Clinical Trials Logo

Ureteral Calculi clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Ureteral Calculi.

Filter by:
  • Terminated  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT03656913 Terminated - Nephrolithiasis Clinical Trials

Validation of Low Dose CT for Diagnosis of Urolithiasis

Start date: November 30, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The investigators have developed an extremely low dose renal computed tomography (CT) protocol that on preliminary testing has an effective dose in the range of a single view abdominal radiograph. The investigators plan to test this exam in patients with known or suspected urolithiasis undergoing clinically indicated CT.

NCT ID: NCT03614052 Terminated - Urolithiasis Clinical Trials

Tamsulosin as Adjuvant Treatment Prior to Endoscopic Ureterolithotomy

Start date: June 1, 2018
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This a study aiming to compare treatment with tamsulosin versus placebo in patients undergoing endoscopic treatment for urolithiasis. The main outcome is the rate of stone free patients.

NCT ID: NCT02369744 Terminated - Ureteral Stone Clinical Trials

Silodosin Versus Tamsulosin for Treatment of Ureteral Stones

Start date: March 2013
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Ureteral calculi, commonly known as kidney stones, are a frequent cause of Emergency Department (ED) visits. These stones can get caught in the ureter (the tube connecting the kidney to the bladder) and cause symptoms including pain, nausea, and vomiting. As long as the obstructing stone meets certain conditions and the patient isn't too sick, the patient is usually sent home to try and pass the stone without surgery. This treatment is known as medical expulsive therapy (MET), and routinely involves the use of a drug called tamsulosin, which relaxes the smooth muscle of the urinary system to help the stone pass. Silodosin is a drug in the same class of tamsulosin, but which is thought to have a more selective action and a quicker onset, which would theoretically make it better for aiding in kidney stone passage. The purpose of this study is a head-to-head, blinded comparison of these two drugs to see how quickly they result in stone passage. Subjects are patients presenting to the ED with acute kidney stone shown by CT scan, and who are appropriate for MET. The main study intervention is randomization to receiving either tamsulosin or silodosin. The hypothesis is that silodosin will have decreased time to stone passage compared to tamsulosin. Subjects who qualify and consent are randomized to a two-week course of either silodosin or tamsulosin. They are also given prescriptions for standard of care medications for pain and nausea, as well as a pain diary. They receive a follow-up phone call after one week to remind them of their follow-up appointment, ask about adverse events, and determine if their stone has passed. They have a follow-up visit with study staff at the end of their two week treatment to collect their pain diary, pill count, adverse events, and to determine if their stone has passed. Study participation ends after this follow-up visit.