View clinical trials related to Ventilator Associated Pneumonia.
Filter by:Based on the hypothesis that keeping the endotracheal cuff pressure in the optimum range will reduce the incidence of vip, we aimed to compare the Manual (intermittent) measurement method with the Automatic (continuous) measurement method in reducing the incidence of vap.
Oral care with chlorhexidine was used to be considered an effective way to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). However, recent evidence revealed that oral care with chlorhexidine may associate with higher mortality and increasing risks of acute respiratory distress syndrome due to the aspiration of chlorhexidine. In addition, the majority of relevant studies in the past have only focused on cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU) or post-operation patients. Thus, whether this is effective and safe for medical ICU patients remains unclear.
The goal of this observational clinical trial is to learn about the role white blood cells (macrophages) play in lung inflammation in people with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. How does the immune system respond to different kinds of lung injury and inflammation and how do those processes differ from each other? 2. What roles do the cells that live in the lungs (macrophages) play in turning off inflammation? How does their role differ from other cells that are called to the lung to help repair injury (recruited macrophages)? 3. Will more frequent testing of lung cell samples help reduce the time it takes to start treatment for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and therefore reduce the rates of initial therapy failure? Participants will be in the intensive care unit (ICU) on a mechanical ventilator (machine that helps patients breathe) because they have ARDS or are on a mechanical ventilator for some other reason (control group). The following will happen: 1. Participants will be given 100% oxygen through the breathing machine (mechanical ventilator) for 3-5 minutes. This is called pre-oxygenation. 2. A lung specialist (pulmonologist), a member of Dr. Janssen's research team, or respiratory therapist will place small amount of saline into the lung using a long catheter going through the breathing tube. 3. The fluid will be removed with suction and will be sent to the laboratory for testing. 4. This will be repeated two more times over the course of 10 days, or less if participants are taken off of the ventilator. The procedure will be performed no more than three times. 5. Two nasal brushings will be taken from the participants' nose. 6. Approximately 3 tablespoons of blood will be removed by putting a needle into the participants vein. This is the standard method used to obtain blood for tests. A total of 9 tablespoons will be taken for research purposes over the course of this study 7. Data including the participants age, sex, severity of illness, and other medical conditions will be recorded to determine how these can affect the white blood cells. 8. If bacteria are isolated from the fluid in the participants lung, the participants' physician may choose to place the participants on antibiotics to treat an infection. 9. A follow-up phone call may be made by a member of the research team after discharge from the hospital. At this time, the participant may be invited to participate in the Post-ICU clinic at National Jewish Health.
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) is a bacterial respiratory infection that patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) often get when they cannot breathe for themselves and require mechanical ventilation. It is linked to higher chances of death, a longer stay in the hospital, higher costs, and the use of more antibiotics. Options to help prevent or treat this disease are in development and will require evaluation in future clinical trials. The goal of POS-VAP is to build and continuously train a network of ICUs to be prepared for doing these trials, to facilitate their execution.
Efficacy of cotrimoxazole as a de-escalation treatment for adult patients Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in intensive care unit Multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial comparing cotrimoxazole to standard antibiotic therapy for enterobacterial VAP
A multicenter Phase 2 study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of intravenous BV100 combined with Polymyxin B in adult patients with VABP suspected or confirmed to be due to CRAB
Multicentric observational prospective cohort study in 15 (fifteen) hospitals representing all Brazilian regions. The main objective of this project is to evaluate the incidence of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) when using the current ANVISA criteria for VAP versus VAE criteria defined by the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). The diagnostic accuracy of the two criteria for identifying VAP will also be compared, characterizing other events associated with mechanical ventilation that are not VAP, when applicable. The study also aims to adjudicate ventilator-associated pneumonias reported to ANVISA using current epidemiological diagnostic criteria.
The purpose of this study is to see if the amount of antibiotics given for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) can be decreased in order to reduce the risk of adverse effects associated with antibiotics, while at the same time ensuring the participant's safety.
Ventilator-associated pneumonia is the leading cause of nosocomial infection in the ICU. The pathogens responsible are multiple, but enterobacteria constitute a major source of pathogens involved. Within this family, Klebsiella spp. and Escherichia coli are the two most frequent genera, with Klebsiella spp. often present in severe forms. The factors associated with the occurrence of Ventilator-associated pneumonia and its adverse course depend on host defenses and the virulence of the pathogen. The virulence of Klebsiella spp. depends on several structures, notably the presence of a capsule, the particularities of its lipopolysaccharide, its adhesins (type 3 fimbriae), its capacity to capture iron (siderophores). The objective of this work is to evaluate the role of these different virulence mechanisms in the evolution of Ventilator-associated pneumonia and the hospital prognosis.
This is a single centre, open-label, feasibility randomised controlled trial. The study aims to assess the feasibility of conducting an RCT to compare the PneuX ETT with standard care in hospitalised patients requiring mechanical ventilation. The patient population for this study are those who are experiencing critical illness requiring intubation and ventilatory support. Patients will be randomised in equal proportions into one of 2 arms: to be intubated using a Venner PneuX Endotracheal Tube (ETT) or using the standard tube. For this feasibility study, a total of 50 patients will be randomised into two groups (25 in each). All patients will be recruited at a single site (University Hospital of Wales, part of Cardiff & Vale UHB). The study will investigate several feasibility measures including recruitment, delivery of the intervention (including device-related adverse events), acceptability and adherence to the intervention and sampling, use of Peptest to measure microaspiration events, rate of pepsin positive samples, rate of tracheobronchial colonisation, volume of sub-glottic aspirate, rate of VAP, length of ICU and hospital stay, demonstrate the validity of study documentation and provide preliminary data for 50 patients. The data will inform the pilot and main phase of the study.