View clinical trials related to Tumors.
Filter by:This study is a clinical trial of prospective, two-center, single-arm objective performance criteria. This trial will be conducted in 2 clinical trial sites with a total of 47 subjects enrolled. All of subjects will be treated with radiation therapy using the medical device Varian ProBeam Proton Therapy System (ProBeam), aim to compare the data with objective performance criteria (OPC) to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ProBeam radiotherapy system for oncology patients, providing a clinical basis for the medical device registration.
Fluorescence is one of the most commonly used research and detection techniques in the field of biomedical science. The characteristics of fluorescent probe directly affect the performance and application of fluorescence analysis and imaging. Aggregation-Caused Quenching has limited the application of traditional fluorescent probes to some extent. This project intends to systematically evaluate the detection efficiency of new methods through the detection of biomarkers in clinical samples and the comparison with the detection methods of traditional biomarkers, so as to provide theoretical and experimental basis for the establishment of fast and simple biomarker detection technologies with new biological probes.
The purpose of this study was to establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of ASP1650 (Safety Lead-in Phase), as well as, evaluate the efficacy of ASP1650 as measured by confirmed objective response rate (ORR) (phase 2) in participants with incurable platinum refractory germ cell tumors. This study also evaluated the following efficacy measures for confirmed objective response rate (ORR); clinical benefit rate (CBR); duration of response (DOR); and progression-free survival (PFS); as well as safety and tolerability; the effect of ASP1650 on changes in serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin (βhCG) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP); and the pharmacokinetics of ASP1650.
Summary 1. Purpose and Objective: The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility of rapid acquisition of point of care 3D ultrasound in obtaining abdominal and/or pelvic images. The study will use a newly developed acquisition method and post-processing technique to create three dimensional image models of the abdomen and/or pelvis. 2. Study activities and population group. The study population will be a convenience sample of patients of any age presenting to the Emergency Department with complaints necessitating a clinical abdominal and/or pelvic imaging. The study intervention includes acquisition of research ultrasound images, which will not be used for clinical care, and comparison of these images with clinically obtained images. Other clinical data such as surgical and pathology reports will also be reviewed. 3.Data analysis and risk/safety issues. This is a pilot study intended to determine feasibility and to refine image reconstruction algorithms. Research images will be compared to clinical images. Comparison of research images with final diagnosis will also occur. The research intervention, an ultrasound exam, has no known safety risks. The only risk to subjects is loss of confidentiality. This study is observational, not interventional, because the experimental ultrasound will be performed in all subjects and will not be used in the clinical care of patients (consequently, will not have the opportunity to affect clinical outcomes). Experimental images will be reviewed after completion of clinical care and will not be provided to the clinicians caring for the subjects. The investigators are not measuring the effect of the ultrasound examination on the subjects' outcomes.
This is a multicenter, open-label, non-randomized Phase 1 study in participants with advanced solid tumors, excluding hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), that have progressed after treatment with approved therapies, or for which there are no standard therapies available. The study will also include participants with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC). Its primary intent is to determine the effect of lenvatinib on CYP3A4 activity as well as to assess the safety and activity of lenvatinib in these participants. The study will be conducted in the following 3 phases: Pretreatment Phase, Treatment Phase, and Extension Phase.
This is a Phase I, open-label, two-arm, dose escalation study of PLX038 intravenous infusion administered to patients with refractory or relapsed solid tumors. This study will explore two different dosing schedules: Arm 1, once every 3 week (q3w), and Arm 2, once weekly for 2 consecutive weeks of a 4-week cycle.
Primary Objective Dose Escalation: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of surufatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors and to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) or recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Primary Objective Dose Expansion: To evaluate the anticancer activity of surufatinib in patients with advanced Biliary Tract Cancer (BTC), patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs), patients with locally advanced, unresectable, metastatic extra-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (EP-NETs), and patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS) treated at a dose of 300 mg QD. Secondary Objective: To evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile of multiple dose surufatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors and to evaluate the anti cancer activity of surufatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors.
The purpose of this study is to compare the anti-emetic effect of ramosetron plus aprepitant and dexamethasone with palonosetron plus aprepitant and dexamethasone in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy.
This is an open-label Phase 1b/2 trial of lenvatinib (E7080) plus pembrolizumab in participants with selected solid tumors. Phase 1b will determine and confirm the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for lenvatinib in combination with 200 milligrams (mg) (intravenous [IV], every 3 weeks [Q3W]) pembrolizumab in participants with selected solid tumors (i.e. non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, endometrial carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, melanoma or leiomyosarcoma). Phase 2 (Expansion) will evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination in 7 cohorts at the MTD from Phase 1b (lenvatinib 20 mg/day orally + pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W, IV).
The primary efficacy objective for this study is to evaluate non-progression rate (NPR) at 18 weeks in participants with advanced solid tumors treated with atezolizumab, defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) as assessed by the investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version (v) 1.1, or according to disease-specific criteria for prostate cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma.