View clinical trials related to Vibration; Exposure.
Filter by:Parallel-group, single-blinded controlled clinical trial. The study involved stroke patients (no more than 3 points on a scale Rankin) dived of the control group and experimental group. Control group received daily sessions of conventional physical therapy. In addition to the same conventional physical therapy treatment, the participants of the experimental group underwent repetitive upper limb Functional Proprioceptive Stimulations (FPS) sessions.
The present study aimed to investigate and compare the acute effect of local vibration (63 Hz vs 42 Hz frequencies) on the biceps brachii muscles on the elbow joint position sense (JPS) in healthy young men. Forty-five healthy young men aged 19 to 30 years were enrolled in the study. The participants were randomly assigned to receive either 63 Hz (n=15) or 42 Hz (n=15) or sham vibration (control group) (n=15). Participants in the experimental group received five bouts of 1-minute of each vibration exposure localized to the biceps brachii muscle, with a 1-minute rest between the bouts. Active elbow joint position error (in degrees) was selected as an outcome measure to assess elbow JPS. To measure active elbow joint position error, the subject was made to sit on the chair with eyes closed and shoulders in 0 degree of abduction and elbows fully extended. The examiner passively moved the elbow to 90 degrees of flexion (target position) and maintained it for 10 seconds. The subject was requested to memorize the target position. The subject was asked to actively flex the elbow to the target position from the initial starting position (elbow fully extended) and hold it for 5 seconds. Three trials were conducted, with a 30-second rest given between each trial. The target and reproduced angles in each trial were measured using a standard plastic goniometer. The difference between the target and reproduced angles in each trial was calculated to determine active elbow joint position error. Measurements were taken at baseline and immediately after the vibration protocol.
Whole body vibration (WBV) is a therapeutic modality in the form of exercise on a vibrating platform with an amplitude of 2-4 mm at a frequency of 25-50 Hz, which is used with increased popularity in sports medicine and rehabilitation due to its beneficial effects on muscle strength, balance, postural control, bone formation, and circulation. Beneficial effects on muscle strength and athletic performance have been reported. Spinal reflexes explain these beneficial neuromuscular effects. However, the neuronal circuit and receptors of the reflex response have not been defined precisely. A group of researchers propose that the reflex system underlying the neuromuscular effects of WBV is the Tonic vibration reflex (TVR), whose receptor is the muscle spindle; other researchers claim that the reflex latency induced by WBV is 4-5 ms longer than the TVR latency, so it is a bone myoregulation reflex whose receptor is osteocytes. The muscle spindle has sympathetic innervation. It has been reported that in case of increased sympathetic activity, muscle spindle sensitivity may increase and short-latency stretch reflex may be facilitated. The variation of muscle spindle activity with sympathetic activity may provide an opportunity to define the nature of the reflex response during WBV. Muscle spindles are more sensitive to vibrations around 100 Hz. This study has two hypotheses: According to the first hypothesis, WBV activates muscle spindles and the reflex latency induced by WBV is the same as TVR latency, and the latency does not change with increased sympathetic activity. According to the alternative hypothesis, WBV activates osteocytes, and WBV-induced reflex latency is longer than TVR latency. With increased sympathetic activity, the WBV reflex becomes dominant and the WBV-induced reflex latency becomes shorter. The aim of this research is to determine which of these two hypotheses is valid.
