Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05227677 |
Other study ID # |
GAID1 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
August 15, 2022 |
Est. completion date |
December 2024 |
Study information
Verified date |
January 2024 |
Source |
Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation |
Contact |
Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation |
Phone |
+81366993617 |
Email |
ct-info[@]om.asahi-kasei.co.jp |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
HbA1c is widely used as the gold standard for evaluating glycemic control. However, in
patients who need adjusting hypoglycemic regimen, A1c was not a sensitive marker. In
comparison, serum GA level can reflect the average blood glucose level in the last 2~3 weeks
of diabetes.
Therefore, investigators undertake this study to determine whether knowledge of GA values and
adjusting anti-diabetic regimens according to GA values will result in improved glycemic
control in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
This multicenter randomized controlled clinical study will be conducted in 10 hospitals in
China. A total of 200 patients with newly diagnosed T2DM will be 1:1 randomly assigned to two
groups: intervention group (GA) and control group (NC). In GA group, the anti-diabetic
treatment regimen will be strengthened when GA value is higher than 16% at 4 weeks. In NC
group, investigators will be not aware of the GA value and rely on the current guidelines to
adjust treatment. At 12-week of follow-up,investigators compare the achievement rate of
HbA1c(≤7%) between the two groups.
Description:
At present, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is widely used as the gold standard for
evaluating glycemic control. However, as a marker of average blood glucose level, HbA1c has
some limitations. HbA1c is affected by many conditions, such as hemolytic anemia, recent
blood loss or blood transfusion, chronic renal failure, the use of erythropoietin or other
drugs affecting hematopoiesis, and the presence of variant hemoglobin. In addition, HbA1c
represents the average blood glucose level in the last 2-3 months, in patients who need
adjusting hypoglycemic regimen, A1c was not a sensitive marker. Therefore, finding clinical
markers that can timely guide the adjustment and evaluate therapeutic effects is an urgent
demand for individualized treatment of diabetes.
Glycated albumin (GA) has been available in clinic for sixteen years, yet the clinical value
of routine measurements of GA in the care of diabetic patients is still uncertain. Previous
studies have shown that the GA half-life is 17-19 days, so the serum GA level can reflect the
average blood glucose level and the recent blood glucose changes and the extent of the
changes in the last 2~3 weeks of diabetes, and is not affected by age, gender, diet, drugs
and glycemic fluctuation. A recent short-term study found that in newly diagnosed type 2
diabetic patients with initial therapy and in patients with type 2 diabetes and
unsatisfactory glucose control and need intensifying treatment, changes in GA could predict
changes in HbA1c levels after 3 months. Therefore, investigators undertake this study to
determine whether knowledge of GA values and adjusting anti-diabetic regimens according to GA
values will result in improved glycemic control in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus
(T2DM).
This multicenter randomized controlled clinical study will be conducted in 10 hospitals in
China. A total of 200 patients with newly diagnosed T2DM will be 1:1 randomly assigned to two
groups: intervention group (GA) and control group (NC). In this study, the clinical related
indexes such as GA, fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, fasting C-peptide, fasting insulin, liver
and kidney function, blood routine, blood uric acid and blood lipid were measured at
baseline. The GA serum was frozen and not used as the basis for initial treatment. All the
patients will be treated with antidiabetic therapy according to guideline for prevention and
treatment of type 2 diabetes in China (2020) and followed up for 12 weeks. The GA
concentration will be measured at 4-week intervals. In GA group, the anti-diabetic treatment
regimen will be strengthened when GA value is higher than 16% at 4 weeks. In NC group,
investigators will be not aware of the GA value and rely on the current guidelines to adjust
treatment. At the end of 12 weeks, A1c and other metabolic indexes will be measured again.
All the anti-diabetic drugs are permitted in this study except sulfonylureas, glinides,
insulin and insulin analogues.