Trapeziectomy Suspensionplasty Versus Carpometacarpal Joint Replacement in Treatment of Basal Thumb Osteoarthritis

Thumb Osteoarthritis Clinical Trial

Official title:

Comparison of Trapeziectomy With Suspensionplasty and Carpometacarpal Joint Replacement in Treatment of Basal Thumb Osteoarthritis: Randomised Clinical Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04588961
• Other study ID #: WarsawMU/thumb
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: June 1, 2021
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2024

Study information

• Verified date: September 2020
• Source: Medical University of Warsaw
• Contact: Piotr Stepinski, MD
• Phone: 607 190 402
• Email: piotr.stepinski01[@]gmail.com
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study compares and evaluates differences in movement analysis, patient-reported outcome, radiological assesment and muscular function between patients undergoing carpometacarpal joint arthroplasty with use of modern implants and trapeziectomy with suspensionplasty

Description:

Osteoarthritis of first carpometacarpal joint is the most common degenerative disease of upper limb. According to data available in literature, it affects about 30% of women and 6% of men at the age of 45. Increasing with age, it rises up to 90% in people by the age of 80. Due to more widely spread electronic devices in offices, at work, at home which requires usage of thumb, increase in numbers mentioned above is strongly probable. The main symptoms are: pain, loose of grip strength and loose of function. The latter is most important fact, since about 50% of hand function is possible only with healthy thumb. In many cases osteoarthritis can be treated by combined NSAIDs and splinting with rehabilitation. Sometimes when symptoms do not respond to non-operative treatment, there is a need for surgery. Trapeziectomy is the most common choice for operative treatment for end-stage basal thumb osteoarthritis. However, many other techniques were developed, there is continuous dispute over selecting the optimal . One of the most promising is arthroplasty using prosthesis. Last years many important advances were made in a design of implant and materials. Moreover the investigators now have many longer outcomes of such operation made in the past. All this data make us think more about using this technique often, since there are papers which show superiority over classical trapeziectomy. Even though there are several studies comparing functional and objective outcome of those techniques, there is a lack of evidence in terms of biomechanical analysis, thenar muscle activity and changes in movement patterns. Moreover there is no study published so far which considers modern implants and trapeziectomy with suspensionplasty. The aim of the study is to examine relationships between movement analysis (kinematic and functional outcomes), patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) and X-ray measurement, electromyography both pre- and post-operatively.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 40
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2024
• Est. primary completion date: June 1, 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• osteoarthritis of carpometacarpal joint III or III/IV in Eaton classification assessed by two different radiologists
• symptoms that do not respond to non-operative treatment for 8 weeks
• no counterindications for anaesthesia
• signed agreement for taking a part into trial

Exclusion Criteria:

• patient do not agree to take a part into study
• problems with communication with patient
• unstable cardiac disease
• reoperations
• previous surgical interventions in hand
• neuro-muscular diseases
• rheumatological background of disease
• diagnosed cervical spine disorders

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis
• Osteoarthritis
• Rhizarthrosis
• Thumb Osteoarthritis

Intervention

Procedure:
• Trapeziectomy with suspensionplasty
Surgical removal of trapezium bone and ligamentoplasty of first metacarpal bone using abductor pollicis tendon
• Joint alloplasty
Surgical removal of degenerated joint surfaces nad replacement using modern designed prothesis

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Poland	Department of Othopedics and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Warsaw	Warszawa	Mazowieckie

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Medical University of Warsaw

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Poland, 

References & Publications (19)

Al-Qattan MM, Al Mohrij SA. Mid-Term Results of Partial Trapeziectomy and Simple FCR Tendon Graft Interposition in a Selected Group of Patients with Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Arthritis. J Hand Microsurg. 2020 Apr;12(1):43-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1698356. Epub 2019 Nov 22. — View Citation

Chug M, Williams N, Benn D, Brindley S. Outcome of uncemented trapeziometacarpal prosthesis for treatment of thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis. Indian J Orthop. 2014 Jul;48(4):394-8. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.136270. — View Citation

Degeorge B, Dagneaux L, Andrin J, Lazerges C, Coulet B, Chammas M. Do trapeziometacarpal prosthesis provide better metacarpophalangeal stability than trapeziectomy and ligamentoplasty? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Nov;104(7):1095-1100. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.07.008. Epub 2018 Aug 11. — View Citation

Deiler S. [Basal joint osteoarthritis of the thumb]. Orthopade. 2019 Apr;48(4):351-366. doi: 10.1007/s00132-019-03707-8. German. — View Citation

Kroon FPB, Boersma A, Boonen A, van Beest S, Damman W, van der Heijde D, Rosendaal FR, Kloppenburg M. Performance of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire in hand osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018 Dec;26(12):1627-1635. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.07.018. Epub 2018 Aug 9. — View Citation

Lane JCE, Rodrigues JN, Furniss D, Burn E, Poulter R, Gardiner MD. Basal thumb osteoarthritis surgery improves health state utility irrespective of technique: a study of UK Hand Registry data. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2020 Jun;45(5):436-442. doi: 10.1177/1753193420909753. Epub 2020 Mar 12. — View Citation

Lins L, Carvalho FM. SF-36 total score as a single measure of health-related quality of life: Scoping review. SAGE Open Med. 2016 Oct 4;4:2050312116671725. eCollection 2016. Review. — View Citation

