View clinical trials related to Visceral Pain.
Filter by:Objective: To evaluate the overall efficacy of rTMS in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome and to explore the central mechanism of rTMS for IBS. Methods: 1. Clinical efficacy evaluation of TMS for chronic visceral pain in IBS patients The 200 IBS patients who meet the recruitment criteria for the clinical study will be randomized into 100 patients in rTMS and Western medicine group. Corresponding treatment was given for 1 week, rTMS group received 1 Hz/s, 20 min for 1 week; Western medicine group received pivinonium tablets orally, 50 mg three times a day for 1 week. Clinical assessment included symptoms, stool traits, mood, and sleep. 2. Study on the central mechanism of using fMRI to treat chronic visceral pain in IBS patients Forty cases each were included in the IBS-eligible patient group and the healthy control group, and repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment was given to the patient group for 1 week, and the patient group underwent the assessment of clinical observational indexes (IBS-SSS, SAS, SDS, and AIS) before and after the treatment and the acquisition of functional magnetic resonance data. In the healthy control group, clinical observation indexes (SAS, SDS, AIS) were evaluated before enrollment, and functional magnetic resonance data were collected after enrollment. Conclusion: 1. The clinical efficacy of rTMS for IBS is superior to that of the western drug pivoxyl bromide tablets. 2. Targeted brain areas of rTMS treatment: there was a positive correlation between the change in ALFF values of mPFC and the improvement in abdominal pain level score before and after treatment.
Patients with digestive tract malignancy often experience severe and unremitting abdominal pain that negatively affects physical, emotional, and social function, as well as health related quality of life (HRQOL). Therapeutic virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a promising and evidence-based treatment modality for cancer pain. Users of VR wear a pair of goggles with a close-proximity screen in front of the eyes that creates a sensation of being transported into lifelike, three-dimensional worlds. To date, VR has been limited to short-term clinical trials for cancer pain. Moreover, limited research exists on theory-based VR modalities beyond mere distraction, such as VR that employs acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) with components of biofeedback and mindfulness. To bridge these gaps, this study seeks to: (1) assess the impact of immersive VR on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including pain, activity metrics, and opioid use among patients with visceral pain from a digestive tract malignancy; (2) assess differences in PROs, activity metrics, and opioid use between skills-based VR therapy vs. distraction VR therapy; and (3) determine patient-level predictors of VR treatment response in visceral cancer pain. To address these aims, the study will measure PROs and opioid use in 360 patients randomized among 3 groups and follow them for 60 days after enrollment: (1) an enhanced VR group receiving skills-based VR; (2) a distraction-based VR group receiving patient-selected VR videos; and (3) a VR sham control group using a VR headset with 2-D content. The results will inform best practices for the implementation of VR for visceral cancer pain management and guide selection of patient-tailored experiences.
To validate the efficacy of miniaturized ultrasound needle transducer as the primary guide for thoracic regional anesthesia.
This study will evaluate the benefit of lidocaine perfusion in cancer related visceral pain resistant to morphinics. It is an efficacy study in adults and children and a randomized prospective study.