, infection) and quality of life life through specific instruments.
The investigators aim to show that single use negative pressure dressings can decrease the rate of wound complications in obese women (BMI > 40 kg/m2) undergoing cesarean delivery at a tertiary medical center by randomizing women to receive either a single use negative pressure dressing or the standard dressing after cesarean delivery.
Advances in surgical techniques and immunosuppression (IS) have led to an appreciable reduction in postoperative complications following kidney transplantation. However, surgical site events (SSE) including surgical site infections (SSI) and other wound complications are still very common and they can limit these improved outcomes and result in prolonged hospitalization, hospital readmission and reoperation, consequently increasing overall transplant cost. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a concept introduced initially to assist in the treatment of chronic open wounds. This technique uses a negative pressure unit and specific dressings that help to hold the incision edges together, redistribute lateral tension, reduce edema, stimulate perfusion and protect the surgical site from external infectious sources. Thus, it provides faster wound healing and shortens hospital stay. Recently, there has been growing interest in using portable NPWT devices on closed incisions after surgery to prevent potential SSI and other wound complications in high-risk patients. Investigations regarding this technique in various surgical settings have shown that it can reduce the risk of SSI and other wound complications. These studies concluded that any patient undergoing transplantation should be considered as 'high-risk' and should receive this treatment. To date, no studies are reported in literature exploring the effects of preventive use of portable NPWT devices on surgical wounds in the setting of organ transplantation. The aim of our study is to compare a portable NPWT device (PICO, Smith & Nephew, London UK) to conventional gauze dressings in patients undergoing kidney transplantation (KT) surgery.
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of a negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) system after revision total knee and hip arthroplasty in patients at high risk for infection. It is hypothesized that the use of NPWT system (i.e., Prevena) in high risk patients prevents wound complications and decreases reoperation rates.
Approximately 500,000 surgical site infections occur annually in the US. These lead to worse patient quality of life, more outpatient and emergency room visits, readmissions and home services, with an estimated increase in costs of at least $3500 per complication. Surgical site infections are associated with increasing body mass index. There is limited and conflicting data of the utility of multiple surgical interventions to decrease the risk of surgical site complications. The investigators explored the effect of a prospective care pathway for closure of vertical abdominal wounds on patient's wound complications.
This study is aimed at determining whether or not the use of a wound suction device placed on the cesarean incision instead of a standard sterile dressing will decrease the prevalence of wound complications and wound infections in women at high risk for post operative complications. The study will first look at the infection and wound complication rate in women 6 months prior to the start date of the study by reviewing charts of women who have undergone a cesarean section. The study involves placing a single use, portable wound vacuum over the cesarean section incision and keeping it in place for 72h. The investigators will then compare the rates of wound infection and wound complications between these two groups. It is our hypothesis that negative pressure wound systems will decrease the wound infection and complication rate in this high risk population.
To determine whether the rate of wound complications differs based on method of closure of skin incision (staples vs. suture) after cesarean delivery.
Whenever a person has a cesarean section there is a risk that there will be a problem with healing of the wound. The most common type of wound healing problem is separation and opening of the skin and fatty tissue just beneath the skin. This type of wound healing problem happens more often when the patient has a high body weight. In most cases, metal staples are used to bring the skin together to close the wound. Usually, the staples are left in place for a longer time when the woman is heavy, in hopes of decreasing the chance of wound healing problems. But it is not known if leaving the staples in for a longer time is actually helpful. In some cases, leaving the staples in longer may cause more pain and will require you to see the doctor again to get the staples taken out. The purpose of this study is to see if there is any difference in how the wound heals in heavy women after cesarean section when the skin staples are removed after a short period of time versus a long period of time.