View clinical trials related to Ureter Injury.
Filter by:For the evaluation of the lower urinary tract after laparoscopic hysterectomy, routine standard saline cystoscopy and carbon dioxide cystoscopy will be compared.
This is an open label, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two dose levels (2.5 mL and 5.0 mL) of Indigotindisulfonate Sodium Injection, USP 0.8% when used as an aid in the determination of ureteral patency in patients with different degrees of renal impairment.
This is a randomized, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two dose levels (2.5 mL and 5.0 mL) of Bludigo™ (indigotindisulfonate Sodium Injection, USP) 0.8% when used as an aid in the determination of ureteral patency. Subjects scheduled for a surgical procedure in which the patency of the ureter must be assessed by cystoscopy following the procedure, age 18 to 85 years inclusive, will be screened for participation. Screening will occur within 30 days before study drug administration (Day of Surgery). After signing the informed consent, review of inclusion and exclusion criteria will be performed, the collection of concomitant medications, medical history, physical examination, baseline laboratory testing, 12-lead ECG, and vital sign measurements will be completed during the screening visit. On the day of surgery (Day 1) subjects will be evaluated for eligibility for randomization. Eligible subjects will be stratified by BMI (<30.0 kg/m2or ≥ 30.0 kg/m2) and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a dose of either Bludigo™ high dose (5.0 mL) or Bludigo™ low dose (2.5 mL). Each randomized subject will serve as his/her own control (i.e., intra-patient controlled) by receiving a dose of normal saline prior to receiving the randomized Bludigo™ dose. All treated subjects will have a follow-up visit 7 to 30 days (± 2 days) after the procedure. A final telephone follow-up call will occur on Day 30 (± 2 days) in subjects who have the follow-up visit before Day 28. Safety assessments will include monitoring of AEs during and post the procedure, clinical laboratory tests, 12-Lead ECG, and vital sign measurements.
This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of intravenous injection of IS-001 to aid in intraoperative ureter structure delineation.
This study evaluates the safety and feasibility of intravenous injection of IS-001 to aid in intraoperative ureter structure delineation
This research study will compare two procedures commonly used to treat urinary obstruction due to cancer. Sometimes cancer blocks one or both ureters (narrow tubes in the body that carry urine from the kidneys to the bladder). When these ureters become blocked, the body can no longer properly drain urine. This blocking of the ureters is called urinary obstruction, which can lead to kidney problems, infection, and pain. Treatment options for urinary obstruction include ureteral stent placement and percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement. Both treatment options require a doctor to place soft tubes (like a catheter) inside the body to help the ureters properly drain urine. These two treatment options have different success rates, risks, and effects on quality of life. By doing this study, researchers hope to learn which treatment option is best for individuals who develop urinary obstruction because of cancer. Participation in this research will last about 3 months.
To determine whether the use of 3,3'-Dioxo-2,2'-Bisindolylidene-5,5'-Disulfonate Disodium 0.8% Solution for injection provides a visualization advantage compared to saline when used as an aid in the determination of ureteral patency
This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of intravenous injection of IS-001 to aid in intraoperative ureter structure delineation. Stage A of the study will determine the safe optimal dose and Stage B will determine expanded safety and efficacy for intraoperative ureter structure delineation for the identified optimal dose in study participants.
Phase 1/2a study, second in-man utilising IRDye800BK in ureteric identification using fluorescence throughout abdominal surgery. Study is open label, non-randomised prospective study.