View clinical trials related to Ventilator Associated Pneumonia.
Filter by:The French Society of Intensive Care conducts a comprehensive assessment of current antibiotic therapy practices in critically ill patients suspected of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP).
In low and middle-income countries, open endotracheal suction catheters are used multiple times to perform suctioning due to limited resources [1,2]. Currently, there is limited evidence for using a new suction catheter for each suction pass, acknowledged in a review article of endotracheal suction procedures in paediatric populations [3]. Additionally, the latest artificial airway suctioning practice guidelines published by the American Association for Respiratory Care in 2022 did not mention any recommendations regarding suction catheter changing frequency [4]. The guidelines adopted a study conducted in 2001 which showed that reusing an open tracheal suctioning catheter is safe and cost effective [5]. Therefore, the current evidence of reusing suctioning catheters remains unclear, which rationalize the reason why some resource limited Intensive Care Units (ICUs) use the catheter multiple times during a 12-hour shift, and possibly explain the high ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) incidence in these ICUs [1,2]. Therefore, this feasibility study will propose to explore whether single-used suction catheters or multiple used open endotracheal tracheal suctioning catheters flushed with chlorhexidine are associated with reduced VAP incidence and its impact on mechanically ventilated patients.
Artificial airways, such as endotracheal tubes and tracheostomies, in the pediatric and neonatal intensive care units (PICU, NICU respectively) are lifesaving for patients in respiratory failure, among other conditions. These devices are not without a risk of infection - ventilator-associated infections (VAIs), namely ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) and ventilator-associated tracheitis (VAT), are common. Treatment of suspected VAI accounts for nearly half of all Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) antibiotic use. VAI can represent a continuum from tracheal colonization, progression to tracheobronchial inflammation, and then pneumonia. Colonization of these airways is common and bacterial growth does not necessarily indicate a clinically significant infection. Tracheostomies, which are artificial airways meant for chronic use, are routinely exchanged on a semi-monthly to monthly basis, in part to disrupt bacterial biofilm formation that aids bacterial colonization and perhaps infection. When patients with tracheostomies are admitted for acute on chronic respiratory failure or a concern for an infection, these artificial airways are also routinely exchanged at some institutions. There however remains a critical need to understand how an artificial airway exchange alters the bacterial environment of these patients in sickness and in health. This research hypothesizes that exchanging an artificial airway will alter the microbiome of the artificial airway, by altering the microbial diversity and relative abundance of different bacterial species of the artificial airway. This study will involve the prospective collection of tracheal aspirates from patients with artificial airways. We will screen and enroll all patients admitted to a the NICU or PICU at Cohen Children's Medical Center (CCMC) who have tracheostomies and obtain tracheal aspirates within 72 hours before and after tracheostomy or endotracheal tube exchange. Tracheal aspirates are routinely obtained in the NICU and PICU from suctioning of an artificial airway and is a minimal risk activity. These samples will be brought to the Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research for 16 s ribosomal DNA (16srDNA) sequencing, which allows for accurate and sensitive detection of relative abundance and classification of bacterial flora. Tracheal aspirate sets will be analyzed against each other. Additionally, clinical and epidemiological data from the electronic medical record will be obtained. Antibiotic exposure will be accounted for via previously published means.
The Pneumonia Direct Pilot study is designed to assess whether combining molecular diagnostics for bacteria and AMR markers with host-response profiling improves agreement and predictive value for the diagnosis of VAP versus an adjudicated clinical reference standard. The feasibility design is intended to inform future interventional studies that will investigate the clinical impact of combined pathogen- and host-directed testing approaches.
Almost 90 out of 100 people carry herpes simplex viruses (HSV). Once a person has been infected with the herpes viruses, he or she can't get rid of them for the rest of her/his life. For the most part, the viruses are in a dormant state. Only when the immune system is weakened, for example in the case of a serious illness or stress, are the viruses reactivated. They then mainly cause cold sores, which are harmless for healthy people and usually heal without therapy. However, especially in people with a weakened immune system, HSV can also cause serious infections, such as meningitis. In almost every second mechanically ventilated patient in intensive care who has pneumonia, HSV can be detected in the respiratory tract. This is caused by reactivation of the viruses as a result of the severe underlying disease and stress during intensive care therapy. Whether treatment of the herpes viruses (e.g. with acyclovir) is necessary in this situation and helps the patients to cure has not been clarified, especially as acyclovir can also cause side effects such as a deterioration in kidney function. Currently, the physicians decide to treat the herpes viruses in about half of the patients. Several studies have shown that patients for whom the physician decided to treat the viruses survived more often. However, all of these studies looked at the course of the disease only retrospectively and thus are subject to many biases (including physician selection of who receives treatment, missing data). A definitive conclusion as to whether herpesvirus therapy can be recommended cannot be drawn without doubt from these studies. Therefore, the investigators would like to investigate in a randomized controlled trial, i.e. patients are randomly assigned to the experimental (therapy of herpesviruses) or control group (no therapy of herpesviruses), the effect of therapy with acyclovir on survival in mechanically ventilated intensive care patients with lower respiratory tract infection (pneumonia) in whom a large amount of HSV was found in the respiratory tract. The goal of the study is to provide clarity on whether therapy will help patients recover.
PROACT study aims to resolve uncertainties to influence actual practice guidelines or public health policing regarding VAP prevention in ICU by using probiotics administration. Multi-trauma patients with a head injury OR stroke or brain haemorrhage patients without any sign of aspiration and lung infection will be enrolled and randomized to either placebo or probiotic treatment to assess if VAP and mortality can be reduced in the interventional group.
The goal of this observational study is to investigate whether intravenous polymyxin B combined with nebulisation achieves better antimicrobial efficacy and clinical outcomes than intravenous use alone in patients with multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli infected with ventilator-associated pneumonia. The main questions it aims to answer are: - When using intravenous polymyxin B to treat patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria in clinical practice, is it necessary to assist with polymyxin B nebulization therapy？ - If necessary, how much dose of nebulization is better? Participants will be divided into two groups based on whether they have received nebulization treatment with polymyxin B in clinical practice. Blood and alveolar lavage fluid samples will be collected after the first dose injection and reaching the steady-state dose, and the drug concentration differences in blood and ELF will be measured in patients who have received intravenous injection of polymyxin B alone and those who have received adjuvant nebulization of polymyxin B, as well as differences in clinical outcomes and side effects. Researchers will compare the differences in blood and ELF drug concentrations, clinical outcomes, and incidence of side effects between two groups of patients, to see if is it necessary to assist with polymyxin B nebulization therapy in patients with multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli infected with ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Premature infants are susceptible to complications related to infrequent and non-standardized oral care. Although the benefits of frequent standardized oral care are known to reduce oral dysbiosis (increased level of potentially pathogenic bacteria) and its associated complications in critically ill adults leading to established evidence-based guidelines, no such information exists for VLBW infants. The proposed study will prospectively follow 168 VLBW infants for 4 weeks following birth.
The goal of this pragmatic cluster-randomized crossover trial is to test if less unnecessary antibiotics are prescribed when the lab reports respiratory culture test results in a specific way for patients who have respiratory cultures obtained, but do not meet clinical criteria for ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP). The main question it aims to answer is: Does a modified culture reporting intervention reduce unnecessary antibiotics for ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU)? Researchers will compare antibiotic use outcomes between eligible patients whose test results are communicated using the modified reporting and those with standard reporting of results.
The goal of this clinical trial is to propose a seamless intervention linking rapid bacterial isolate identification and antibiotic resistance gene detection and targeted antibiotic prescription to minimise time between infection onset and appropriate treatment in patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa or carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales infections. This is an investigator initiated trial. The primary hypothesis is that these interventions will lead to improved clinical outcomes amongst patients with hospital-acquired bloodstream infection, hospital-acquired pneumonia or ventilator-associated pneumonia due to carbapenem non-susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Enterobacterales, compared to standard antibiotic susceptibility testing. Patients will be randomised to either a control or intervention arm. Patients randomised to the intervention arm will have relevant specimens analysed by rapid microbiological diagnostics and will have early availability of ceftazidime-avibactam if appropriate. Patients randomised to the control arm, will have samples analysed by clinical microbiology laboratories using standard of care diagnostics. Antibiotics will be available to these patients as per usual institutional practice.