View clinical trials related to Tachycardia.
Filter by:Catheter ablation of Ventricular Tachycardias is a well-established approach in clinical practice in patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) implanted. Previous studies have shown a significant reduction in appropriate shocks (~ 20%) and a significant reduction in hospitalizations for cardiovascular reasons (~ 12%) in patients with ischemic heart disease treated with ablation. Recent works have also shown the effectiveness of the ablation procedure using as procedural target the reduction of late potentials. However, actually it is necessary to have an homogenize and accepted mapping scheme in Sinus Rhythm to ablate Ventricular Tachycardias related to scar substrate in patients with: - Previous MI - Previous myocarditis - Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia (ARVD) - Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy (IDCM) Scope of the registry is to collect data during cardiac mapping in Sinus Rhythm in patients indicated for Ventricular Tachycardia ablation, that will be performed per clinical practice, by using the St. Jude Medical EnSiteTM PrecisionTM mapping system. The objective of the present registry is: to assess the acute and long-term efficacy of the strategy of substrate abolition (abolishment of complex and late potentials) guided by electroanatomic mapping with Precision software.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of etripamil nasal spray (NS) 70 mg when self-administered by patients with an episode of Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia in an outpatient setting (i.e., without medical supervision).
Background: Patients at increased risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD) may receive an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The primary criterion for a primary prevention ICD implantation is a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 35%, but refinement of ICD criteria is important since only a small proportion of ICD patients receives appropriate device therapy (ATP or a shock) during follow-up. Post-extrasystolic potentiation (PESP) may be a new risk marker for SCD. PESP is defined as a temporary increase in contractility that follows an extrasystolic beat (ESB) and is associated with myocardial calcium handling. In heart failure, changes in calcium homeostasis may lead to afterdepolarisations and thus predispose for SCD. PESP can be measured indirectly and non-invasively as post-extrasystolic blood pressure potentiation (PESP-BP). Abnormal PESP-BP was previously found to be an independent predictor of increased mortality in post-myocardial infarction patients with a reduced LVEF. However, it is unknown if this increased mortality in heart failure patients with abnormal PESP-BP is caused by an increased risk of SCD. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that PESP-BP might be a new predictor of the occurrence of SCD, and can be used to enhance patient selection for primary prevention ICD therapy. Design: During scheduled device replacement ESB with various extrasystolic and post-extrasystolic coupling intervals will be evoked by electrical stimulation via the right atrial and ventricular device leads of the patient. Throughout the stimulation study blood pressure will be measured non-invasively a continuous electrocardiogram will be recorded. Either before or after the procedure, patients will undergo a 30-minutes assessment of spontaneous ESB, again with blood pressure and ECG recordings. Study population: 30 patients who are scheduled for device replacement or reposition, are eligible for this study; (1) 10 ICD patients who previously received appropriate device therapy (ADT); (2) 10 ICD patients who are free from ADT and (3) 10 dual-chamber pacemaker patients (control group). Outcomes: (1) Evoked PESP-BP (i.e. blood pressure differences between baseline, ESB and post-ESB); (2) Spontaneous PESP-BP (i.e. blood pressure differences between baseline, ESB and post-ESB); (3) Timing parameters (in ms): the basic cycle length interval; Extra-systolic interval (ESI); Post-extrasystolic interval (PESI).
This is an early feasibility, non-randomized, open-label, single group, interventional study to be conducted in up to 20 US subjects to evaluate the technical feasibility of the Durablate Catheter and Thermedical Ablation System to eliminate or control sustained, monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with VT refractory to drug and conventional catheter ablation with acceptable procedural safety.
This study is an observational study without any hypothesis testing. It intended to observe the clinical application of electrophysiological mapping and catheter ablation of atrial tachycardia post atrial fibrillation ablation or cardiac surgery guided with Rhythmia System.
Aim of this study is to collect data from pace mapping performed in three groups of patients : patients presenting ventricular tachycardia and infarction history, patients presenting infarction history without presenting ventricular tachycardia, and in patients without structural heart disease.
The proposed study is designed to characterize the safety and efficacy of a new extravascular implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) system in humans.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate cognition in patients with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) while lying down and standing and to assess the prevalence of hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome in POTS.
Phase I/II study of 4-D Navigated Non-invasive radiosurgical ablation of ventricular tachycardia (NIRA-VT).
The PROTECT-ICD trial is a physician-led, multi-centre randomised controlled trial targeting prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients who have poor cardiac function following a myocardial infarct (MI). The trial aims to assess the role of electrophysiology study (EPS) in guiding implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation, in patients early following MI (first 40 days). The secondary aim is to assess the utility of cardiac MRI (CMR) in analysing cardiac function and viability as well as predicting inducible and spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmia when performed early post MI. Following a MI patients are at high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). The risk is highest in the first 40 days; however, current guidelines exclude patients from receiving an ICD during this time. This limitation is based largely on a single study, The Defibrillator in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial (DINAMIT), which failed to demonstrate a benefit of early ICD implantation. However, this study was underpowered and used non-invasive tests to identify patients at high risk. EPS identifies patients with the substrate for re-entrant tachyarrhythmia, and has been found in multiple studies to predict patients at risk of SCD. Contrast-enhanced CMR is a non-invasive test without radiation exposure which can be used to assess left ventricular function. In addition, it provides information on myocardial viability, scar size and tissue heterogeneity. It has an emerging role as a predictor of mortality and spontaneous ventricular arrhythmia in patients with a previous MI. A total of 1,058 patients who are at high risk of SCD based on poor cardiac function (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%) following a ST-elevation or non-STE myocardial infarct will be enrolled in the trial. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to either the intervention or control arm. In the intervention arm all patients undergo early EPS. Patients with a positive study (inducible ventricular tachycardia cycle length ≥200ms) receive an ICD, while patients with a negative study (inducible ventricular fibrillation or no inducible VT) are discharged without an ICD, regardless of the LVEF. In the control arm patients are treated according to standard local practice. This involves early discharge and repeat assessment of cardiac function after 40 days or after 90 days following revascularisation (PCI or CABG). ICD implantation after 40 days according to current guidelines (LVEF≤30%, or ≤35% with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II/III symptoms) could be considered, if part of local standard practice, however the ICD is not funded by the trial. A proportion of trial patients from both the intervention and control arms at >48 hours following MI will undergo CMR to enable correlation with (1) inducible VT at EPS and (2) SCD and non-fatal arrhythmia on follow up. It will be used to simultaneously assess left ventricular function, ventricular strain, myocardial infarction size, and peri-infarction injury. The size of the infarct core, infarct gray zone (as a measure of tissue heterogeneity) and total infarct size will be quantified for each patient. All patients will be followed for 2 years with a combined primary endpoint of non-fatal arrhythmia and SCD. Non-fatal arrhythmia includes resuscitated cardiac arrest, sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) in participants without an ICD. Secondary endpoints will include all-cause mortality, non-sudden cardiovascular death, non-fatal repeat MI, heart failure and inappropriate ICD denial. Secondary endpoints for CMR correlation will include (1) the presence or absence of inducible VT at EP study, and (2) combined endpoint of appropriate ICD activation or SCD at follow up. It is anticipated that the intervention arm will reduce the primary endpoint as a result of prevention of a) early sudden cardiac deaths/cardiac arrest, and b) sudden cardiac death/cardiac arrest in patients with a LVEF of 31-40%. It is expected that the 2-year primary endpoint rate will be reduced from 6.7% in the control arm to 2.8% in the intervention arm with a relative risk reduction (RRR) of 68%. A two-group chi-squared test with a 0.05 two-sided significance level will have 80% power to detect the difference between a Group 1 proportion of 0.028 experiencing the primary endpoint and a Group 2 proportion of 0.067 experiencing the primary endpoint when the sample size in each group is 470. Assuming 1% crossover and 10% loss to follow up the required sample size is 1,058 (n=529 patients per arm). To test the hypothesis that tissue heterogeneity at CMR predicts both inducible and spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias will require a sample size of 400 patients to undergo CMR. It is anticipated that the use of EPS will select a group of patients who will benefit from an ICD soon after a MI. This has the potential to change clinical guidelines and save a large number of lives.