View clinical trials related to Vaccine Adverse Reaction.
Filter by:Few patients receiving SARS-CoV-2 vaccines may experience rare but serious adverse events such as transverse myelitis (TM). Today, data about TM are scarce. The objective was to investigate reports of TM adverse events related to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines labelled by FDA and EMA, including ChAdOx1nCov-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca), BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech), mRNA-1273 (Moderna) and Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen/Johnson & Johnson) and using the World Health Organization's (WHO) pharmacovigilance database: VigiBase.
A pneumonia of unknown cause detected in Wuhan, China, was first reported in December 2019. On 08 January 2020, the pathogen causing this outbreak was identified as a novel coronavirus 2019. The outbreak was declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern on 30 January 2020. On 12 February 2020, the virus was officially named as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and the WHO officially named the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). On 11 March 2020, the WHO upgraded the status of the COVID-19 outbreak from epidemic to pandemic, which is now spreading globally at high speed. There are currently few licensed vaccines to prevent infection with SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 and the duration of response is unknown. Given the rapid transmission of COVID-19 and incidence of disease on a worldwide basis, the rapid development of effective vaccines with sufficient protection and duration of response is of utmost importance. IAU has developed a thermally stable plasmid DNA (pDNA)-based vaccine candidate using a platform approach that enables the rapid development of vaccines against emerging viral diseases, including SARS-CoV-2. The pDNA vaccine developed by IAU is a synthetic, codon-optimized, encode either the full-length Spike (S) gene or S1 domain of SARS-CoV-2 as genes of interest. Here, we aim to test a synthetic, codon optimized pDNA encoding S.opt.FL as vaccine candidate against COVID-19. A key advantage of pDNA vaccine is that multiple immunization can be used without the limitations of anti-vector responses. This study is intended to investigate the safety, immunogenicity, and tolerbilty of this prophylactic vaccine against COVID-19 administered as intramuscular immunization (i.m.).
In this phase 1 study, the inactivated virus vaccine National Research Centre (NRC) Vaccine-101 (VACC-101) will be investigated for its safety and immunogenicity in healthy volunteers with the aim of providing effective and safe protection against COVID-19.
Background: ISHLT and AASLD guidelines recommend SARS-CoV2 vaccination in all individuals undergoing lung and liver transplantation, but there are currently scarce data on the safety and efficacy of these vaccines in this population. In Italy, immunocompromised patients have received the indication to be administered mRNA vaccines only. Primary outcome: safety and reactogenicity Secondary outcomes: immunogenicity and prevention of COVID19 Visits and timepoints: - T0: before first dose administration: visit and venous sampling to assess baseline COVID19 serum status - Telephone calls to assess safety and reactogenicity 1 and 2 days after each dose of vaccination - T21 or 28 (based on vaccine; mRNA BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, respectively): visit, venous sampling to assess immunogenicity - Follow up visits after 60, 120, 180 and 365 from T0: visit and venous sampling to assess immunogenicity
If your serious vaccine-induced adverse event has been entered in the CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) we are interested in enrolling you for this study in order to log your symptoms. The primary goal of this study is to create a national database and gather vaccine-associated serious adverse events/injury data from newly vaccinated individuals in the US in order to identify the possible underlying causal relationships and plausible underlying biological mechanisms. The project aims to identify the genetic determinants of vaccine-induced adverse response by studying host genetics. We plan to use whole genome sequencing to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with cardiovascular, neurological, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal and immunological symptoms induced by vaccine administration. The secondary goal is to establish criteria that enable classification of vaccine-induced adverse events/injuries compare data from our database with the official Vaccine Injury Table National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on or after March 21, 2017. The tertiary goal is to establish a database to gather detailed long-term adverse reaction data from subjects enrolled in FDA Emergency Use Authorized vaccine clinical trials.
Numerous vaccination studies are conducted to protect against COVID-19 infection, and preclinical and clinical studies are still ongoing worldwide. During this extraordinary period, the necessity to perform COVID-19 vaccine studies and immunization programs together has emerged. Many manufacturing companies have started mass production of vaccines accepting the risk of failure of vaccines during trials. Vaccine Adverse Effects (VAEs) need to be documented quickly. We aimed to determine the VAEs and to compare the frequency of VAEs between groups according to socio-demographic characteristics after the inactivated vaccine (Corona Vac®) was administered to healthcare workers (HCWs) in Turkey. In this study, an online questionnaire was delivered to volunteer healthcare workers across the whole country. Sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, history of COVID-19 infection, and VAEs occurring after the first and second doses of inactivated vaccine were evaluated.
Randomized, Blind, Placebo-controlled Phase- I Study and Randomized, Open Phase Phase-II Study of QazCoVac-P - COVID-19 Subunit Vaccine in Healthy Adult Volunteers From 18 Years Old and Elder
This study collects information on expectations and attitudes towards the COVID-19 vaccines in participants about to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. This information will be linked to data on side effect occurrence collected in an independent study.
To determine if patients with a history of Diabetes Mellitus Type I or II developed a change in blood glucose levels as reported on Continuous glucose monitoring devices (CGMS) within the first week following administration of each dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic presents a great challenge to global health. The first case was identified in December 2019 in Wuhan, China and since has infected nearly 100 million people and claimed almost 2 million lives worldwide. In response, the medical community and scientists have worked hard to develop effective therapies and guidelines to treat a wide range of symptoms including the use of the antiviral drug remdesivir, convalescent plasma, antibiotics, steroids, and anticoagulant therapy. To prevent the spread of the disease, multiple vaccines based on mRNA and DNA technologies that include inactivated viral components have been developed and millions of doses are currently being administered worldwide. Early analysis of data from the phase III Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccine trials suggested the vaccine was more than 90% effective in preventing the illness with a good safety profile (Polack et al., 2020). However, there are still many unknowns regarding the long-term safety of these newer vaccine technologies and the level and duration of immunogenicity. SARS-CoV-2 infection results in seroconversion and production of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The antibodies may suppress viral replication through neutralization but might also participate in COVID-19 pathogenesis through a process termed antibody-dependent enhancement (Lu et al., 2020). Rapid progress has been made in the research of antibody response and therapy in COVID-19 patients, including characterization of the clinical features of antibody responses in different populations infected by SARS-CoV-2, treatment of COVID-19 patients with convalescent plasma and intravenous immunoglobin products, isolation and characterization of a large panel of monoclonal neutralizing antibodies and early clinical testing, as well as clinical results from several COVID-19 vaccine candidates. In this study, we plan to assess the effic of both vaccines on the healthcare workers. As healthcare workers begin to receive their first vaccination dosage, we will start looking for traces of antibodies within the blood and saliva. The data provided will help us determine the efficacy of the vaccine over a period of 1 year, identify any difference in efficacy amongst different populations (gender, age, and ethnicities) differences among vaccine types, demographics and follow-up on any potential side effects. We will collaborate with Nirmidas Biotech Inc. based in Palto Alto, California, a Stanford University spinoff on this project. Nirmidas Biotech. Inc is a young diagnostic company that have received several FDA EUA tests for COVID-19. We will perform IgG/IgM antibody detection by the NIRMIDAS MidaSpot™ COVID-19 Antibody Combo Detection Kit approved by FDA EUA for POC testing in our hospital site for qualitative antibody testing. We will then send dry blood spot and saliva to Nirmidas for the pGOLD™ COVID-19 High Accuracy IgG/IgM Assay to quantify antibody levels and avidity, both of which are important to immunity. The pGOLD assay is a novel nanotechnology assay platform capable of quantifying antibody levels and binding affinity to viruses. We collaborated recently with Nirmidas on this platform and published a joint paper in Nature Biomedical Engineering on COVID-19 Ab pGOLD assay (Liu et al., 2020). It is also capable of detecting antibodies in saliva samples and could offer a non-invasive approach to assessing antibody response for vaccination.