View clinical trials related to Urinary Bladder Neoplasms.
Filter by:Registry study to gather more information on the current use of Blue Light Cystoscopy with Cysview (BLCC) in urologists' practices.
Muscle invasive (MIBC) and/or metastatic bladder cancer is associated with poor prognosis and no target therapies for this pathology are currently validated. By 40 gene expression signature realized on frozen samples, we have previously identified an aggressive sub-class of MIBC, called basal. This sub-class (20% of MIBC) showed strong EGFR dependence in vitro and in vivo (Rebouissou et al. Science Translational Medicine 2014). This observation suggests a possible response to EGFR targeted therapy in patients of this subgroup. Our aim is to establish a standard diagnostic tool to differentiate the basal subtype of bladder cancer and evaluate the effect of anti-EGFR therapy, by analyzing previous clinical trial (GETUG19) and preclinical models, which compare the classical chemotherapy to anti-EGFR associated chemotherapy.
In this study, participants with high risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) unresponsive to Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG) therapy and who are considered ineligible for or have refused to undergo radical cystectomy, will receive pembrolizumab therapy or pembrolizumab in combination with other investigational agents. The primary study hypothesis is that treatment with pembrolizumab will result in a clinically meaningful response.
This is a prospective randomised controlled trial that will compare the outcomes of rectus sheath catheters to epidurals in patients who have undergone a cystectomy, via a lower midline abdominal incision for bladder cancer.
PLUMMB is an phase I trial to investigate the safety, tolerability and effectiveness of an immunotherapy drug called Pembrolizumab used in combination with radiotherapy. The study will also investigate two different doses of pembrolizumab, starting at 100mg (through an intravenous drip) and increasing to 200mg for the next cohort of patients, if the first dose is well tolerated. The patients suitable for this study will be: Group A those with locally advanced bladder cancer or Group B patients whose cancer has spread from the bladder (metastatic bladder cancer). Treatment in the PLUMMB trial will start with a pembrolizumab 2 weeks prior to starting a course of 4 - 6 weeks radiotherapy. Treatment with pembrolizumab will then be given every three weeks. Patients in Group A will then continue to take pembrolizumab for up to a year unless they have disease progression or unacceptable side effects in the meantime. Patients in Group B will continue taking pembrolizumab for as long as needed until they have disease progression or unacceptable side effects. Patients will be seen every 3 weeks during treatment and every 3-6 months thereafter. CT scans will be done every 3 months during treatment and as per usual care (usually 6 monthly) after the treatment has finished. Patients in Group A will also have a cystoscopy (camera test) to look into the bladder 3 months after they finish radiotherapy. This is standard care and would be the same for patients not on a research study.
Bladder cancer is a well-recognized complication in spinal cord injury (SCI) individuals. The observed incidence rates in SCI individuals are considerably higher compared to the general population. Bladder cancer in SCI individuals tends to present at an earlier age compared to the general population. Furthermore, bladder cancer in SCI individuals is more commonly invasive and at a more advanced stage at the time of diagnosis compared to bladder cancer in the general population. Individuals with bladder cancer commonly present with hematuria and other urinary symptoms. The gold standard for diagnosis is cystoscopy. However in SCI individuals, hematuria may get attributed to catheter irritation or trauma or an urinary tract infection. Furthermore, the bladder wall commonly presents with various changes under cystoscopic examination masking the presence of a bladder wall mass. Thus, diagnosis of bladder cancer in SCI individuals can be complicate. There is a novel test available (GeneXpert® Bladder Cancer Detection, Cepheid International, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) for the measurement of mRNA bladder tumor markers in the urine. The diagnostic accuracy of this test has been investigated in non-SCI individuals with symptoms suspicious for bladder cancer. The test showed high sensitivity and specificity values and is thus a promising diagnostic or screening tool.. However, the diagnostic accuracy of the test has not yet been investigated in SCI individuals. The primary objective of the proposed study is to investigate whether urine mRNA tumor marker levels in spinal cord injury individuals with symptoms and findings suspicious for bladder cancer are a discriminator between individuals suffering from bladder cancer and those not suffering from cancer. Individuals presenting with symptoms suspicious of bladder cancer will undergo ultrasonic and cystoscopic examination of the bladder. An urine sample will be taken, and the bladder will be flushed for collecting a bladder fluid sample. In patients with bladder wall findings suspicious of cancer, a bladder wall biopsy will be taken, according to clinical standard practice. The bladder fluid and the bladder wall biopsy will be submitted for cytology and histopathology examination, respectively. Tumor mRNA levels will be measured in the urine sample.
Background: Autologous T cells engineered to express a T cell receptor (TCR) targeting NY-ESO-1 will be infused back to patients with NY-ESO-1- expressing malignancies. The patients pretreated with a lymphodepleting preconditioning regimen will be monitored after infusion of anti-NY-ESO-1 TCR-transduced T cells for adverse events, persistence of anti-NY-ESO-1 TCR-transduced T cells and treatment efficacy. Objectives: To evaluate the safety and the efficacy of anti-NY-ESO-1 TCR-transduced T cell-based immunotherapy for patients with NY-ESO-1- expressing malignancies. Eligibility: Patients older than one year of age, who have relapsed or refractory malignancies that express both NY-ESO-1 and human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2 molecules. Patients must have adequate organ functions. Design: - Peripheral blood from patients will be collected for isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), which will be transduced with a lentiviral or retroviral vector encoding an HLA-A2 restricted anti-NY-ESO-1 TCR gene. - Patients will receive a lymphodepleting preconditioning regimen to prepare their immune system to accept modified T cells. - Patients will receive an infusion of their own modified T cells. They will remain in the hospital to be monitored for adverse events until they have recovered from the treatment. - Patients will have frequent follow-up visits to monitor the persistence of modified T cells and efficacy of the treatment.
The purpose of this study is to compare medical and surgical treatments of benign prostate hyperplasia in patients who have non muscle invasive bladder cancer for tumour recurrence and progression.
A single arm, single center window of opportunity trial of using a combination of metformin and simvastatin as a neoadjuvant treatment for patients with invasive bladder cancer who are to undergo cystectomy. The study will assess the feasibility of conducting window of opportunity trials in invasive bladder cancer the drug combination's affects on a variety of important clinicopathologic variables. The goal is to enroll 44 patients within 18 months. An interim analysis will be conducted at 12 months, and the study will be prematurely closed if fewer than 10 patients have been enrolled at that time. Patients will be administered 850mg of metformin twice daily along with 20mg of Simvastatin. Patients will be enrolled following the formal diagnosis of invasive bladder cancer or at first visit following referral to the London Health Sciences Center (LHSC). Patient's will receive metformin and simvastatin from the time of enrollment until the night prior to their operation in the absence of safety or tolerability concerns.
To date, no trials have been designed to compare open Vs laparoscopic radical cystectomy in the elderly patients, both in terms of functional and clinical outcome measures. A more meaningful comparison of the two modalities is that of a randomized controlled trial.