Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT06425705 |
Other study ID # |
LahoreGeneralH1 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
Phase 2
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
February 25, 2022 |
Est. completion date |
July 10, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
May 2024 |
Source |
Lahore General Hospital |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Given the inadequacies of existing pharmacological interventions for diabetic nephropathy,
this study is predicated on the hypothesis that silymarin, having shown promise in mitigating
hyperglycemia in diabetic patients without nephropathy and displaying renal protective
effects in animal models, merits a thorough and systematic investigation. The current body of
research on silymarin, particularly human trials, is limited by small cohorts and the
preliminary nature of its outcomes. This research aims to evaluate the efficacy of silymarin
as an adjunctive treatment in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) already on
renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, focusing on its potential to reduce proteinuria and
improve renal function. The ultimate objective is to amass more definitive evidence that
could potentially inform a new therapeutic approach in the management of diabetic
nephropathy.
Description:
After securing the approval from the Ethical Review Board of hospital, this study was
conducted in the Nephrology Department, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore. All patients
diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus was assessed based on the previously defined
inclusion and exclusion criteria. Informed consent was obtained from all eligible
participants who agreed to participate in the study.
Baseline Data Collection: Upon enrollment, demographic and clinical information including
age, gender, duration of diabetes, baseline renal function tests, current medication use, and
baseline measures of HBA1c, FBS, RBS and proteinuria were collected. This information was
provided a comprehensive profile of each participant at the start of the study.
Treatment Allocation: Patients was randomly assigned into two groups using a lottery method:
- Group A: received 140 mg of silymarin administered orally three times daily, alongside
their standard treatment with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors.
- Group B: received placebo capsule three times a day alongside their standard treatment
with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors.
Monitoring and Follow-up Assessments: Participants was assessed for outcomes after at one
month and 3 months to monitor changes in proteinuria and renal function. Specific tests were
included:
- Measurement of Urinary Albumin-Creatinine Ratio (UACR): Participants were required to
provide 24-hour urine specimens at one month and three months into the study. To ensure
that the urine samples are not affected by external factors, patients was instructed to
maintain their usual physical activities and avoid strenuous exercises the evening
before the assessment days. Proteinuria was quantified using immunoturbidimetry.
- Assessment of Serum Creatinine and Calculation of eGFR to Monitor Renal Function: The
estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the CKD-EPI formula at
one month and three months. These assessments were help to monitor any changes in renal
function over the course of the study.
- Measurement of HbA1c levels after 3 months. The data was recorded meticulously using
standardized data collection forms. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 26.0. Baseline
characteristics of participants (age, gender, duration of diabetes, baseline renal
function tests, HbA1c, FBS, RBS) were summarized using means and standard deviations for
continuous variables, and frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. Changes
in UACR, eGFR, and HbA1c from baseline to one month and three months were compared
between Group A (silymarin) and Group B (placebo) using independent t-tests or
Mann-Whitney U tests, depending on the normality of the data. Analysis of Covariance
(ANCOVA) was used to adjust for any baseline imbalances and potential confounders
between the two groups. Repeated measures ANOVA were employed to analyze changes over
time within and between treatment groups for UACR, eGFR, and HbA1c levels, accounting
for within-subject correlation over the assessment periods. All statistical tests were
two-sided, and a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.