View clinical trials related to Vancomycin.
Filter by:Bacterial blood stream infections are common and life-threatening. Bloodstream infections have historically been identified using blood cultures, which often take 24-72 hours to result and are imperfectly sensitive. Early administration of antimicrobial therapy is a fundamental component of the management of adults presenting to the hospital with a suspected bloodstream infection and/or sepsis. But because blood cultures frequently take 24-72 hours to result, patients are typically treated with empiric, broad spectrum antibiotics. In a meta-analysis of sepsis studies, empirical antibiotic therapy was inappropriate for the organism that ultimately grew in culture in almost half of patients. Thus, patients are commonly exposed to unnecessary antibiotics without evidence of infection or with evidence of infection requiring narrow antibiotic selection. For example, current guidelines recommend the use of empiric intravenous vancomycin as coverage for a bloodstream infection caused by the bacterial pathogen methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Vancomycin requires careful monitoring due to its narrow therapeutic range and high risk of toxicity. Administration of vancomycin to patients who do not have MRSA can lead to avoidable adverse drug events and costs, as well as drive antimicrobial resistance. There has been increasing interest in using rapid diagnostic tests that identify bacteria directly from whole blood samples without relying on growth in culture, referred to as "direct-from-blood" tests, to guide early therapeutic management of patients with suspected bloodstream infections in addition to standard blood cultures. One such FDA-approved, direct-from-blood test is the T2Bacteria® Panel. This panel's performance as a direct-from blood test for bacterial pathogens has been described in previous studies. A recent meta-analysis of largely observational studies reported a faster transition to targeted microbial therapy and de-escalation of empirical microbial therapy, as well as a shorter duration of intensive care unit stay and hospital stay for patients who received this direct-from-blood test. We will conduct a pragmatic, randomized clinical trial examining the effect of using the T2Bacteria® Panel direct from-blood testing, compared to using blood cultures alone (standard of care), on antimicrobial receipt and clinical outcomes for adults presenting to the hospital with suspected infection and who have been initiated on empiric therapy with intravenous vancomycin.
In 2020, only 16% of the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients achieved therapeutic drug concentrations after continuous administration of the first vancomycin dose. Many beneficial population pharmacokinetic (PPK) models are available however these are prevented from being widely implemented in daily practice due to the complexity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of individualized dosing with PPK models using a newly developed user-friendly pharmacokinetic (PK) tool. In a preceding retrospective study, the percentage of patients within the target range after initiation of continuous vancomycin increased from 28% to 39% (excluding CRRT and ECMO patients) with calculated concentrations based on theoretical dose adjustments. In this study we want to prospectively evaluate the concentration of vancomycin at 24, 28 and 72 hours after the start of treatment with individualized dosages based on (a combination) of available PPK models in 134 adult ICU and orthopedic patients.
Hospitalized adult participants prescribed vancomycin by their treating physician will be randomized to receive vancomycin via continuous or intermittent infusion and measures of kidney function and injury will be collected.
The overall objective of this project is to investigate the utility of model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) of vancomycin in non-critically ill adults. This evaluation includes a comparison with the more standard approach on clinical and patient-oriented measures.
A widely used antibiotic is vancomycin. To ensure adequate exposure to vancomycin, drug doses are adjusted based on whole-blood concentration measurements, a practice known as therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The need for TDM of vancomycin is well established, as described in several national and international guidelines, for dose-optimization in order to achieve successful treatment and to prevent toxicity and reduce microbial resistance. A sampling method for TDM that has become more popular over the recent years is dried blood spotting (DBS). DBS is a design of blood sampling consisting of positioning a drop of capillary blood, preferably taken from the finger, on filter paper. Unlike venous blood sampling (the current gold standard for TDM of vancomycin), DBS seems to have advantages for the patient. The finger prick is less invasive than venipuncture. DBS also enables patients to perform one or multiple finger prick(s) themselves, with the possibility to sample at multiple time points. Due to the fact that vancomycin is nephrotoxic, it would be very efficient and convenient to measure creatinine in the same dried blood spot as the vancomycin. This study is a clinical validation study to validate the DBS assay for vancomycin.
This study will evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic dosing properties of intravenous vancomycin in pediatric patients using a novel computer decision support (CDS) tool called Lyv. Dosing will be individualized based on AUC24/MIC. The results will be compared to matched historical controls.
This is a single-center prospective pharmacokinetic study. The principal objective is to collect new data among patients with hematologic cancer to develop a Bayesian population pharmacokinetic model and to improve dose adjustment of intravenous vancomycin. Approximately 40 subjects meeting the inclusion and no exclusion criteria will be enrolled in the study. Vancomycin blood concentration will be measured at steady-state at three different moment for each participant : immediately before the infusion, 1 hour after the infusion and during the elimination phase (at 3, 4 or 5 hours after the infusion). This additional vancomycin serum concentration in the elimination phase will be used to estimate more precisely the vancomycin pharmacokinetic parameters in this specific population including the distribution volume and the elimination of the molecule. Ultimately, the purpose of this study is to create a nomogram to predict the optimal initial vancomycin dosing in adult patients with a hematologic cancer.
This pilot study is a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label trial to assess the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of sufficient quality that would assess the efficacy and safety of vancomycin adjustments according to Area under the curve/Minimal inhibitory concentration (AUC0-24h/MIC) calculated by the Bayesian approach rather than by a trough dosage. Randomization will be stratified according to infection severity. Approximately 60 subjects meeting all inclusion and no exclusion criteria will be randomized to have pharmacists perform vancomycin dose adjustments with AUC0-24h / MIC calculated by the Bayesian approach versus the trough dosage approach.
The overall objective of this project is to investigate the large-scale utility of MIPD of vancomycin at point-of-care in ICU children. This evaluation includes a comparison with the more standard approach on Clinical and patient-oriented measures.
The objective of this study is to evaluate a novel vancomycin intraosseous administration protocol vs a standard IV vancomycin administration protocol for primary total hip arthroplasty patients.