Mahoney JD, Meals RA. Trapeziectomy. Hand Clin. 2006 May;22(2):165-9. Review. — View Citation

Naram A, Lyons K, Rothkopf DM, Calkins ER, Breen T, Jones M, Shufflebarger JV. Increased Complications in Trapeziectomy With Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition Compared With Trapeziectomy Alone. Hand (N Y). 2016 Mar;11(1):78-82. doi: 10.1177/1558944715617215. Epub 2016 Jan 14. — View Citation

Parker S, Riley N, Dean B; Oxford Upper Limb Collaborative. Management of osteoarthritis at the base of the thumb. Bone Joint J. 2020 May;102-B(5):600-605. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B5.BJJ-2019-1464.R2. — View Citation

Robles-Molina MJ, López-Caba F, Gómez-Sánchez RC, Cárdenas-Grande E, Pajares-López M, Hernández-Cortés P. Trapeziectomy With Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition Versus a Trapeziometacarpal Prosthesis for the Treatment of Thumb Basal Joint Osteoarthritis. Orthopedics. 2017 Jul 1;40(4):e681-e686. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20170503-03. Epub 2017 May 8. — View Citation

Rosales RS, García-Gutierrez R, Reboso-Morales L, Atroshi I. The Spanish version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation outcome measure: cross-cultural adaptation process, reliability, measurement error and construct validity. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Aug 24;15(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0745-2. — View Citation

Shah DS, Middleton C, Gurdezi S, Horwitz MD, Kedgley AE. The Effect of Surgical Treatments for Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis on Wrist Biomechanics: A Cadaver Study. J Hand Surg Am. 2020 May;45(5):389-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.10.003. Epub 2019 Nov 14. — View Citation

Sivakumar BS, Graham DJ. APL Lasso Suspensionplasty for Trapeziectomy. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2020 Sep;24(3):108-113. doi: 10.1097/BTH.0000000000000276. — View Citation

Sodha S, Ring D, Zurakowski D, Jupiter JB. Prevalence of osteoarthrosis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Dec;87(12):2614-8. — View Citation

Wajngarten D, Campos JÁDB, Garcia PPNS. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scale in the evaluation of disability - A literature review. Med Lav. 2017 Aug 28;108(4):314-323. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v108i4.6336. Review. — View Citation

Wajon A, Vinycomb T, Carr E, Edmunds I, Ada L. Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 23;(2):CD004631. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004631.pub4. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 03;4:CD004631. — View Citation

Wang T, Zhao G, Rui YJ, Mi JY. Outcomes of modified trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction tendon interposition for the treatment of advanced thumb carpometacarpal arthritis: Two-year follow-up. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(13):e0235. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010235. — View Citation

Weiss AC, Goodman AD. Thumb Basal Joint Arthritis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 Aug 15;26(16):562-571. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00374. Review. — View Citation

* Note: There are 19 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Changes in patients reported outcomes - DASH (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand)	To measure overall disabilities of upper limb. Results range from 0 to 100, with lower scores corresponding to better outcomes.	at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Secondary	Changes in patients reported outcomes - PRWE (Patient Related Wrist Evaluation)	To measure wrist pain and disability in activities of daily living. Results range from 0 to 50, with lower scores corresponding to better outcomes.	at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Secondary	Changes in patients reported outcomes - Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionaire	To explore differences in higher levels of activity at work and social participation. Results range from 0 to 100, with higher scores corresponding to better outcomes.	at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Secondary	Changes in patients reported outcomes - SF-36 (Short Form 36)	To explore differences in quality of life. Results range from 0 to 100, with higher scores corresponding to better outcomes.	at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Secondary	Changes in patients reported outcome measures - VAS (Visual Analogue Score)	To explore differences in pain. Results range from 0 to 100, with lower scores corresponding to better outcomes.	at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Secondary	Changes in carpometacarpal, carpophalangeal and wrist range of motion	To explore differences in range of motion. This parameter will be measured with goniometer in flexion, extension, adduction and abduction in all thumb joints. Outcomes would be numers of degrees ranging from 0-360, with higher number corresponding with better outcomes	at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Secondary	Changes in usage of painkillers	To asses evolution of post-operative thumb pain. Dosage, frequency of utilisation and type of medicines will be measured in self-designed questionnaire, with lower dosage, lower frequency and less powerful medicines corresponding with better results	at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Secondary	Operation related complications	To count and asses all complications that may occur during surgery and in postoperative period	at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Secondary	Arthroplasty revision surgeries	To count and asses the reason of all revision surgeries that may occur during postoperative period	at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Secondary	Biomechanical 3D motion analysis	Movements in whole range are measured using 3D motion analysis, using a special software. With more physiological movement patterns corresponding with better results	at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Secondary	Radiological outcome on x-rays	To asses any changes in alignment of implants with would be measured with degrees (angles) with more degrees of change after operation corresponding with worse outcome	at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Secondary	Muscle strength outcomes	Muscle strength during grip measured using maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC)	at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
Secondary	EMG measured bioelectrical potentials	Percutaneus electromyography (EMG) will be performed to measure bioelectrical potentials of thumb muscles, to assess ability to contracture	at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively