View clinical trials related to Ventilator Associated Pneumonia.
Filter by:• Background Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation is used during general anesthesia but can lead to serious complications. Respiratory parameter settings can be adjusted to minimize the detrimental effects of this unphysiological artificial respiration. Determining optimal ventilator settings is a multifactorial problem with many possible realisations. Knowledge of the relationship of patient outcomes with mathematically identifiable integer sets of ventilator setting parameters may help to understand which effects ventilator settings have on patient outcomes. An exploratory database study can provide a basis for further, prospective, interventional studies to find the optimal combination of ventilator settings. Main research question - To determine the relationship between the use of mathematically identifiable integer ventilator parameter sets and patient outcomes - Design (including population, confounders/outcomes) Retrospective database study of all cases of adult patients undergoing procedures in the UMCG under general anesthesia with IPPV between 01-01-2018 and 01-04-2023. Multivariate and mixed-model analyses, where appropriate, will be corrections for patient specific characteristics such as ASA PS, age, BMI, sex. - Expected results Using mathematically identifiable integer ventilatory parameter sets improves respiratory and/or hemodynamic patient outcomes.
In low and middle-income countries, open endotracheal suction catheters are used multiple times to perform suctioning due to limited resources [1,2]. Currently, there is limited evidence for using a new suction catheter for each suction pass, acknowledged in a review article of endotracheal suction procedures in paediatric populations [3]. Additionally, the latest artificial airway suctioning practice guidelines published by the American Association for Respiratory Care in 2022 did not mention any recommendations regarding suction catheter changing frequency [4]. The guidelines adopted a study conducted in 2001 which showed that reusing an open tracheal suctioning catheter is safe and cost effective [5]. Therefore, the current evidence of reusing suctioning catheters remains unclear, which rationalize the reason why some resource limited Intensive Care Units (ICUs) use the catheter multiple times during a 12-hour shift, and possibly explain the high ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) incidence in these ICUs [1,2]. Therefore, this study will propose to explore whether single-used suction catheters or multiple used open endotracheal tracheal suctioning catheters flushed with chlorhexidine are associated with reduced VAP incidence and its impact on mechanically ventilated patients.
This is a Phase 3, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, non-inferiority study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cefepime-taniborbactam compared to meropenem in patients ≥ 18 years of age with ventilated HABP or VABP.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about effects of chlorhexidine gluconate, sodium bicarbonate, ozonated water and hypochlorous acid solutions used in oral care of patients on mechanical ventilation support on preventing ventilator associated pneumonia. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: Is there any difference between 1% chlorhexidine gluconate, sodium bicarbonate, ozonated water and hypochlorous acid solutions versus 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate solution used in oral care in preventing the development of VAP? Is there any difference between 1% chlorhexidine gluconate, sodium bicarbonate, ozonated water and hypochlorous acid solutions versus 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate solution used in oral care in preventing the development of VAP? Researchers will compare 1% chlorhexidine gluconate, sodium bicarbonate, ozonated water and hypochlorous acid solutions to see if VAP
Severe trauma, head trauma, stroke and resuscitated cardiac arrest patients requiring endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation are at high risk of early-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia (EO-VAP). A short course of systemic antibiotic is recommended for prophylaxis. This study intends to assess the safety and efficacy of 2 alternative mechanical non-invasive airway clearance techniques in the prevention of EO-VAP in an open label randomized pilot trial of 20 subjects per study group i.e., 60 cases. The interventions will be in place for 7 days and the observational periods will be 14 days.
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a frequent and serious complication in the ICU, defined by the development of a lung infection in patients ventilated for more than 48 hours. The incidence rate of this condition exceeds 18 episodes per 1000 days of mechanical ventilation in Europe. This nosocomial infection is associated with the highest mortality, ranging from 24% to 76% depending on the series. Reducing the incidence of VAP remains a challenge for clinicians, as evidenced by the many recent recommendations that have led to "bundles" to prevent the onset of this complication. Despite this, these recommendations do not propose a strategy to prevent the recurrence of PAVM, a frequent entity with a reported incidence of 25-35% and a non-consensual definition that increases antibiotic consumption, duration of mechanical ventilation and length of stay in the ICU . In fact, these recurrences can be linked to: - Intrinsic patient risk factors (immunosuppression, severity of disease, major inflammatory response, reason for initial admission), - Inappropriate initial antibiotic therapy (type, duration and dose administered), - Characteristics specific to the pathogens encountered (virulence factors or resistance), - Intercurrent complications during management of the initial pneumonia (ARDS, abscess, pleural empyema). Given the frequency of these recurrences, and the persistent doubts about the role of terrain and pathogen characteristics in their genesis, it seems appropriate to look at risk factors that could help anticipate these events. The aim of our study will be to identify the risk factors and mortality associated with the occurrence of a recurrence of VAP in patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit. An essential first step in this work will be to identify and then use the most consensual definition of recurrence of VAP, encompassing recurrence, persistence and superinfection. We will use the definitions in the protocol for the ASPIC trial, which is currently undergoing enrolment. The second step is to identify risk factors for recurrence. By identifying these factors, it could be possible to propose a prognostic score that would enable careful monitoring (or modification of antibiotic therapy) of patients most at risk of recurrence. Such a score could then be evaluated in a prospective study.
This study is designed to investigate the effect of educational program for nurses about preventive care bundle for prevention of ventilator associated pneumonia among newborns.
The aims of this study are to investigate the effect of eliminating routine GRV monitoring on VAEs in patients receiving MV and early EF, Determine the effect of eliminating routine GRV monitoring on nutritional adequacy in patients receiving MV and early EF and evaluate the effect of eliminating routine GRV monitoring on feeding intolerance in patients receiving enteral feeding.
Mechanically ventilated patients are at risk of developing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), the diagnosis of which motivates the implementation of specific treatments, is one of the causes of VAP. The hypothesis of the study is that the incidence of IPA is 12.4%. For each patient presenting with a suspicion of VAP and requiring a bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), the diagnosis of API will be evaluated by biological examinations performed on blood and BAL. Medical and surgical history as well as clinical and biological data will be collected for 28 days or until discharge from the ICU.
Advanced stages of the response to life-threatening infection, severe trauma, or other physiological insults often lead to exhaustion of the homeostatic mechanisms that sustain normal blood pressure and oxygenation. These syndromic presentations often meet the diagnostic criteria of sepsis and/or the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the two most common syndromes encountered in the intensive care unit (ICU). Although critical illness syndromes, such as sepsis and ARDS, have separate clinical definitions, they often overlap clinically and share several common injury mechanisms. Moreover, there are no specific therapies for critically ill patients, and as a consequence, approximately 1 in 4 patients admitted to the ICU will not survive. The purpose of this observational study is to identify early patient biologic factors that are present at the time of ICU admission that will help diagnose critical illness syndromes earlier, identify who could benefit most from specific therapies, and enable the discovery of new treatments for syndromes such as sepsis and ARDS.