View clinical trials related to Varicose Veins.
Filter by:Longitudinal ultrasound orientation during central venous cannulation has been suggested by a number of radomised studies to offer superior cannulation rates. This technique may offer a simple, safe and cost-neutral step to improve cannulation rates in the widely performed minimally invasive endovenous intervention.
This study will be looking at the effect of Ambulatory Selective Varices Ablation under Local Anesthesia (ASVAL) and Endovenous Laser Ablation (EVLA) with concomitant phlebectomy in patients with incompetent great saphenous vein (GSV).
This study is a retrospective, chart review of treatment of patients with symptomatic varicose veins. Treated limbs must have the Great Saphenous Vein and/or Small Saphenous Vein treated with either cyanoacrylate closure (VenaSeal) or Endothermal Ablation (either Radiofrequency Ablation or Endovenous Laser Ablation).
Mechanisms of the development of pain in chronic venous diseases (CVD), including pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS), are studied incompletely. The existing hypotheses of the occurrence of venous pelvic pain (VVP) do not allow to answer the question why some patients have no pain syndrome while others have very pronounced pain despite the same morphofunctional changes in the pelvic veins? The investigators are planning to carry out a study aimed at studying the content of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and substance P (SP) in the serum of patients with pelvic veins and pelvic pain, and to study the relationship between the values of CGRP and SP in these patients.
Cirrhosis leads to portal hypertension and development of gastroesophageal varices, which are the most common cause for bleeding in cirrhosis and a major cause of death. The American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) recommends screening endoscopy every 2 years to evaluate for gastroesophageal varices, and annual surveillance for those with small varices on endoscopy. Unfortunately, endoscopy is costly, requires sedation, is poorly tolerated, is subject to high inter-observer variability, and is associated with risks that include bleeding, esophageal injury and aspiration. Noninvasive methods for evaluation of gastroesophageal varices are needed. CT is noninvasive, rapid, less expensive than endoscopy, requires no sedation, provides a quantitative measure of the size of the varices, and allows for assessment of para-esophageal varices, varices in other body locations, ascites, other signs of portal hypertension, patency of liver vasculature, and detection, diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma. Single-Energy CT (SECT) has relatively high accuracy in prospective studies for detection of any and large varices but is associated with suboptimal contrast opacification of gastroesophageal varices. Dual-Energy CT with the GE scanners with GSI Xtream (DECT) improves the contrast-to-noise ratio by 60% compared to SECT and is currently standard of care at UAB for evaluation of cirrhosis. The primary objective of this study is to determine the accuracy of DECT for detecting any varices and high-risk varices. The study hypothesis is that the accuracy (AUROC) of DECT will be >0.90 and >0.95 for detecting any and high-risk varices in a prospective pilot study (N=50) that uses endoscopy as the reference standard. This will be a single-center pilot observational prospective IRB-approved study. A total of 50 adult patients presenting to UAB Endoscopy for surveillance endoscopy to detect and grade gastroesophageal varices will be enrolled.
The study aims to assess the efficacy of VenaSeal™ Closure System (VCS) for the treatment of lower extremity superficial truncal veins in a real-world clinical setting, in a multi-racial Asian population in Singapore.
The goal of this registry is to evaluate the indication for EndoVenous Laser Ablation (EVLA) therapy. Can this be enhanced? What are the reasons for not using the laser? Therefore, this study aims to define clear indications for EVLA by registering the incentives of the participating investigators to use the laser instead of conventional corrective surgery for the treatment of varicose veins, at baseline and post-operative. Additionally, the efficacy and safety of the different varicose vein treatments will be evaluated by registering procedural characteristics, anatomic outcome (duplex ultrasound), quality of life (AVVQ) and postoperative pain (VAS).
The aim of this pilot study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined and simultaneous endoscopic variceal obliteration together with balloon occluded-retrograde transvenous obliteration (B-RTO) for the treatment of high-risk gastric varices
This study is designed to describe the difference in varicose vein outcomes found from using a neuromuscular electrical stimulation device for different amounts of time - Group A (control - no device), Group B (device for 30 mins per day) and Group C (device for 60 mins per day). The groups are assessed after 6 weeks of intervention.
This study aims to prove that the ELVeS® Radial® 2ring slim fiber is safe and effective in endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of varicose veins, with a reliable durability by evaluating procedural details/outcomes, clinical success, anatomic success, pain, post-operative adverse events and re-interventions.