Whole-body vibration (WBV) has beneficial neuromuscular effects on muscle strength increase. Supraspinal, spinal, and peripheral mechanisms have been proposed to explain these beneficial effects. The most commonly proposed explanatory mechanism is spinal segmental reflexes. However, the neuronal circuit and receptors of the reflex response have not been defined precisely. A group of researchers found that the reflex system is the Tonic vibration reflex (TVR) under the neuromuscular effects of WBV; Other researchers claim that WBV activates a different spinal reflex than TVR. Tonic vibration reflex is a polysynaptic reflex that occurs as a result of muscle spindle activation, in which more than 100 Hz vibrations are applied to the belly or tendon of the muscle. A group of researchers argues that WBV activates the spinal reflex response, but this reflex response is different from TVR. According to them, WBV-induced reflex (WBV-IR) response latency is longer than TVR latency. WBV activates TVR at very attenuated amplitude; WBV activates a different spinal reflex with longer latency at medium and high amplitude vibration. They reported that although the H-reflex, T-reflex, and TVR latency was longer in the spastic soleus muscle than normotonic soleus muscle, where the muscle spindle and Ia afferent pathway were hyperactive. However, the WBV-IR latency was similar in both spastic and normotonic soleus muscle. According to hypothesis of the present study , the reflex system activated by WBV changes depending on whether there is voluntary contraction or not: if the vibration is applied during voluntary contraction, the tonic vibration reflex is activated; In the absence of voluntary contraction (when the muscle is at rest), the bone myoregulation reflex is activated. The purpose of this research is to test this hypothesis.
Whole-body vibration (WBV) has beneficial neuromuscular effects on muscle strength increase. Supraspinal, spinal, and peripheral mechanisms have been proposed to explain these beneficial effects. The most commonly proposed explanatory mechanism is spinal segmental reflexes. However, the neuronal circuit and receptors of the reflex response have not been defined precisely. A group of researchers found that the reflex system is the Tonic vibration reflex (TVR) under the neuromuscular effects of WBV; Other researchers claim that WBV activates a different spinal reflex than TVR. Tonic vibration reflex is a polysynaptic reflex that occurs as a result of muscle spindle activation, in which more than 100 Hz vibrations are applied to the belly or tendon of the muscle. A group of researchers argues that WBV activates the spinal reflex response, but this reflex response is different from TVR. According to them, WBV-induced reflex (WBV-IR) response latency is longer than TVR latency. WBV activates TVR at very attenuated amplitude; WBV activates a different spinal reflex with longer latency at medium and high amplitude vibration. They reported that although the H-reflex, T-reflex, and TVR latency was longer in the spastic soleus muscle than normotonic soleus muscle, where the muscle spindle and Ia afferent pathway were hyperactive. However, the WBV-IR latency was similar in both spastic and normotonic soleus muscle. According to our hypothesis, the reflex system activated by WBV changes depending on vibration frequency: if the high-frequency (100-150 Hz) WBV is applied, the tonic vibration reflex is activated; if the low-frequency (30-40 Hz) WBV is applied, the bone myoregulation reflex is activated. The purpose of this research is to test this hypothesis.
Assessment of the dynamics of changes in physical, instrumental and laboratory parameters in patients with identified coronavirus infection complicated by acute respiratory failure included in the study in accordance with the inclusion criteria, and comparison of the results with the control group, study of the effect of modes when using vibroacoustic lung therapy.
The aim of the study was to examine the effect of six-week constant, low frequency and low amplitude Whole Body Vibration training on the strength and mechanical properties of the lower limb knee extensors and ankle joint dorsi flexor muscles.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of mechanical vibration on root resorption with or without the application of orthodontic force. Twenty patients who required maxillary premolar extractions as part of their orthodontic treatment were randomly separated into two groups of 10: no-force group and force group. Using a split-mouth procedure, each patient's maxillary first premolar teeth were randomly assigned as either vibration or control side in both groups. Buccally directed vibration of 113 Hz, using an Oral-B HummingBird device with a modified tip, was applied to the maxillary first premolar for 10 mins/day during 12 weeks. After the force application period, the maxillary first premolars were extracted and scanned with micro-computed tomography. Fiji(ImageJ) which made slice-by-slice quantitative volumetric measurements was used for resorption crater calculation. Total crater volumes was compared with Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney U tests.
In this study the effect of dental post application on postoperative dental pain in patients with asymptomatic teeth after a single-appointment root canal treatment will be evaluated.