View clinical trials related to Venous Thromboembolism.
Filter by:Thrombosis is common and contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. At least 20% of patients with cancer develop venous thromboembolism (VTE) and another 5% will experience acute arterial thromboembolism (ATE) due to cancer and its treatment. Current guidelines recommend VTE thromboprophylaxis in high-risk outpatients. Thromboprophylaxis strategies are inadequate as 50% of high-risk patients on prophylaxis still develop a VTE, the rate of recurrent VTE is ~24% with a case fatality rate of 14.8%, and the incidence of major bleeding is ~13% with a case fatality rate of 8.9%. We and others have implicated platelets in both the pathogenesis of VTE as well as cancer growth and metastasis. To investigate a new biomarker of risk in patients with cancer, we propose a pilot study to determine whether quantification of platelet FcɣRIIa expression can discriminate risk of VTE and cancer progression. We chose platelet FcɣRIIa expression because we have found that quantifying platelet surface expression of FcγRIIa identifies patients at high and low risk of thrombotic arterial events. Thus, we hypothesize that elevated platelet expression of FcγRIIa will identify patients with cancer who are greater risk of VTE as well as cancer progression. The proposed studies leverage a clinical research program that was established in 2015 at the University of Vermont Cancer Center (Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Care Clinic [VTEPACC]) and will allow simultaneous access to research samples, thrombosis complications and cancer outcomes in order to achieve the following specific aims: 1) To determine whether platelet expression of FcγRIIa identifies cancer patients at high and low risk of VTE, and 2) To determine whether increased platelet expression of FcγRIIa is associated with a) advanced stage cancer at the time of enrollment and b) greater progression of cancer. Platelet reactivity is increased in patients with cancer and has been associated with VTE risk. Platelet expression of FcγRIIa can increase the risk of thrombosis by both increasing platelet reactivity and by promoting the procoagulant potential of platelets. In addition, platelets promote cancer by facilitating tumor vascularization, growth, and metastasis. FcγRIIa has been shown to be a key mediator of platelet secretion and cross-talk between platelets and tumor cells. Thus, we propose that increased platelet FcγRIIa expression will be linked to enhanced tumor growth and metastasis by facilitating cancer-tumor cell cross-talk and thereby the activation of platelets that leads to the release of platelet products. Identification of a biomarker capable of discriminating high and low risk of VTE will provide an important precision tool that could be combined with existing tools to guide therapy and improve outcomes. Results from aim 2 will provide key preliminary data in support of novel antiplatelet treatments to limit cancer progression.
Objective: To prospectively evaluate clinical outcomes during guideline-recommended LMWH dose escalation for recurrent VTE during LMWH or DOAC treatment for cancer-associated thrombosis. Study design: International, prospective, observational cohort study Study population: Adult cancer patients with symptomatic or incidental recurrent VTE while receiving LMWH or DOACs for acute VTE are eligible. Main exclusion criteria include anticoagulant treatment for the recurrent VTE for more than 72 hours, severe hepatic dysfunction, active bleeding, recent major surgery, uncontrolled hypertension, known bleeding diathesis, and a life expectancy of less than 1 month. Study procedures: Patients will be managed at the discretion of the treating physician, who will be encouraged to follow guideline recommendations. These guidelines suggest supra-therapeutic dose LMWH for 4 weeks (+/- 5 days) followed by therapeutic dose LMWH or therapeutic dose DOAC, while it is suggested to treat patients with VTE recurrence during maintenance dose LMWH (i.e. 75 to 80% of full therapeutic weight adjusted dose) with therapeutic dose of LMWH or DOAC. Main study parameters/endpoints: The co-primary outcomes are new symptomatic or incidental recurrent VTE during 3 months of follow-up and on-treatment major bleeding. Secondary outcomes include recurrent incidental VTE, recurrent symptomatic VTE, recurrent incidental or symptomatic proximal or distal DVT, recurrent incidental or symptomatic PE, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, all-cause mortality, and cancer-related mortality. VTE occurring at other sites such as cerebral DVT or splanchnic DVT will also be recorded.
Retrospective chart review to be conducted at Methodist Richardson Medical Center (MRMC) in Richardson, TX. All adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19 on enoxaparin for DVT prophylaxis will be included. Collected data will be analyzed to determine the safety and effectiveness of the varying enoxaparin doses, and results will be presented at the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists Midyear conference in December 2022.
Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality therefore prevention is imperative to reduce its burden. VTE prophylaxis in ICU patients is primarily pharmacological using low molecular weight heparin. This study aims to determine the proportion of ICU patients receiving VTE prophylaxis that achieves appropriate anti-factor Xa activity (aFXa) prophylactic levels and to characterize this patient population Methods: Seventy-five patients admitted to the General ICU were included. Peak and trough aFXa levels were measured at 4 and 23 hours respectively after receiving the second consecutive daily enoxaparin 40 mg sc injection. Patients in whom peak aFXa levels were found to be sub-prophylactic, peak and trough levels were repeated as above
Liver transplantation is currently an effective treatment for end-stage liver disease. The high incidence of thrombotic related complications in the early postoperative period after orthotopic liver transplantation(OLT) has been attributed to many factors, such as the long operation time, the high trauma, the need for prolonged bed rest after operation, and the instability of coagulation status in the early postoperative period. Among them, venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the most common complications after liver transplantation, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), which seriously affect the survival of patients after transplantation. Although the Caprini score is currently recognized as a more mature thrombotic risk assessment tool in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. However, because of the long operation time of liver transplantation and central venous catheterization and other factors, the majority of surgical patients score ≥ 5 points, which are all very high-risk grades. It loses the power of this model for risk stratification and targeted prevention. How to correctly identify people at high risk of VTE after OLT, early diagnosis of VTE and aggressive implementation of correct preventive measures appear essential. Therefore, this study was designed as a single center case-control study to review and analyze the incidence, clinical characteristics, and associated risk factors of VTE after OLT, and to establish a nomogram risk assessment model and validate its predictive efficacy.
In this prospective, randomised, open-label, parallel group, feasibility trial; the investigators will objectively assess whether it is feasible to apply the Geko device to critically ill adults for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared to usual care with intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPCs).
Retrospective monocentric registry to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different anticoagulants in patients with thromboembolic antiphospholipid syndrome
This study is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, prospective phase 2 dose ranging study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Dimolegin - DD217 in prevention of venous thromboembolic complications in patients underwent knee replacement. The study model is at each stage in parallel groups. Dimolegin - DD217 efficacy and safety in prevention of venous thromboembolic complications during knee replacement in groups of 80 patients will be investigated. Patients who meet all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be randomized into three therapy groups: two therapy groups of the test drug Dimolegin - DD217 (40 mg (group 1a) and 60 mg (group 1b)) and one reference group (Fragmin). Bilateral phlebography (preferably) or ultrasound duplex scanning (USDS) will be performed on the Day of the V13 visit. It is planned to randomize 240 patients (160 patients in two different groups of Dimolegin - DD217 therapy and 80 patients in the reference group of Fragmin (INN: dalteparin). The number of patients included in the study and randomized to receive Dimolegin - DD217, at the first stage, can be increased in the case of starting recruitment to additional group 1b. The maximum number of patients who can be included in the study at the first stage is 320. In total, no more than 480 patients can take part in the screening. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters will be determined in patients who voluntarily give their consent to participate in the pharmacokinetic study (PKS) and pharmacodynamic study (PDS) and sign a Patient Information Leaflet with an informed consent form for participation in the PKS and PDS. PK parameters are planned to be determined in 18-20 patients (50 % of each sex) in each patient group. Participation in the voluntary part of PK study will be offered to all patients. The analysis of the composite endpoint frequency will be carried out using a generalized linear model for binary response. A formal conclusion about superiority will be made if the lower limit of the specified confidence intervals exceeds the value of 0.0. A formal conclusion on non-inferiority will be made if the lower limit of the specified confidence intervals exceeds the value of -0.05 (-5.0 %).
Study purpose was to study the safety and efficacy of Dimolegin - DD217 as a drug for prevention of thrombotic complications compared to Clexane (enoxaparin sodium) - the standard therapy currently prescribed to patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Patients who met all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria were randomized into two therapy groups: - Group 1 - test drug Dimolegin - DD217 (60 mg orally, 1 time per day); - Group 2 - reference drug Clexane (40 mg subcutaneously, 1 time per day). The study drugs were taken once a day until: - the discharge from the hospital due to recovery or positive dynamics; - or up to 30 days of the patient's stay in the hospital; - or until the Investigator decides to discontinue the therapy for other reasons. Planned: screening of up to 450 patients, randomization: 430 (215 per group). The required number of patients is 200 per group as a result of the entire study.
This is a Phase 3, multicenter, open-label, blinded endpoint study to evaluate the effect of abelacimab relative to dalteparin on venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence and bleeding in patients with gastrointestinal (GI)/genitourinary (GU) cancer associated VTE (Magnolia)