View clinical trials related to Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms.
Filter by:This phase I trial tests the safety, side effects, and best dose of a personalized vaccine (tumor membrane vesicle or TMV vaccine) by itself and in combination with checkpoint inhibitor (pembrolizumab or ipilimumab) in treating patients with triple negative breast cancer. This vaccine is made by taking a piece of patient's triple negative breast cancer to design a vaccine to stimulate the immune system's memory. Patients are treated with the personalized vaccine immunotherapy with or without monoclonal antibodies, such as pembrolizumab and ipilimumab. This approach may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Giving personalized TMV vaccine with pembrolizumab or ipilimumab may help the immune system attack cancer better and reduce the risk of this breast cancer coming back or growing.
To look at the effectiveness of the combination of pembrolizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel in participants with stage 1 cT1b-T1cN0M0 Triple Negative Breast Cancer.
This study will determine how the intestinal microbiome differs between patients with obesity and early triple-negative breast cancer who achieve a pathologic complete response from preoperative anti-PD-1 immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) versus patients who do not.
Triple-negative breast carcinoma is characterized by the absence of estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, and HER2/neu receptors. Carbonic anhydrase IX (CA IX) is a tumor-associated cell surface glycoprotein that is involved in adaptation to hypoxia-induced acidosis and plays a role in cancer progression. This study aimed to investigate CA IX expression in TNBC and its relationship with treatment effect.
This is a first-in-human, open-label, multi-center, Phase 1, dose-escalation study with expansion cohorts to evaluate NM32-2668 for safety and immunogenicity, to determine the maximal tolerated dose and recommended Phase 2 dose, define the pharmacokinetics, to explore the pharmacodynamics, and to obtain preliminary evidence of the clinical activity in adult patients with selected advanced solid tumors.
The primary purpose of this study is to determine what proportion of participants will achieve complete pathological response with epirubicin+ cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel +carboplatin. This will also examine the potential of using signals in the blood (biomarkers) to identify resistance to chemotherapy in Nigerian women with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). All enrollment to this trial will occur at sites in Nigeria. University of Chicago is serving as coordinating center and will be involved in data analysis.
This single arm study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a non-surgical approach, consisting of radiotherapy (RT) alone, for patients who have achieved a complete pathological response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). The study design involves the histological confirmation of pCR using vacuum-assisted biopsy (VABB) or vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) guided by ultrasound. The primary objective is to demonstrate that the non-surgical, RT-only treatment and follow-up approach is not inferior to the traditional surgical approach in patients with pCR after NACT.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SKB264 as first-line treatment for patients with unresectable recurrent or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) whose tumors do not express programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) or in patients with PD-L1 positive tumors who received prior anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 inhibitor in early setting
This is a multi-center, single arm, open-label, localized pharmacodynamic biomarker Phase 0 trial designed to study the biological effects within the tumor microenvironment of PBA-0405 when administered intratumorally in microdose quantities via the CIVO device.
In our study; investigator aim To show efficacy and toxicity of Adjuvant cisplatin and gemcitabine in triple-negative breast cancer patients with non pathologically complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy To compare outcome of adjuvant cisplatin and gemcitabine versus capecitabine